<![CDATA[New Human New Earth Communities

<![CDATA[New Human New Earth Communities - End the Fraud]]>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 18:40:25 -0800Weebly<![CDATA[Global Brian Chip and Mesogens]]>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:17:54 GMThttps://www.newhumannewearthcommunities.com/end-the-fraud/global-brian-chip-and-mesogensEven the NASA inventor and author, Ray Kurzweil in his book, The Singularity is Near, stated that by 2035, an implantable information chip could be developed and wired directly to the user’s brain. The reality is that it is happening now through the advancements of sciences, computers, semiconductors, engineering, medicine, chemistry, and many other disciplines of science and engineering. This paper will address a specific case study of the removal of a menginoma, non-cancerous brain tumor, which in reality turned out to be a reactive nematic mesogen composed of advanced nano material brain chip/sensor for brain-computer interface. Additional mesogens will be discussed that were isolated from various human body surfaces and, specifically, from three different individual nasal passages, within a week of each other, that crossed the United States and Saudi Arabia.
Continue: https://open.substack.com/pub/anamihalceamdphd/p/global-brain-chip-and-mesogens-nano?r=1qpmbr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web]]><![CDATA[Mortgage Foreclosure Fraud - The First Pandemic: How foreclosure courts helped big banks screw over homeowners]]>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 14:25:13 GMThttps://www.newhumannewearthcommunities.com/end-the-fraud/mortgage-foreclosure-fraud-the-first-pandemic-how-foreclosure-courts-helped-big-banks-screw-over-homeownersThe First Pandemic: How foreclosure courts helped big banks screw over homeowners

The foreclosure lawyers down in Jacksonville had warned me, but I was skeptical. They told me the state of Florida had created a special super-high-speed housing court with a specific mandate to rubber-stamp the legally dicey foreclosures by corporate mortgage pushers like Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan Chase. This “rocket docket,” as it is called in town, is presided over by retired judges who seem to have no clue about the insanely complex financial instruments they are ruling on — securitized mortgages and labyrinthine derivative deals of a type that didn’t even exist when most of them were active members of the bench.
Their stated mission isn’t to decide right and wrong, but to clear cases and blast human beings out of their homes with ultimate velocity. They certainly have no incentive to penetrate the profound criminal mysteries of the great American mortgage bubble of the 2000s, perhaps the most complex Ponzi scheme in human history — an epic mountain range of corporate fraud in which Wall Street megabanks conspired first to collect huge numbers of subprime mortgages, then to unload them on unsuspecting third parties like pensions, trade unions and insurance companies (and, ultimately, you and me, as taxpayers) in the guise of AAA-rated investments.
Selling lead as gold, shit as Chanel No. 5, was the essence of the booming international fraud scheme that created most all of these now-failing home mortgages. Looting Main Street The rocket docket wasn’t created to investigate any of that. It exists to launder the crime and bury the evidence by speeding thousands of fraudulent and predatory loans to the ends of their life cycles, so that the houses attached to them can be sold again with clean paperwork. The judges, in fact, openly admit that their primary mission is not justice but speed.
One Jacksonville judge, the Honorable A.C. Soud, even told a local newspaper that his goal is to resolve 25 cases per hour. Given the way the system is rigged, that means His Honor could well be throwing one ass on the street every 2.4 minutes.
Foreclosure lawyers told me one other thing about the rocket docket. The hearings, they said, aren’t exactly public. “The judges might give you a hard time about watching,” one lawyer warned. “They’re not exactly anxious for people to know about this stuff.” Inwardly, I laughed at this — it sounded like typical activist paranoia.
The notion that a judge would try to prevent any citizen, much less a member of the media, from watching an open civil hearing sounded ridiculous. F-up as everyone knows the state of Florida is, it couldn’t be that bad. It isn’t Indonesia. Right?

Illustration by Victor Juhasz By Matt Taibbi

Well, not quite. When I went to sit in on Judge Soud’s courtroom in downtown Jacksonville, I was treated to an intimate, and at times breathtaking, education in the horror of the foreclosure crisis, which is rapidly emerging as the even scarier sequel to the financial meltdown of 2008: Invasion of the Home Snatchers II.
In Las Vegas, one in 25 homes is now in foreclosure. In Fort Myers, Florida, one in 35. In September, lenders nationwide took over a record 102,134 properties; that same month, more than a third of all home sales were distressed properties.
All told, some 820,000 Americans have already lost their homes this year, and another 1 million currently face foreclosure. Matt Taibbi: The Crying Shame of John Boehner Throughout the mounting catastrophe, however, many Americans have been slow to comprehend the true nature of the mortgage disaster.
They seemed to have grasped just two things about the crisis: One, a lot of people are getting their houses foreclosed on. Two, some of the banks doing the foreclosing seem to have misplaced their paperwork. For most people, the former bit about homeowners not paying their damn bills is the important part, while the latter, about the sudden and strange inability of the world’s biggest and wealthiest banks to keep proper records, is incidental.
Just a little office sloppiness, and who cares? Those deadbeat homeowners still owe the money, right? “They had it coming to them,” is how a bartender at the Jacksonville airport put it to me. But in reality, it’s the unpaid bills that are incidental and the lost paperwork that matters. It turns out that underneath that little iceberg tip of exposed evidence lies a fraud so gigantic that it literally cannot be contemplated by our leaders, for fear of admitting that our entire financial system is corrupted to its core — with our great banks and even our government coffers backed not by real wealth but by vast landfills of deceptively generated and essentially worthless mortgage-backed assets. You’ve heard of Too Big to Fail — the foreclosure crisis is Too Big for Fraud.
Think of the Bernie Madoff scam, only replicated tens of thousands of times over, infecting every corner of the financial universe. The underlying crime is so pervasive, we simply can’t admit to it — and so we are working feverishly to rubber-stamp the problem away, in sordid little backrooms in cities like Jacksonville, behind doors that shouldn’t be, but often are, closed.
And that’s just the economic side of the story. The moral angle to the foreclosure crisis — and, of course, in capitalism we’re not supposed to be concerned with the moral stuff, but let’s mention it anyway — shows a culture that is slowly giving in to a futuristic nightmare ideology of computerized greed and unchecked financial violence.
The monster in the foreclosure crisis has no face and no brain. The mortgages that are being foreclosed upon have no real owners. The lawyers bringing the cases to evict the humans have no real clients. It is complete and absolute legal and economic chaos. No single limb of this vast man-eating thing knows what the other is doing, which makes it nearly impossible to combat — and scary as hell to watch. What follows is an account of a single hour of Judge A.C. Soud’s rocket docket in Jacksonville.
Like everything else related to the modern economy, these foreclosure hearings are conducted in what is essentially a foreign language, heavy on jargon and impenetrable to the casual observer. It took days of interviews with experts before and after this hearing to make sense of this single hour of courtroom drama. And though the permutations of small-time scammery and grift in the foreclosure world are virtually endless — your average foreclosure case involves homeowners or investors being screwed at least five or six creative ways — a single hour of court and a few cases is enough to tell the main story. Because if you see one of these scams, you see them all. It’s early on a sunny Tuesday morning when I arrive at the chambers of Judge Soud, one of four rotating judges who preside over the local rocket docket.
These special foreclosure courts were established in July of this year, after the state of Florida budgeted $9.6 million to create a new court with a specific mandate to clear 62 percent of the foreclosure cases that were clogging up the system. Rather than forcing active judges to hear thousands of individual cases, this strategy relies on retired judges who take turns churning through dozens of cases every morning, with little time to pay much attention to the particulars. What passes for a foreclosure court in Jacksonville is actually a small conference room at the end of a hall on the fifth floor of the drab brick Duval County Courthouse. The space would just about fit a fridge and a pingpong table.
At the head of a modest conference table this morning sits Judge Soud, a small and fussy-looking man who reminds me vaguely of the actor Ben Gazzara. On one side of the table sits James Kowalski, a former homicide prosecutor who is now defending homeowners. A stern man with a shaved head and a laconic manner of speaking, Kowalski has helped pioneer a whole new approach to the housing mess, slowing down the mindless eviction machine by deposing the scores of “robo-signers” being hired by the banks to sign phony foreclosure affidavits by the thousands. For his work on behalf of the dispossessed, Kowalski was recently profiled in a preposterous Wall Street Journal article that blamed attorneys like him for causing the foreclosure mess with their nuisance defense claims.
The headline: “Niche Lawyers Spawned Housing Fracas.” On the other side of the table are the plaintiff’s attorneys, the guys who represent the banks. On this level of the game, these lawyers refer to themselves as “bench warmers” — volume stand-ins subcontracted by the big, hired-killer law firms that work for the banks. One of the bench warmers present today is Mark Kessler, who works for a number of lenders and giant “foreclosure mills,” including the one run by David J. Stern, a gazillionaire attorney and all-Universe asshole who last year tried to foreclose on 70,382 homeowners. Which is a nice way to make a living, considering that Stern and his wife, Jeanine, have bought nearly $60 million in property for themselves in recent years, including a 9,273-square-foot manse in Fort Lauderdale that is part of a Ritz-Carlton complex.
Kessler is a harried, middle-aged man in glasses who spends the morning perpetually fighting to organize a towering stack of folders, each one representing a soon-to-be-homeless human being. It quickly becomes apparent that Kessler is barely acquainted with the names in the files, much less the details of each case. “A lot of these guys won’t even get the folders until right before the hearing,” says Kowalski.
When I arrive, Judge Soud and the lawyers are already arguing a foreclosure case; at a break in the action, I slip into the chamber with a legal-aid attorney who’s accompanying me and sit down. The judge eyes me anxiously, then proceeds. He clears his throat, and then it’s ready, set, fraud! Judge Soud seems to have no clue that the files he is processing at a breakneck pace are stuffed with fraudulent claims and outright lies. “We have not encountered any fraud yet,” he recently told a local newspaper.
“If we encountered fraud, it would go to [the state attorney], I can tell you that.” But the very first case I see in his court is riddled with fraud. Kowalski has seen hundreds of cases like the one he’s presenting this morning. It started back in 2006, when he went to Pennsylvania to conduct what he thought would be a routine deposition of an official at the lending giant GMAC. What he discovered was that the official — who had sworn to having personal knowledge of the case — was, in fact, just a “robo-signer” who had signed off on the file without knowing anything about the actual homeowner or his payment history. (Kowalski’s clients, like most of the homeowners he represents, were actually making their payments on time; in this particular case, a check had been mistakenly refused by GMAC.)
Following the evidence, Kowalski discovered what has turned out to be a systemwide collapse of the process for documenting mortgages in this country. If you’re foreclosing on somebody’s house, you are required by law to have a collection of paperwork showing the journey of that mortgage note from the moment of issuance to the present.
You should see the originating lender (a firm like Countrywide) selling the loan to the next entity in the chain (perhaps Goldman Sachs) to the next (maybe JP Morgan), with the actual note being transferred each time. But in fact, almost no bank currently foreclosing on homeowners has a reliable record of who owns the loan; in some cases, they have even intentionally shredded the actual mortgage notes.
That’s where the robo-signers come in. To create the appearance of paperwork where none exists, the banks drag in these pimply entry-level types — an infamous example is GMAC’s notorious robo-signer Jeffrey Stephan, who appears online looking like an age-advanced photo of Beavis or Butt-Head — and get them to sign thousands of documents a month attesting to the banks’ proper ownership of the mortgages.
This isn’t some rare goof-up by a low-level cubicle slave: Virtually every case of foreclosure in this country involves some form of screwed-up paperwork. “I would say it’s pretty close to 100 percent,” says Kowalski. An attorney for Jacksonville Area Legal Aid tells me that out of the hundreds of cases she has handled, fewer than five involved no phony paperwork. “The fraud is the norm,” she says. Kowalski’s current case before Judge Soud is a perfect example. The Jacksonville couple he represents are being sued for delinquent payments, but the case against them has already been dismissed once before. The first time around, the plaintiff, Bank of New York Mellon, wrote in Paragraph 8 that “plaintiff owns and holds the note” on the house belonging to the couple.
But in Paragraph 3 of the same complaint, the bank reported that the note was “lost or destroyed,” while in Paragraph 4 it attests that “plaintiff cannot reasonably obtain possession of the promissory note because its whereabouts cannot be determined.” The bank, in other words, tried to claim on paper, in court, that it both lost the note and had it, at the same time.
Moreover, it claimed that it had included a copy of the note in the file, which it did — the only problem being that the note (a) was not properly endorsed, and (b) was payable not to Bank of New York but to someone else, a company called Novastar. Now, months after its first pass at foreclosure was dismissed, the bank has refiled the case — and what do you know, it suddenly found the note. And this time, somehow, the note has the proper stamps.
“There’s a stamp that did not appear on the note that was originally filed,” Kowalski tells the judge. (This business about the stamps is hilarious. “You can get them very cheap online,” says Chip Parker, an attorney who defends homeowners in Jacksonville.) The bank’s new set of papers also traces ownership of the loan from the original lender, Novastar, to JP Morgan and then to Bank of New York. The bank, in other words, is trying to push through a completely new set of documents in its attempts to foreclose on Kowalski’s clients.
There’s only one problem: The dates of the transfers are completely fucked. According to the documents, JP Morgan transferred the mortgage to Bank of New York on December 9th, 2008. But according to the same documents, JP Morgan didn’t even receive the mortgage from Novastar until February 2nd, 2009 — two months after it had supposedly passed the note along to Bank of New York. Such rank incompetence at doctoring legal paperwork is typical of foreclosure actions, where the fraud is laid out in ink in ways that make it impossible for anyone but an overburdened, half-asleep judge to miss. “That’s my point about all of this,” Kowalski tells me later.
“If you’re going to lie to me, at least lie well.” The dates aren’t the only thing screwy about the new documents submitted by Bank of New York. Having failed in its earlier attempt to claim that it actually had the mortgage note, the bank now tries an all-of-the-above tactic. “Plaintiff owns and holds the note,” it claims, “or is a person entitled to enforce the note.” Soud sighs. For Kessler, the plaintiff’s lawyer, to come before him with such sloppy documents and make this preposterous argument — that his client either is or is not the note-holder — well, that puts His Honor in a tough spot. The entire concept is a legal absurdity, and he can’t sign off on it. With an expression of something very like regret, the judge tells Kessler, “I’m going to have to go ahead and accept [Kowalski’s] argument.” Now, one might think that after a bank makes multiple attempts to push phony documents through a courtroom, a judge might be pissed off enough to simply rule against that plaintiff for good.
As I witness in court all morning, the defense never gets more than one chance to screw up. But the banks get to keep filing their foreclosures over and over again, no matter how atrocious and deceitful their paperwork is. Thus, when Soud tells Kessler that he’s dismissing the case, he hastens to add: “Of course, I’m not going to dismiss with prejudice.” With an emphasis on the words “of course.” Instead, Soud gives Kessler 25 days to come up with better paperwork. Kowalski fully expects the bank to come back with new documents telling a whole new story of the note’s ownership. “What they’re going to do, I would predict, is produce a note and say Bank of New York is not the original note-holder, but merely the servicer,” he says. This is the dirty secret of the rocket docket: The whole system is set up to enable lenders to commit fraud over and over again, until they figure out a way to reduce the stink enough so some judge like Soud can sign off on the scam.
“If the court finds for the defendant, the plaintiffs just refile,” says Parker, the local attorney. “The only way for the caseload to get reduced is to give it to the plaintiff. The entire process is designed with that result in mind.” Now all of this — the obviously cooked-up documents, the magically appearing stamp and the rest of it — may just seem like nothing more than sloppy paperwork. After all, what does it matter if the bank has lost a few forms or mixed up the dates?
The homeowners still owe what they owe, and the deadbeats have no right to keep living in a house they haven’t paid for. But what’s going on at the Jacksonville rocket docket, and in foreclosure courts all across the country, has nothing to do with sloppiness. All this phony paperwork was actually an essential part of the mortgage bubble, an integral element of what has enabled the nation’s biggest lenders to pass off all that subprime lead as AAA gold. In the old days, when you took out a mortgage, it was probably through a local bank or a credit union, and whoever gave you your loan held on to it for life.
If you lost your job or got too sick to work and suddenly had trouble making your payments, you could call a human being and work things out. It was in the banker’s interest, as well as yours, to make a modified payment schedule. From his point of view, it was better that you pay something than nothing at all. But that all changed about a decade ago, thanks to the invention of new financial instruments that magically turned all these mortgages into high-grade investments. Now when you took out a mortgage, your original lender — which might well have been a big mortgage mill like Countrywide or New Century — immediately sold off your loan to big banks like Deutsche and Goldman and JP Morgan. The banks then dumped hundreds or thousands of home loans at a time into tax-exempt real estate trusts, where the loans were diced up into securities, examined and graded by the ratings agencies, and sold off to big pension funds and other institutional suckers. Even at this stage of the game, the banks generally knew that the loans they were buying and reselling to investors were shady. A company called Clayton Holdings, which analyzed nearly 1 million loans being prepared for sale in 2006 and 2007 by 23 banks, found that nearly half of the mortgages failed to meet the underwriting standards being promised to investors. Citigroup, for instance, had 29 percent of its loans come up short, but it still sold a third of those mortgages to investors.
Goldman Sachs had 19 percent of its mortgages flunk the test, yet it knowingly hawked 34 percent of the risky deals to investors. D. Keith Johnson, the head of Clayton Holdings, was so alarmed by the findings that he went to officials at three of the main ratings agencies — Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s, and Fitch’s — and tried to get them to properly evaluate the loans. “Wouldn’t this information be great for you to have as you assign risk levels?” he asked them. (Translation: Don’t you ratings agencies want to know that half these loans are crap before you give them a thumbs-up?) But all three agencies rejected his advice, fearing they would lose business if they adopted tougher standards. In the end, the agencies gave large chunks of these mortgage-backed securities AAA ratings — which means “credit risk almost zero.” Since these mortgage-backed securities paid much higher returns than other AAA investments like treasury notes or corporate bonds, the banks had no trouble attracting investors, foreign and domestic, from pension funds to insurance companies to trade unions. The demand was so great, in fact, that they often sold mortgages they didn’t even have yet, prompting big warehouse lenders like Countrywide and New Century to rush out into the world to find more warm bodies to lend to. In their extreme haste to get thousands and thousands of mortgages they could resell to the banks, the lenders committed an astonishing variety of fraud, from falsifying income statements to making grossly inflated appraisals to misrepresenting properties to home buyers. Most crucially, they gave tons and tons of credit to people who probably didn’t deserve it, and why not? These fly-by-night mortgage companies weren’t going to hold on to these loans, not even for 10 minutes. They were issuing this credit specifically to sell the loans off to the big banks right away, in furtherance of the larger scheme to dump fraudulent AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities on investors. If you had a pulse, they had a house to sell you. As bad as Countrywide and all those lenders were, the banks that had sent them out to collect these crap loans were a hundred times worse. To sell the loans, the banks often dumped them into big tax-exempt buckets called REMICs, or Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits. Each one of these Enron-ish, offshore-like real estate trusts spelled out exactly what kinds of loans were supposed to be in the pool, when they were to be collected, and how they were to be managed. In order to both preserve their tax-exempt status and deserve their AAA ratings, each of the loans in the pool had to have certain characteristics. The loans couldn’t already be in default or foreclosure at the time they were sold to investors.
If they were advertised as nice, safe, fixed-rate mortgages, they couldn’t turn out to be high-interest junk loans. And, on the most basic level, the loans had to actually exist. In other words, if the trust stipulated that all the loans had to be collected by August 2005, the bank couldn’t still be sticking in mortgages months later. Yet that’s exactly what the banks did. In one case handled by Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, a homeowner refinanced her house in 2005 but almost immediately got into trouble, going into default in December of that year. Yet somehow, this woman’s loan was placed into a trust called Home Equity Loan Trust Series AE 2005-HE5 in January 2006 — five months after the deadline for that particular trust. The loan was not only late, it was already in foreclosure — which means that, by definition, whoever the investors were in AE 2005-HE5 were getting shafted. Why does stuff like this matter? Because when the banks put these pools together, they were telling their investors that they were putting their money into tidy collections of real, performing home loans.
But frequently, the loans in the trust were complete shit. Or sometimes, the banks didn’t even have all the loans they said they had. But the banks sold the securities based on these pools of mortgages as AAA-rated gold anyway. In short, all of this was a scam — and that’s why so many of these mortgages lack a true paper trail. Had these transfers been done legally, the actual mortgage note and detailed information about all of these transactions would have been passed from entity to entity each time the mortgage was sold. But in actual practice, the banks were often committing securities fraud (because many of the mortgages did not match the information in the prospectuses given to investors) and tax fraud (because the way the mortgages were collected and serviced often violated the strict procedures governing such investments).
Having unloaded this diseased cargo onto their unsuspecting customers, the banks had no incentive to waste money keeping “proper” documentation of all these dubious transactions. “You’ve already committed fraud once,” says April Charney, an attorney with Jacksonville Area Legal Aid. “What do you have to lose?” Sitting in the rocket docket, James Kowalski considers himself lucky to have won his first motion of the morning. To get the usually intractable Judge Soud to forestall a foreclosure is considered a real victory, and I later hear Kowalski getting props and attaboys from other foreclosure lawyers. In a great deal of these cases, in fact, the homeowners would have a pretty good chance of beating the rap, at least temporarily, if only they had lawyers fighting for them in court. But most of them don’t. In fact, more than 90 percent of the cases that go through Florida foreclosure courts are unopposed. Either homeowners don’t know they can fight their foreclosures, or they simply can’t afford an attorney.
These unopposed cases are the ones the banks know they’ll win — which is why they don’t sweat it if they take the occasional whipping. That’s why all these colorful descriptions of cases where foreclosure lawyers like Kowalski score in court are really just that — a little color. The meat of the foreclosure crisis is the unopposed cases; that’s where the banks make their money. They almost always win those cases, no matter what’s in the files. This becomes evident after Kowalski leaves the room. “Who’s next?” Judge Soud says. He turns to Mark Kessler, the counsel for the big foreclosure mills. “Mark, you still got some?” “I’ve got about three more, Judge,” says Kessler.
Kessler then drops three greenish-brown files in front of Judge Soud, who spends no more than a minute or two glancing through each one. Then he closes the files and puts an end to the process by putting his official stamp on each foreclosure with an authoritative finality: Each one of those kerchunks means another family on the street.
There are no faces involved here, just beat-the-clock legal machinery. Watching Judge Soud plow through each foreclosure reminds me of the scene in Fargo where the villain played by Swedish character actor Peter Stormare pushes his victim’s leg through a wood chipper with that trademark bored look on his face. Mechanized misery and brainless bureaucracy on the one hand, cash for the banks on the other. What’s sad is that most Americans who have an opinion about the foreclosure crisis don’t give a shit about all the fraud involved.
They don’t care that these mortgages wouldn’t have been available in the first place if the banks hadn’t found a way to sell oregano as weed to pension funds and insurance companies. They don’t care that the Countrywides of the world pushed borrowers who qualified for safer fixed-income loans into far more dangerous adjustable-rate loans, because their brokers got bigger commissions for doing so. They don’t care that in the rush to produce loans, people were sold houses that turned out to have flood damage or worse, and they certainly don’t care that people were sold houses with inflated appraisals, which left them almost immediately underwater once housing prices started falling.
The way the banks tell it, it doesn’t matter if they defrauded homeowners and investors and taxpayers alike to get these loans. All that matters is that a bunch of deadbeats aren’t paying their fucking bills. “If you didn’t pay your mortgage, you shouldn’t be in your house — period,” is how Walter Todd, portfolio manager at Greenwood Capital Associates, puts it. “People are getting upset about something that’s just procedural.” Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan, is even more succinct in dismissing the struggling homeowners that he and the other megabanks scammed before tossing out into the street. “We’re not evicting people who deserve to stay in their house,” Dimon says. There are two things wrong with this argument. (Well, more than two, actually, but let’s just stick to the two big ones.) The first reason is: It simply isn’t true.
Many people who are being foreclosed on have actually paid their bills and followed all the instructions laid down by their banks. In some cases, a homeowner contacts the bank to say that he’s having trouble paying his bill, and the bank offers him loan modification. But the bank tells him that in order to qualify for modification, he must first be delinquent on his mortgage. “They actually tell people to stop paying their bills for three months,” says Parker. The authorization gets recorded in what’s known as the bank’s “contact database,” which records every phone call or other communication with a homeowner. But no mention of it is entered into the bank’s “number history,” which records only the payment record. When the number history notes that the homeowner has missed three payments in a row, it has no way of knowing that the homeowner was given permission to stop making payments.
“One computer generates a default letter,” says Kowalski. “Another computer contacts the credit bureaus.” At no time is there a human being looking at the entire picture. Which means that homeowners can be foreclosed on for all sorts of faulty reasons: misplaced checks, address errors, you name it. This inability of one limb of the foreclosure beast to know what the other limb is doing is responsible for many of the horrific stories befalling homeowners across the country. Patti Parker, a local attorney in Jacksonville, tells of a woman whose home was seized by Deutsche Bank two days before Christmas. Months later, Deutsche came back and admitted that they had made a mistake: They had repossessed the wrong property. In another case that made headlines in Orlando, an agent for JP Morgan mistakenly broke into a woman’s house that wasn’t even in foreclosure and tried to change the locks.
Terrified, the woman locked herself in her bathroom and called 911. But in a profound expression of the state’s reflexive willingness to side with the bad guys, the police made no arrest in the case. Breaking and entering is not a crime, apparently, when it’s authorized by a bank. The second reason the whole they still owe the fucking money thing is bogus has to do with the changed incentives in the mortgage game.
In many cases, banks like JP Morgan are merely the servicers of all these home loans, charged with collecting your money every month and paying every penny of it into the trust, which is the real owner of your mortgage. If you pay less than the whole amount, JP Morgan is now obligated to pay the trust the remainder out of its own pocket. When you fall behind, your bank falls behind, too.
The only way it gets off the hook is if the house is foreclosed on and sold. That’s what this foreclosure crisis is all about: fleeing the scene of the crime. Add into the equation the fact that some of these big banks were simultaneously betting big money against these mortgages — Goldman Sachs being the prime example — and you can see that there were heavy incentives across the board to push anyone in trouble over the cliff. Things used to be different.
Asked what percentage of struggling homeowners she used to be able to save from foreclosure in the days before securitization, Charney is quick to answer. “Most of them,” she says. “I seldom came across a mortgage I couldn’t work out.” In Judge Soud’s court, I come across a shining example of this mindless rush to foreclosure when I meet Natasha Leonard, a single mother who bought a house in 2004 for $97,500. Right after closing on the home, Leonard lost her job. But when she tried to get a modification on the loan, the bank’s offer was not helpful. “They wanted me to pay $1,000,” she says. Which wasn’t exactly the kind of modification she was hoping for, given that her original monthly payment was $840. “You’re paying $840, you ask for a break, and they ask you to pay $1,000?” I ask. “Right,” she says. Leonard now has a job and could make some kind of reduced payment.
But instead of offering loan modification, the bank’s lawyers are in their fourth year of doggedly beating her brains out over minor technicalities in the foreclosure process. That’s fine by the lawyers, who are collecting big fees. And there appears to be no human being at the bank who’s involved enough to issue a sane decision to end the costly battle. “If there was a real client on the other side, maybe they could work something out,” says Charney, who is representing Leonard. In this lunatic bureaucratic jungle of securitized home loans issued by transnational behemoths, the borrower-lender relationship can only go one of two ways: full payment, or total war. The extreme randomness of the system is exemplified by the last case I see in the rocket docket. While most foreclosures are unopposed, with homeowners not even bothering to show up in court to defend themselves, a few pro se defendants — people representing themselves — occasionally trickle in. At one point during Judge Soud’s proceeding, a tallish blond woman named Shawnetta Cooper walks in with a confused look on her face. A recent divorcee delinquent in her payments, she has come to court today fully expecting to be foreclosed on by Wells Fargo. She sits down and takes a quick look around at the lawyers who are here to kick her out of her home. “The land has been in my family for four generations,” she tells me later. “I don’t want to be the one to lose it.” Judge Soud pipes up and inquires if there’s a plaintiff lawyer present; someone has to lop off this woman’s head so the court can move on to the next case. But then something unexpected happens: It turns out that Kessler is supposed to be foreclosing on her today, but he doesn’t have her folder.
The plaintiff, technically, has forgotten to show up to court. Just minutes before, I had watched what happens when defendants don’t show up in court: kerchunk! The judge more or less automatically rules for the plaintiffs when the homeowner is a no-show. But when the plaintiff doesn’t show, the judge is suddenly all mercy and forgiveness. Soud simply continues Cooper’s case, telling Kessler to get his shit together and come back for another whack at her in a few weeks. Having done this, he dismisses everyone. Stunned, Cooper wanders out of the courtroom looking like a person who has stepped up to the gallows expecting to be hanged, but has instead been handed a fruit basket and a new set of golf clubs.
I follow her out of the court, hoping to ask her about her case. But the sight of a journalist getting up to talk to a defendant in his kangaroo court clearly puts a charge into His Honor, and he immediately calls Cooper back into the conference room. Then, to the amazement of everyone present, he issues the following speech: “This young man,” he says, pointing at me, “is a reporter for Rolling Stone. It is your privilege to talk to him if you want.” He pauses. “It is also your privilege to not talk to him if you want.” I stare at the judge, open-mouthed. Here’s a woman who still has to come back to this guy’s court to find out if she can keep her home, and the judge’s admonition suggests that she may run the risk of pissing him off if she talks to a reporter. Worse, about an hour later, April Charney, the lawyer who accompanied me to court, receives an e-mail from the judge actually threatening her with contempt for bringing a stranger to his court. Noting that “we ask that anyone other than a lawyer remain in the lobby,” Judge Soud admonishes Charney that “your unprofessional conduct and apparent authorization that the reporter could pursue a property owner immediately out of Chambers into the hallway for an interview, may very well be sited [sic] for possible contempt in the future.”
Let’s leave aside for a moment that Charney never said a word to me about speaking to Cooper. And let’s overlook entirely the fact that the judge can’t spell the word cited. The key here isn’t this individual judge — it’s the notion that these hearings are not and should not be entirely public.
Quite clearly, foreclosure is meant to be neither seen nor heard. After Soud’s outburst, Cooper quietly leaves the court. Once out of sight of the judge, she shows me her file. It’s not hard to find the fraud in the case. For starters, the assignment of mortgage is autographed by a notorious robo-signer — John Kennerty, who gave a deposition this summer admitting that he signed as many as 150 documents a day for Wells Fargo. In Cooper’s case, the document with Kennerty’s signature on it places the date on which Wells Fargo obtained the mortgage as May 5th, 2010.
The trouble is, the bank bought the loan from Wachovia — a bank that went out of business in 2008. All of which is interesting, because in her file, it states that Wells Fargo sued Cooper for foreclosure on February 22nd, 2010. In other words, the bank foreclosed on Cooper three months before it obtained her mortgage from a nonexistent company. There are other types of grift and outright theft in the file. As is typical in many foreclosure cases, Cooper is being charged by the bank for numerous attempts to serve her with papers. But a booming industry has grown up around fraudulent process servers; companies will claim they made dozens of attempts to serve homeowners, when in fact they made just one or none at all. Who’s going to check? The process servers cover up the crime using the same tactic as the lenders, saying they lost the original summons.
From 2000 to 2006, there was a total of 1,031 “affidavits of lost summons” here in Duval County; in the past two years, by contrast, more than 4,000 have been filed. Cooper’s file contains a total of $371 in fees for process service, including one charge of $55 for an attempt to serve process on an “unknown tenant.” But Cooper’s house is owner-occupied — she doesn’t even have a tenant, she tells me with a shrug. If Mark Kessler had had his shit together in court today, Cooper would not only be out on the street, she’d be paying for that attempt to serve papers to her nonexistent tenant.
Cooper’s case perfectly summarizes what the foreclosure crisis is all about. Her original loan was made by Wachovia, a bank that blew itself up in 2008 speculating in the mortgage market. It was then transferred to Wells Fargo, a megabank that was handed some $50 billion in public assistance to help it acquire the corpse of Wachovia. And who else benefited from that $50 billion in bailout money? Billionaire Warren Buffett and his Berkshire Hathaway fund, which happens to be a major shareholder in Wells Fargo. It was Buffett’s vice chairman, Charles Munger, who recently told America that it should “thank God” that the government bailed out banks like the one he invests in, while people who have fallen on hard times — that is, homeowners like Shawnetta Cooper — should “suck it in and cope.”
Look: It’s undeniable that many of the people facing foreclosure bear some responsibility for the crisis. Some borrowed beyond their means. Some even borrowed knowing they would never be able to pay off their debt, either hoping to flip their houses right away or taking on mortgages with low initial teaser rates without bothering to think of the future. The culture of take-for-yourself-now, let-someone-else-pay-later wasn’t completely restricted to Wall Street. It penetrated all the way down to the individual consumer, who in some cases was a knowing accomplice in the bubble mess. But many of these homeowners are just ordinary Joes who had no idea what they were getting into.
Some were pushed into dangerous loans when they qualified for safe ones. Others were told not to worry about future jumps in interest rates because they could just refinance down the road, or discovered that the value of their homes had been overinflated by brokers looking to pad their commissions. And that’s not even accounting for the fact that most of this credit wouldn’t have been available in the first place without the Ponzi-like bubble scheme cooked up by Wall Street, about which the average homeowner knew nothing — hell, even the average U.S. senator didn’t know about it. At worst, these ordinary homeowners were stupid or uninformed — while the banks that lent them the money are guilty of committing a baldfaced crime on a grand scale.
These banks robbed investors and conned homeowners, blew themselves up chasing the fraud, then begged the taxpayers to bail them out. And bail them out we did: We ponied up billions to help Wells Fargo buy Wachovia, paid Bank of America to buy Merrill Lynch, and watched as the Fed opened up special facilities to buy up the assets in defective mortgage trusts at inflated prices. And after all that effort by the state to buy back these phony assets so the thieves could all stay in business and keep their bonuses, what did the banks do?
They put their foot on the foreclosure gas pedal and stepped up the effort to kick people out of their homes as fast as possible, before the world caught on to how these loans were made in the first place. Why don’t the banks want us to see the paperwork on all these mortgages? Because the documents represent a death sentence for them.
According to the rules of the mortgage trusts, a lender like Bank of America, which controls all the Countrywide loans, is required by law to buy back from investors every faulty loan the crooks at Countrywide ever issued. Think about what that would do to Bank of America’s bottom line the next time you wonder why they’re trying so hard to rush these loans into someone else’s hands. When you meet people who are losing their homes in this foreclosure crisis, they almost all have the same look of deep shame and anguish.
Nowhere else on the planet is it such a crime to be down on your luck, even if you were put there by some of the world’s richest banks, which continue to rake in record profits purely because they got a big fat handout from the government. That’s why one banker CEO after another keeps going on TV to explain that despite their own deceptive loans and fraudulent paperwork, the real problem is these deadbeat homeowners who won’t pay their F-ing bills. And that’s why most people in this country are so ready to buy that explanation. Because in America, it’s far more shameful to owe money than it is to steal it.
Source: Rollingstone.com/This article appeared in the November 25, 2010 issue of Rolling Stone.
The issue is available in the online archive.

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE / LAND GRAB SOLUTIONS

]]><![CDATA[Tucker/Putin Shock The World! + Biden Implodes Addressing The Nation!! 25th Amendment NOW!!!!]]>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:02:20 GMThttps://www.newhumannewearthcommunities.com/end-the-fraud/tuckerputin-shock-the-world-biden-implodes-addressing-the-nation-25th-amendment-now

Tucker Carlson broke the internet and liberals by interviewing Putin from Russia on his site and X last night. We will have LOTS of commentary about this two hour long interview. Also, the investigation is complete in Joe Biden's handling of classified documents and just like we expected....No charges! BUT, The reason was due to Biden being an "elderly" man with no memory. Biden addressed the Nation to defend himself and ended up making things worse by mixing up Mexico and Egypt!
Follow us on IG and X:
@Grahamallen1
@toddspears1776
@mex_i_cantony
https://rumble.com/c/GrahamAllenOfficial

]]><![CDATA[12 Presumptions Against You In US Courts That Must Be Challenged (Video)]]>Sun, 14 Aug 2022 20:21:41 GMThttps://www.newhumannewearthcommunities.com/end-the-fraud/12-presumptions-against-you-in-us-courts-that-must-be-challenged-video

Did you know that there are 12 presumptions against you when you enter any court in the united States? These are devastating to you unless you challenged them. Ron Gibson, a lawyer for more than 50 years, joins me to explain these presumptions and why you must argue against them. He’ll also explain the difference between having a lawyer and having an attorney.
**Please excuse the “ticking” sound when Ron is speaking. It appears it has something to do with his speakers. The information is vital for you to learn and know.

https://rumble.com/embed/v1d3uvr/?pub=4

https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/12-presumptions-against-you-in-us-courts-that-must-be-challenged-video/

HOW TO WIN IN COURT LEGAL REMEDIES FAST

]]><![CDATA[For the Record - Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II]]>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:55:49 GMThttps://www.newhumannewearthcommunities.com/end-the-fraud/for-the-record-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-at-the-end-of-world-war-ii

By Anna Von Reitz

There is more than enough evidence to prove that whatever hopped-up fire-bombing occurred at Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II, it was not a nuclear bomb and not a nuclear disaster. Somehow, perfectly sane people, including physicists, have failed to note the radioactive half-life of the isotopes involved.

If the bombs unleashed at Hiroshima or Nagasaki had actually been nuclear bombs, those cities and a large bit of the countryside around them would be dead and uninhabitable as a result of nuclear pollution and that pollution would remain for tens of thousands of years---- like Sodom and Gemorrah, not like Hiroshima and Nagasaki today.

There would also be evident vitrification of the soil and subsoil at least two meters down.

So, we have another Big Lie to face up to and it's not a matter of "National Security". National Shame and money laundering is more like it.

I don't believe in nuclear weapons in the sense that the popular notion of "nuclear explosion" has it, but I do believe in nuclear pollution---and the deadly effects that radioactive isotopes can have on biological systems. Fukushima, the reactor, not a bomb, is creating exactly this horrendous scenario in the Pacific Ocean.

Radio-isotopes are very silent, effective, and long-lived biological poisons.

That's why the pollution caused by including "spent" nuclear fuel in the payloads of bombs used during recent wars in the Mideast is a war crime against humanity and against the Earth---- a crime against our soldiers and a crime against the civilian populace of the Middle East where this heinous thing was done.

That in itself is more than enough reason to summon an International War Crimes Tribunal to Nuremberg.

Similarly, it is the pollution potentially caused by a nuclear "dirty bomb" that is implied by the Baby Boomer bombs ---- not just physical explosive destruction which could be caused by any combination of metallic firebomb materials including Thermite, powdered Barium, etc.

The advantage to these monsters in the use of dirty bomb technology is that it helps prevent/preclude recovery of surviving records and examination of the bomb site. I hope that those promoting this scheme will now realize that the records will still exist and are still safe no matter what they do to the record repositories in Kansas and Colorado.

Also, the important records had already been removed from the Kansas repository, so that tells us right there that someone knew something and that the records had already been cashiered, stolen, or otherwise transported for purposes unknown by persons unknown. A big nasty explosion with radioactive fallout would seal the site and provide an excuse for the theft to remain undetected and provide an excuse to say that the records had been destroyed.

Just like 911.

The rats are not having a good week. And I personally hope it gets even hotter for them.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

Restoring Lawful Government
The American States Assmbiles

Reader Supported Truth and Education

Support Our Work

]]><![CDATA[#TheStorm How to prepare for a global corruption purge?]]>Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:05:50 GMThttps://www.newhumannewearthcommunities.com/end-the-fraud/thestorm-how-to-prepare-for-a-global-corruption-purge

By Anonymous,
In the last few weeks, my thoughts have drifted towards the events of this autumn that are going to shake our world. We have seen all the pieces being put in place for a mass justice event in the USA — the like of which has never been encountered before.
I wish to share a few thoughts on how you might go about preparing for the “expected unexpected”.
Large scale change happens
It is not a novel insight to point out that major geopolitical change is an ongoing process. Key events in living memory include:

1970s — oil shock; Vietnam War
1980s — deregulation; sudden end of the Soviet empire
1990s — Gulf War; dotcom boom and bust
2000s — 9/11 + Iraq War; financial collapse

Here, in the late 2010s, it is arguable that we are seeing the decline and end of Globalism, together with many supporting institutions and doctrines. Whilst the counter-trend is labeled Nationalism by the media, it is better seen as anti-authoritarianism. The demand is for power be held closer to the people, rather than by an unaccountable political establishment.
Anti-globalism is the narrative that joins together otherwise seemingly disparate events — mass protests in Hong Kong, Brexit in the UK, a “cold” civil war in France, a new government in Brazil, and the Trump administration in the USA. Working people are tired of extreme wealth disparities, declining standards of living, and mass migration causing cultural upheaval.
Most of all, ordinary people demand an end to their exploitation through endemic corruption. Specifically, a two-tier justice system has evolved where a privileged class can easily evade consequences for their thieving behavior. This powerful stateless mafia — which controls many important political, financial, media and industrial institutions — now faces removal and justice.
Corruption: the world’s biggest industry
We have seen a number of corruption scandals break recently, including:

Pharma — illegal pushing of addictive opiates to the public
Banking — LIBOR scandal, US mortgage fraud, 1MDB in Malaysia that may take down Goldman Sachs by the time it’s done
Industrials — huge accounting fraud at GE
Google — involvement in espionage and treason on behalf of China
Hollywood — Weinstein is a foretaste of its (child) rape culture being exposed
Social Media — large-scale rigging of elections
Catholic Church — the cover-up of child abuse

Now that the Mueller investigation has collapsed into nothing of consequence, there are at least six major scandals about to break in Washington DC:

Pedogate — Epstein Island and the blackmail operations associated with it (NXIVM, SNCTM); UK royal family’s involvement plus MI6; Israel and Mossad’s dirty role; Hollywood’s elite (notably at Disney) are up to their necks in this filth.
Spygate — Obama personally authorizing illegal FISA spying on the Trump administration, before and after the election. Draws FVYE spy network nations into the scandal, especially Britain.
Russiagate failed coup attempt — Brennen, Clapper, Comey, Ohr, etc. — are all going to hang for treason. Italy has already cleaned house on this one, having been implicated in the set-up.
Election fraud in 2016 and 2018 by Democratic party (and for many years before). May trigger the unseating of many in the House and special elections.
Clinton Foundation — sale of state secrets to China; Haiti human trafficking (cf Epstein).
Uranium One — illegal sale of US nuclear material to Russia (which draws Mueller into his own scandal…).

Corruption is a widespread phenomenon. Anti-corruption initiatives have a long history. Multinational business has been a thing for centuries. That there might be a coordinated multi-country corruption purge should not be a matter of great controversy.
It is the confluence of so many simultaneous major scandals that is what gives #TheStorm its moniker and “black swan” outlier status. It will sweep away some compromised institutions, and put many previously untouchable people in jail. This is a paradigm change in government and business, restoring trust and honor that have been missing for decades.

The end of the American ‘Deep State’
Whether it has been the East India Company, the Venetians, or the Spanish in South America, international trade has always allied to intelligence gathering — and trodden a fine line between legitimate commerce and organized crime (e.g. the opium wars, theft of gold).
To understand #TheStorm we need to recognize that the problem of a two-tier justice system itself comes from transnational crime cartels. Corruption has its own business model, strategies, and organizational design patterns. “Institutionalised crime” syndicates are often of a military-like nature, with power coming from spying, clandestine operations, subversion, esoteric science, and deception.
That power is tied to specific families and secret societies, many being in Europe and Asia. From its founding, the United States has been fighting against fifth columnists, who were often working on behalf of European banking, aristocratic, and religious powers. They have used their military intelligence networks to infiltrate American institutions and install their own people — who often become celebrated as quintessentially “American” in the process!

Three notable and well-documented events from the 1940s-1970s paint the contextual picture:

Operation Paperclip imported thousands of key members of the German Nazi regime into important scientific, academic and military posts after WW2.
Operation Northwoods showed the (corrupted) US Government was willing to use “false flag” attacks by its military against its own people for its geopolitical ends.
Operation Mockingbird weaponized the US mass media against its own population, using agents who were covertly under the control of the CIA, a rogue intelligence agency under criminal leadership.

An unconstitutional private central bank — the Federal Reserve — was able to print as much money as necessary to bribe whoever it saw fit. This funded the activities of allied crooked banks, media companies, and military-industrial corporations. Collectively these “Deep State” actors over time compromised the US judicial, legal, and political systems — and subverted the Constitution.

Trump’s de facto military government
Once civilian institutions are too compromised, the only remaining way of peacefully reversing these changes is via the military. Trump is far more than a figurehead, but to focus on him alone is to miss the big picture. He is the most visible part of a multi-decade Patriot plan to retake the country from the bankster criminals, and give it back to its people.
The Trump administration explicitly advertises itself as not just another 4-year election cycle — “Our movement is about replacing a failed and corrupt political establishment with a new Government controlled by you the American people.” It would be wise to take Trump and his generals very literally when they state their intentions, as their lives are on the line.
You can see Trump’s closeness to the military with:

His inauguration — where he unusually and symbolically had soldiers appear behind him.
Choices of personnel, being surrounded by generals, especially from the Marines.
The famous “calm before the storm” remark, as he is often pictured with his senior military team on social occasions.
Focus on celebrating the military and its independence from foreign control for the 4th July celebrations this year.
His links to Admiral Rogers and General Flynn who know where the bodies are buried and have been involved in the resulting intrigue.

A deeply embedded crime network has had effective control over the US DoJ, FBI, and CIA — as illustrated by the Clintons’ magical escapes from justice. A similar purge of corruption and taming of the Federal Reserve was attempted under JFK, and failed. The protection of the President can only come from a loyal military.
The “Q” programme of open source intelligence to bypass the compromised mass media is further evidence that this is a de facto military government with a civilian varnish. The legal and justice systems are being cleaned up, and the “pioneer public” primed for stunning revelations that will shake the foundations of society.

#TheStorm is about to make landfall
Sessions, Durham, Huber, Horowitz, Rosenstein, Barr — there are objective reasons to believe that large DoJ legal teams have been quietly working for a considerable period under these leaders. Their task is to indict those responsible for the scandals listed earlier. The job of some of these teams is complete, according to the DoJ website.
There has already been a record-breaking surge of indictments, arrests, and convictions for human trafficking. There has also been extensive building work done at Guantanamo Bay, and a new senior judge has been appointed for military tribunals there. There is an enabling executive order on courts-martial, and federal capital punishment has been reinstated. The President has made many proclamations on the treasonous nature of the offenses, and that they must never recur.
What is going to happen in late 2019 and into early 2020 is that multiple connected scandals are all going to break in fast succession. They will involve crimes against humanity, and horrors we had hoped had ended with the Nazis, Chairman Mao, or Pol Pot. A recurring theme from insider leaks is that the trials are going to be televised as a kind of “Nuremberg 2.0”.
Trump is not a politician. #TheStorm is not politics. This is about fixing the framework in which politics happens. #TheStorm is a restoration of the American Republic under control of its citizens, and the Constitutional rule of law. The conspiracies against the people are very real, and their prosecution is now inevitable.

Who else? What else? Where else?
These events are going to be a shock to most of the public, who have been lulled into complacency by a media conspiracy of silence. They will be scared and confused, since they will not know whom to trust, how bad the situation has been, or whether it is sufficiently contained.
Now is the time that forward-looking leaders can begin to prepare, so you can honestly state that this is on your radar, and you are taking proactive steps to manage the situation. There is ample evidence of this being a very real and serious situation, and to ignore it is irresponsible.
We can be reasonably certain that the following will experience major impacts from #TheStorm:

Political foundations that are used to launder bribes and payoffs (e.g. under the cover of “book deals”).
Charities that are nothing of the kind, being covers for illegal activities.
NGOs that have a covert purpose (e.g. Red Cross involvement in organ harvesting plus human trafficking).
Multi-national corporations who are using slave labor, or have operations in certain politically risky countries (e.g. Apple being forced to repatriate manufacturing from China).
Financial industry players, with many banks having large fraud liabilities. It is no secret that some like Bank of America, Citibank, HSBC, Wells Fargo, and Deutsche Bank face trouble, having over-indulged in nefarious business practices.
The media industry, which faces a cataclysmic loss of trust by the public as its past misdeeds and methods get exposed to the light.
Telecoms and IT, which is the foundation for a great deal of espionage. Amazon is tainted by its CIA associations; Google faces a total brand meltdown.
Energy, as a great deal of corruption is tied to oil and gas extraction and commodity trading, as well as the push for renewables driven by illegitimate concerns.

#TheStorm will reveal three scams that are each trillions of dollars in scope that will further damage the reputation of the media, academia, government, and religious bodies:

War-for-profit (drawing in banks, the arms industry, and public and private intelligence agencies).
Carbon tax (there is no “climate emergency”).
Fraud through foreign aid.

So what and what next?
This is a “trust apocalypse”: those who you were taught were most worthy of trust will repeatedly be proven to have betrayed it. Conversely, you will discover who the truly trustworthy are, as the lies and scams are exposed.
Confronting something of this magnitude in our own lifetimes can seem rather daunting. The MBA strategy books focus mainly on the positive creation of value in the legitimate economy. Where we touch on fraud and crime it comes clearly boundaried in topics like “revenue assurance” and “business continuity planning”.
The collapse of a longstanding massive network of organized crime that intersects with every sector isn’t something we have a precedent for. There isn’t a chapter for this kind of scenario in the textbooks. We just know that the November 2020 election cycle is a forcing function: the “swamp” needs to be exposed before then — so that the public is clamoring for total drainage.
To deal with this situation, here are some initial suggestions as to how you can take action now:

Get your own personal affairs in order as a hygiene factor. You can’t be sorting out other people’s problems if your own are a distraction. Clear the decks of anything optional or troublesome.
Set your moral compass now. Those who thrive post-Storm will have different values to those who prospered before it. Be very clear with yourself what you and your organization truly stand for, and what isn’t changing and is non-negotiable.
Expand your information sources. The mass media has become compromised by decades of infiltration and corruption. They are complicit in serious crime, if only via a conspiracy of silence, and cannot tell you the whole story. You need to look to alternative sources of journalism and analysis for an accurate picture.
Build your human network. Consider creating a temporary and informal organization to track and make sense of these changes. Use a “who knows, who cares, who can” model to draw in those sufficiently informed, motivated and resourced to act voluntarily and on their own initiative.
Manage your exposure. Start to manage your risk of exposure to Deep State aligned companies and sectors. Think about the most important business contracts you have and whether they are robust enough for this kind of outlier business event. Begin to plan contingencies for disruptions on both your supply and demand sides.
NATURAL LAW TRUST - ASSET PROTECTION FOR PEACEFUL PEOPLE
Map the possible opportunities. This is going to be a one-off opportunity to acquire talent from tainted institutions, buy up businesses at distressed prices, and occupy vacated market roles whose previous holders have been razed by #TheStorm. Making good enough moves quickly is likely to beat waiting for perfect certainty. Start making your shopping list today.

Reader Supported Truth and Education

Support Our Work

Food Security

]]><![CDATA[The Biggest Scam in America]]>Fri, 05 Jul 2019 21:55:14 GMThttps://www.newhumannewearthcommunities.com/end-the-fraud/the-biggest-scam-in-america

The Take Your Life Back Solution
Liberty Debit Elimination System
100% Success Rate

]]><![CDATA[Situation Recap Report and Resolution - Anna Von Reitz - Living Law Firm]]>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 14:13:39 GMThttps://www.newhumannewearthcommunities.com/end-the-fraud/situation-recap-report-and-resolution-anna-von-reitz-living-law-firm

By Anna Von Reitz

The two remaining branches of the original Federal Government are playing war games on our shores in contravention of their duties and contractual obligations.

They are secretively preying upon Americans via various means of fraud which they have attempted to excuse by deliberately engaging in the following actions: (1) falsification of records; (2) identity theft; (3) secretive unilateral contracting processes serving to confer opposing citizenship obligations -- so that Americans are presumed to be both Territorial United States Citizens and Municipal Citizens of the United States, when in fact they are neither; (4) confiscation of assets based on a phony interpretation of the Trading With the Enemy Act; (5) holding of assets based on a phony interpretation of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's First Inaugural Address; (6) misdirection and corruption of the Judicial Branches of the respective Territorial and Municipal Government corporations to secure enforcement for all the above crock of horse hooey.

So, it is apparent to us and it should be apparent to everyone reading this, that the entire country has been run amok by two competing commercial corporations, both of which are operating as crime syndicates in gross violation of their treaty and commercial contract obligations.

It should also be apparent that their criminality is orchestrated and purposeful, and that they have colluded together to produce a single desired result: the rape and pillaging of the American States and People that they are all sworn to protect and defend, and the avoidance of the limitations of the Constitutional Agreements that permit the existence of these corporations and their presence on our shores.

The duty which the Roman Curia owes the entire world is to prevent this kind of thing from happening and to promptly liquidate any corporation caught engaging in unlawful activity. They created all these corporate entities --- thought them up out of thin air and gave them form; they thus remain responsible for them.

So, they shuffled off the assets of the Municipal Corporation doing business as the UNITED STATES, INC., left the victims on the hook as Presumed Co-Signers of its debts, and allowed the same perpetrators to boot up numerous new corporations which have offered to continue on with business as usual, promoting the same frauds, and operating in the same way as the UNITED STATES, INC.

The IRS for example, simply moved its Headquarters from Puerto Rico to the Northern Mariana Islands, and snugged down, ready to continue on beating and fleecing Americans under the same false presumptions of Municipal Citizenship and under the same old tired excuse of relocating the Municipal PERSONS to a United States Commonwealth where they can be prosecuted under the Spanish Law of the Inquisition.

Their remedy has fallen far short of what the victims of this perfidy are owed and thus far presents nothing but another fraud and another con game that obeys the letter, but not the spirit or intent of the Ecclesiastical Law, and which immediately engages the new corporations in the sins of their predecessors--- all without any relief to the victims of these crimes who are in fact the Priority Creditors of these corporations.

They have also failed to liquidate the holdings of Her Royal Majesty, the British Territorial Government, and those of the Lord Mayor of London and the Government of Westminster, all of which have exercised the privilege of issuing incorporation charters and allowed the resulting corporations to operate as crime syndicates. By international agreement, the Pope retains the ability to liquidate these monstrosities as well, and owes it to the American States and People to do so without further adieu.

The Territorial and Municipal Corporations have all trespassed in a criminal and
coordinated fashion and committed capital crimes against their employers, the American States and People. They deserve to be liquidated and all their assets returned to their Priority Creditors -- the same American States and People who have been harmed and victimized by these crimes.

Our agreements with the Pope, Her Majesty, and Westminster are very clear and do not allow such Breach of Trust and legal chicanery. Mr. Trump and his Administration have been and are being fully informed regarding these issues and all Parties concerned worldwide are being called upon to put an end to these outrages and return the purloined property to the rightful owners.

This is nothing more or less than the exercise of international and commercial law and its requirements, well-agreed upon for hundreds of years. The claim that hundreds of millions of Americans have "voluntarily" and knowingly embarked on careers as British Merchant Marine Warrant Officers is ludicrous.
The claim that we are "missing, presumed dead" is equally ludicrous.

We have been deliberately scammed, misinformed, defrauded by dishonest employees, have suffered identity theft, have been robbed, pillaged and plundered by mercenary pirates, and in all ways abused in Bad Faith by the Popes and the British Monarchs and the Lord Mayors of Westminster, who have pretended to be our Friends and Allies, and who have instead acted in Gross Breach of Trust and violation of commercial contract obligations that we are clearly owed.

Giving their own lackeys our property is not relief nor is it remedy for this circumstance and any continued pretension that it is, will be met with instantaneous rebuttal. Creating a Revolving Door where one corporation is shut down for criminal activity and another corporation operated under a slightly different name or with a different headquarters is allowed to resume the same criminal activity, is not an answer.

We insist that the American States and People be fully recognized and their political status be honored. We insist that our property be returned to us free and clear and unencumbered by foreign debt. We insist that all right, title, and interest naturally belonging to us be returned to us. We insist that our employees cease and desist all false claims and false citizenship presumptions and render Good Faith Service instead.

We can read the historical record, the Territorial Code, and the Municipal Code for what it actually says. We are not confused by Doublespeak. We are not confused about the identity, function, or administration of either the United States nor the United States of America, and their relationship to The United States and The United States of America, respectively.

If the Pope and the Queen and the Lord Mayor expect us to honor our obligations under the Constitutional Agreements and the international law, they must also honor theirs---- and not via some oblique mockery of substituting one criminally misdirected commercial corporation for another criminally misdirected commercial corporation with the intention of continuing to promote crime against the American States and People.

We wish the Internal Revenue Service and the IRS to be completely and permanently reformed. We wish for these organizations to be re-directed and enabled to modernize their delivery of credit that is owed to the American States and People via application of our exemptions and Mutual Offset Credit Exchanges we are owed.

We deny the Territorial United States Congress and the Municipal United States Congress any ability to pass Flat Taxes or Sales Taxes "for" us, and we deny their franchise operations any ability to pass or enforce Property Taxes on our private property assets, which are all due return and revenue.

A grotesque and profound Breach of Trust and international law has occurred here and no succor can be afforded to the guilty parties on the basis of any "law of necessity" or the existence of any "war powers" exercised on our behalf to justify our destruction. We have our own recourse to the law of necessity and as a sovereign government, we have the lawful ability to enforce the Public Law upon all and any perpetrators and promoters of these crimes on our shores.

Resolution:

1. The National Credit owed to the American States and People must be made available to them, and their public and private property assets must be lawfully conveyed and officially re-venued without recourse to any presumptions otherwise.

2. Peace must be declared with respect to the land and soil of our country and peace between the Territorial and Municipal United States while operating on our shores or in our Territories and Insular Possessions must also be maintained. We are not putting up with any more pretensions of "commercial warfare" on our shores, in our Territories, or in our Insular Possessions. This country has been at peace since 1814 and for everyone's sake, it is best that it remain so.

3. All Federal Service Providers and all Federal Franchise States of States and Agency Subcontractors must be brought into alignment and compliance with the respective Constitutions and Service Agreements owed to the American States and People, together with their guarantees and limitations, without delay.

4. The conscription apparatus put in place by the British Territorial Government to entrap and arbitrarily confer Territorial United States Citizenship on Americans must be dismantled and subscribed to the Dust Bin of history. This includes all registration of births and all retention of all false claims based upon such registrations. The registration and securitization of living flesh using the pretense of non-existent citizenship obligations is forbidden by both international law and scripture and has no place in America.

5. The corollary apparatus put in place by the Municipal United States Government used to create bogus Cestui Que Vie Trusts and Public Transmitting Utilities and Public Charitable Trust ACCOUNTS must also be reformed. Hundreds of millions of innocent people have suffered probate fraud as a result of these activities and a mighty correction is long overdue.

6. No foreign government is allowed nor entitled to confer citizenship upon anyone born in the States of the Union and no pretense or excuse may be offered for this circumstance in which the Hired Help have deliberately mis-characterized and mis-identified Americans as either species of Federal Employee or Dependents or US Franchise Corporations and sought to entrap and persecute their Employers in Gross Breach of Trust.

7. The foreign governments responsible for this circumstance have employed fraud of various species throughout this process of misrepresentation and entrapment and both bankruptcy and probate fraud upon the courts has been employed. As fraud vitiates everything tainted by it, we exercise our Natural and Unalienable Rights and our Law of Necessity to invoke the Public Law and the Law of the Land owed to this country and we invoke the Grandfather Clause of all Acts of Congress since 1861, declaring ourselves free of any taint or obligation or crime committed by these foreign political lobbies deceitfully operating "in our names".

----------------------------

See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

The American States Assemblies

Reader Supported Truth and Education

Support Our Work

]]><![CDATA[NO Law Requires You To Register or Pledge Your Private Automobile | Pulled over today with no license, license plate, or registration]]>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 20:41:45 GMThttps://www.newhumannewearthcommunities.com/end-the-fraud/no-law-requires-you-to-register-or-pledge-your-private-automobile-pulled-over-today-with-no-license-license-plate-or-registration09/21/2015
By Justin Deschamps

There is a part of our world integrated by co-creative consciousness, a grand undertaking of many individuals all working together to effect a goal of epic proportions. This achievement of cooperation by the hands of a few dedicated individuals has transformed the planet and touched nearly everyone’s life to some degree.
The system I am speaking of is the legal system, the corporately framed and centrally maintained tapestry of treaties; agreements and contracts leading all the way back to none other then Rome. In past articles we discussed how the Vatican and it’s sitting Pope stand as the central nexus of corporate and legal power on Earth, under the Roman Curia ‘law’ system.

Related Pope ‘Ruler of the World’ to go after War Criminals?

Related The Underworld Death Dealing Practices Of The Elite | Birth, Marriage and Death Estate Are Seized and Traded By The Government

The Pope, and the office it has maintained over the centuries, has slowly enveloped the entire planet into a series of trusts enacted between 1350 and 1600 AD. These documents claim the Church and its high priest the pontiff, as the supreme ruler and trustee to the creator, reaching back to the alleged creation of the church by Peter during the times of Jesus. Once these trusts, known as the Cestui Que accounts were created, they merely needed to begin dispensing the ‘benefits’ of the trust to the people named in it, which in this case is all life on the planet Earth.

Shortly after their ratification, the Jesuit brotherhood began spreading across the globe ‘civilizing’ native peoples everywhere. Some claim that Christopher Columbus’ expedition was a Vatican led enterprise to conquer the people there and enfold them into the trust system.

Related Occult History and Legend of Christopher Columbus | Did The Vatican Papal Bulls Enable The Conquering Of The New World?

The following is a compilation of articles by Trent Goodbaudy, a pioneer in the freedom movement. He has been successfully traveling without a registration or drivers license for years now.
He was recently pulled over and had a very interesting exchange with the police, which I think reveals how close we are towards a grand shift in consciousness.
At first the police were combative, attempting to coerce Goodbaudy into a commercial contract; a citation or ticket. But after he politely explained to the police the lawful frauds that the state is committing through and by their actions, they revealed themselves to be ‘tea partiers’ and keenly interested in the things Goodbaudy was saying.
It seems that encased within their corporate costume was a real human being seeking the truth in their own way. I don’t know what will ultimately push us through a grand shift of consciousness, but knowing that at least these two individuals are interested in the frauds of our age is encouraging.
The remaining articles are elaborations on the legalities of a driver’s license and what the US statutory code actually says in that regard. Wouldn’t it be interesting to discover that there are volumes of statutes and case history supporting the lawful right to travel without taxation or harassment? Contained herein is a list of cases and codes that detail how we only need to dispel the presumptions of the corporate state in order to actually live in freedom. This can be enforced by a growing body of educated and active individuals.
The government presumes that we are employees, and it is only these entities which are subject to the codes of conduct for agents of corporatized UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Clearly if this one man can forge ahead alone, we can unify collectively and spread these ideas far and wide, expanding on and building off of the lawful concepts already codified within the system itself.

– Justin

Source – Freedom From Government
Pulled over today with no license, license plate, or registration
A CHP officer came up behind me today on 680N and turned his lights on, because I don’t have a plate, I knew he didn’t have a warrant.
I know I didn’t commit any Crime, so if I pulled over, it would be considered an “Arrest by Consent”. I continued to my exit, about 3/4 of a mile. On the exit the officer said “Pull over right here” through his loud speaker, I ignored him and continued to the light, turned my blinker, and turned. He repeated “pull over right now”, I continued on, and took a right and pulled into a church parking lot.California highway patrol gets it’s authority from the people!
The officer came to my passenger window, I immediately asked “Am I under arrest?”, he said “No”, I said, “So I’m free to go?”, he said “no”, I said “So I’m under arrest”, this time he said “yes”.
I told him that I did not consent to this arrest, and asked him if he had a warrant. He said no, and asked for my drivers license. I handed him my notarized secured party declaration, a copy of the bill of sale to the truck, and my proof of insurance. He went back to his car for about 5 minutes.
A sergeant showed up and took over. I asked him if I was arrested and he said “no”. I again said “So I can leave?” he said “no, you’re detained”. He started talking about arresting me and towing the truck and I asked under what authority. I told him I was on private property and I have not committed a crime. He agreed, but was playing tough guy.

He started asking me what was going on with my license, asked if I was ever licensed in California, and why the truck wasn’t registered. I explained all of my info, we read through the case law and cvc together, and both officers admitted that they were fascinated by this. Turns out they were anti-obama, anti-health care, and ‘tea partiers’ (who knows what type) but either way we made a connection.

I repeated that I have conviction and respect for the Constitution, and that I understand the codes and definitions. I reminded the officers that ALL ROADS in the United States have been deemed “channels of Interstate commerce” by the Supreme Court, and because of that, local and State laws are trumped by Federal Laws, and that in the Federal Laws a “Motor Vehicle” was a “Commercial Vehicle”…we were waiting for almost 30 minutes while they waited for word from their supervisors.
Eventually, they hand me a citation with “none” marked in the DL location, and “none” in the License Plate location. I asked him if I was required to sign it, and he said “yes, otherwise we have to take you to jail.”
This now made the signature “under duress”. I wrote “under duress” and signed my name next to the ticket. This is where I was surprised, the Officer said “hey, we never read you your Miranda rights, so anything we use against you in court is not admissible.” Im not sure if this is true, but I was intrigued. I have written “refused for fraud” across the original ticket, and sent it to the Court and the CHP with the letter below attached. I have done this in the past, and never heard another word, I had wondered if there were any warrants, apparently not!
*************************************
NOTICE and DEMAND ATTN: Certified Mail 7009 2820 0003 2274 8185 California Highway Patrol Golden Gate Division
Officer B. Knudsen DUBLIN (390)
4999 Gleason Road Dublin, CA 94568-3310
CC: Certified Mail 7009 2820 0003 2274 8192
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, THE
Also Traded as ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
5672 Stoneridge Drive
Pleasanton, CA 94588-8559

RE: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL Violation Number: 60435 LJ
This notice to appear was signed UNDER DURESS as evidenced by the original citation in possession of, or submitted by Officer B. Knudsen. Because this notice to appear was signed UNDER DURESS; 1) Statements made therein shall not be considered admissible evidence, 2) As a party to this action, I hereby void this contract and notice to appear, and 3) Any perceived consent or promise to appear is hereby withdrawn. If you, or any Officer of the court or Officer of the CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL disagrees with the facts or statements stated above, you must refute those items point by point within 10 days of receipt of this Notice, via sworn affidavit, under your full commercial liability, signing under penalty of perjury that the facts contained therein are true, correct, complete and not misleading. Mere declarations are an insufficient response, as declarations permit lying by omission and hearsay, which no honorable draft may contain. If an extension of time is needed to properly answer, please request it in writing. Failure to respond will be deemed agreement with the facts stated above and an inability to prove your claim.
_____________________________________
Non resident, non licensed and non registered pursuant to CVC 4, 17459, 17460 See: Edwards v. California, 314 US 160 (1941), Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579., Hertado v. California, 110 US 516 (Enclosed) Copy of Notice to Appear______________________________________

Source – Freedom From Government
NO Law Requires You To Register / Pledge Your Private Automobile
A Private automobile is not required by any law, code or statute to be registered. Any registering (pledge) of Private automobile to any agency is strictly voluntary. Any recordation / contract you or a Dealership has done was a fraudulently conveyed act as the registering agency/automobile Dealer told you that you must register your Private Property. The voluntary pledge that was done without just compensation is usually done through fraud, deceit, coercion and withholding of facts, which can only be construed as fraud and unjust enrichment by agency as well as a willful malicious act to unjustly enrich the recording agency and its public servants.

If men, through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being the gift of Almighty God, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave. – Samuel Adams , our former president.
“Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, – ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;’ and to ‘secure,’ not grant or create, these rights, governments are instituted. That property which a man has honestly acquired he retains full control of, subject to these limitations: first, that he shall not use it to his neighbor’s injury, and that does not mean that he must use it for his neighbor’s benefit: second, that if he devotes it to a public use, he gives to the public a right to control that use; and third, that whenever the public needs require, the public may take it upon payment of due compensation.” Budd v. People of State of New York , 143 U.S. 517 (1892).
There should be no arbitrary deprivation of life or liberty, or arbitrary spoilation of property. (Police power, Due Process ) Barber v. Connolly, 113 U.S. 27, 31; Yick Yo v. Hopkins , 118 U.S.356.

Constitution Guarantees And Protects The Right To Travel
But whenever the operation and effect of any general regulation is to extinguish or destroy that which by law of the land is the property of any person, so far as it has that effect, it is unconstitutional and void. Thus, a law is considered as being a deprivation of property within the meaning of this constitutional guaranty if it deprives an owner of one of its essential attributes, destroys its value, restricts or interrupts its common, necessary, or profitable use, hampers the owner in the application of it to the purposes of trade, or imposes conditions upon the right to hold or use it and thereby seriously impairs its value.
( Statute ) 167 Am. Jur. 2d, Constitutional Law, Section 369.
Constitutional Law § 101 – right to travel – 5.

The nature of the Federal Union and constitutional concepts of personal liberty unite to require that all citizens be free to travel throughout the length and breadth of the United States uninhibited by statutes, rules, or regulations which unreasonably burden or restrict this movement. 6. Although not explicitly mentioned in the Federal Constitution, the right freely to travel from one state to another is a basic right under the constitution.
Constitutional Law § 101 – law chilling assertion of rights – 7. If a law has no other purpose than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it is patently unconstitutional. Shapiro v Thompson , 394 US 618, 22 L Ed 2d 600, 89 S Ct 1322 . ‘ ” ” ‘
_______________________
Source – Freedom From Government

Duties of Government Officials
Justice Bandeis eloquently affirmed his condemnation of abuses practiced by Government officials, who were defendants, acting as Government officials. In the case of Olmstead vs. U.S. 277 US 438, 48 S.Ct. 564, 575; 72 L ED 944 (1928) he declared:

“Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that Government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the Citizen. In a Government of laws, existence of the Government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher.For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a law-breaker, it breads contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself. It invites anarchy. To declare that, in the administration of the law, the end justifies the means would bring a terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine, this Court should resolutely set its face.”

The information created and surrounding the stricti juris doctrine regarding a particular license which may, or may not, be represented by and revealed within the contents and control of a license agreement “but must be revealed upon demand, and failure to do so is concealment , a withholding of material facts (the enducing, contractual consideration) known by those who have a duty and are bound to reveal.” Dolcater v. Manufacturers S Traders Trust Co., D.C.N.Y., 2F.Supp. 637, 641.

Penalty Under The Law
Under USC Title 42 §1986 . Action for neglect to prevent . . ., it states: Every person who, having knowledge that any wrongs conspired or to be done. . . and having power to prevent or aid in preventing . . . Neglects or refuses so to do … shall be liable to the party injured… and; The means of “knowledge”, especially where it consists of public record is deemed in law to be “knowledge of the facts”. As the means of “knowledge” if it appears that the individual had notice or information of circumstances which would put him on inquiry, which, if followed, would lead to “knowledge”, or that the facts were presumptively within his knowledge, he will have deemed to have had actual knowledge of the facts and may be subsequently liable for any damage or injury. (Public Officials have been given “knowledge of the facts” as it pertains to this conspiracy to commit a fraud against the people.)

It would be unconstitutional for an officer to coerce one to waive a fundamental right: “waivers of fundamental Rights must be knowing, intentional, and voluntary acts, done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences. U.S. v. Brady , 397 U.S. 742 at 748 (1970); U.S.v. O’Dell , 160 F.2d 304 (6 th Cir. 1947)”. And that the agency committed fraud, deceit, coercion, willful intent to injure another, malicious acts, RICO activity and conspired by; Unconscionable “contract” – “One which no sensible man not under delusion, or duress, or in distress would make, and such as no honest and fair man would accept “; Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Noll 115 Ind. App. 289, 58 N.E.2d 947, 949, 950. and;”Party cannot be bound by contract that he has not made or authorized.” Alexander v.Bosworth (1915), 26 C.A. 589, 599, 147 P.607. And therefore; “Failure to reveal the material facts of a license or any agreement is immediate grounds for estoppel.” Lo Bue v. Porazzo , 48 Cal.App.2d 82, 1 19, p.2d 346, 348.

The fraudulently “presumed” quasi-contract us that binds the Declarant with the CITY/STATE agency, is void for fraud ab initio, since the de facto CITY/STATE cannot produce the material fact (consideration inducement) or the jurisdictional clause (who is subject to said statute) . (SEE: Master / Servant [Employee] Relationship — C.J.S .) — ” Personal, Private, Llberty “-
Since the “consideration” is the “life blood” of any agreement or quasi-agreement, (contractus) “… the absence of such from the record is a major manifestation of want of jurisdiction , since without evidence of consideration there can be no presumption of even a quasi-contract us . Such is the importance of a “consideration.” Reading R.R. Co. v. Johnson , 7 W & S (Pa.) 317 So without a Contract (no recording of the M.C.O.) or consideration there is no DMV / government etc. jurisdiction as the property does not “reside” in the colorable fictitious territory as evidenced in Supreme Court cite below:
In Wheeling Steel Corp v. Fox , 298 U.S. 193 (1936) it states: Property taxes can be on tangibles or intangibles. In order to have a situs for taxation (a basis for imposing the tax), tangible property (physical property) must reside within the territorial jurisdiction of the taxing authority, and intangibles . . .

Under USC Title 42 §1982 . Property rights of citizens further evidences the above position that the City or State cannot take land because they DO NOT have Jurisdiction. It states that federal or state governments / agencies MUST have a monetary or proprietary interest in your real private property in order to have jurisdiction over it (if your land has no government grant /funding or is not a subsidized government project, then agencies have neither). DEMAND any public servant/said agencies to provide the legal document that allows any federal or state agency to supercede and/or bypass Title 42 USC §1982 and/or §1441. Title 42 §1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights further protects Declarant’s private property. The State cannot diminish rights of the people. Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516. ‘ ‘

“To say that one may not defend his own property is usurpation of power by legislature.” O’Connell v. Judnich (192 5), 71 C.A.386, 235 P. 664.
“A state MAY NOT impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted (sic) by the Federal Constitution.” MURDOCH v PENNSYLVANIA , 319 US 105. “… THE POWER TO TAX INVOLVES THE POWER TO DESTROY”. McCULLOUGH v MARYLAND, 4 Wheat 316.
“All subjects over which the sovereign power of the state extends are objects of taxation, but those over which it does not extend are exempt from taxation. This proposition may almost be pronounced as self-evident. The sovereignty of the state extends to everything which exists by its authority or its permission.” McCullough v Maryland , 17 U.S. [4 Wheat] 316 (1819). ‘

U.S. adopted Common laws of England with the Constitution. Caldwell vs. Hill , 178 SE383 (1934).
To be that statutes which would deprive a citizen of the rights of person or property without a regular trial, according to the course and usage of common law , would not be the law of the land. ( Jury) Hoke v. Henderson , 1 5, N.C. 1 5 25 AM Dec 677.
“The phrase ‘ common law ‘ found in this clause, is used in contradistinction to equity, and admiralty , and maritime jurisprudence.” Parsons v. Bedford , et al, 3 Pet 433, 478-9.
_________

https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2015/09/no-law-requires-you-to-register-or/?spref=fb
Sources:

http://freedomfromgovernment.us/2015/09/16/pulled-over-today-with-no-license-license-plate-or-registration/

http://freedomfromgovernment.us/2015/09/18/no-law-requires-you-to-register-pledge-your-private-automobile/

http://freedomfromgovernment.us/2015/09/18/duties-of-government-officials/

NON-COMMERCIAL TRAVELER

Posted on June 7, 2019

by David Robinson
Weyman Cochran
Well, I’m walking the walk …
.Funny things started to happen quick … After the shop put it on, I went to take a picture (grabbed the wrong phone, it was dead) I heard a horn blow, looked and a deputy was driving by (oh boy), came back out from paying, and the deputy was pulling up, then he backed up and wrote something down then pulled back up … (oh boy, the only thing to do is go flush, DAMN IT!)
Ok, can’t sit here all day, so I backed around so he could see the back, as I pulled away I looked back and he was looking, grinning, and he waved! Ok, BREATHING….went about 4 miles then poof, got another behind me, he followed about 2 miles then passed me in a hurry …. My nerves are shot! Later I traveled to my daughter’s but spotted a roadblock …YES, I DIPPED OUT!
I’ve already had a heart attack and enough stress for one day!
But I’m ready …
LEGAL NOTICE AFFIDAVIT
County of Baldwin
State of Georgia
Notice to the principal is notice to the agent
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal
Be it known to all that I, Weyman P Cochran, own a 1994 Toyota Camry
Vin #JT2GK12E4R0015601, it is private property personal effects, consumer goods, not equipment. As per UCC 9-109 (1)
Under USC Title 42 §1982. Property rights of citizens …, further evidences the above position that the City or State cannot take land because DOES NOT have Jurisdiction. It states that federal or state governments/agencies MUST have a monetary or proprietary interest in your real private property in order to have jurisdiction over it (if your land has no government grant/funding or is not a subsidized government project, then agencies have neither). DEMAND any public servant/said agencies to provide the legal document that allows any federal or state agency to supersede and/or bypass Title 42 USC §1982 and/or §1441. Title 42 §1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights …., further protects Declarant’s private property.
“… In one of the so-called elevator cases, that of Munn v. Illinois,
94 U. S. 113, [24 L. Ed. 77], it is said: ‘When, therefore, one devotes
his property to a use in which the public have an interest, he in
effect grants to the public an interest in that use, and must submit to
be controlled by the public for the common good, to the extent of the
interest he has thus created.’ But so long as he uses his property for
private use, and in the absence of devoting it to public use, the
public has no interest therein which entitles it to a voice in its
control.
“The use to which an item is put, rather than its physical characteristics,
determine whether it should be classified as “consumer goods” under UCC 9-109(1) or “equipment” under UCC 9-109(2).” Grimes v Massey Ferguson, Inc., 23 UCC Rep Serv 655; 355 So.2d 338 (Ala., 1978).
“Under UCC 9-109 there is a real distinction between goods purchased for personal use and those purchased for business use. The two are mutually exclusive and the principal use to which the property is put should be considered as determinative.” James Talcott, Inc. v Gee, 5 UCC Rep Serv 1028; 266 Cal.App.2d 384, 72 Cal.Rptr. 168 (1968).
“The classification of goods in UCC 9-109 are mutually exclusive.” McFadden
v Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 8 UCC Rep Serv 766; 260 Md 601, 273
A.2d 198 (1971).
“Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, – ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;’ and to ‘secure,’ not grant or create, these rights, governments are instituted.
That property which a man has honestly acquired he retains full control of, subject to these limitations: first, that he shall not use it to his neighbor’s injury, and that does not mean that he must use it for his neighbor’s benefit: second, that if he devotes it to a public use, he gives to the public a right to control that use; and third, that whenever the public needs require, the public may take it upon payment of due compensation Budd v. People of State of New York, 143 U.S. 517 (1892).
“Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than according to the means by which they are propelled Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20. And;
“In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may”
exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis
means that they “must” exempt them.” State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 6 C.J.S. section 94 page 581.
As far as having it registered …
“A vehicle not used for commercial activity is a “consumer goods”, …it is NOT a vehicle that is REQUIRED to be REGISTERED under this code “Passenger vehicles which are not used for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation or profit, and house cars, are not commercial vehicles”, “a vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle” and; NOT the type of vehicle required to be registered and “use tax” paid of which the tab is evidence of receipt of the tax.” Bank of Boston vs Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14. And;
“It is held that a tax upon common carriers by motor vehicles is based upon a by reasonable classification, and does not involve any unconstitutional discrimination, although it does not apply to private vehicles, or those used the owner in his own business, and not for hire.” Desser v. Wichita, (1915) 96 Kan. 820; Iowa Motor Vehicle Asso. v. Railroad Comrs., 75 A.L.R. 22.
What must happen …
In view of this rule, a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may” exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis means that they “must” exempt them. State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 6 C.J.S. section 94 page 581.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this the _____ day of _______ in the year __________ by
____________________________________
Weyman Paul Cochran
W/O PREJUDICE UCC 1-308
_______________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires ___________
_________________________________________________________

SOURCE: https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2019/06/07/non-commercial-traveler/

REader Supported Truth and Education

Support Our Work

]]><![CDATA[The Birth Certificate, Cesta Que (Cestui Que Vie) Trust, “Justice System” and What Role We SHOULD Play]]>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 17:29:25 GMThttps://www.newhumannewearthcommunities.com/end-the-fraud/the-birth-certificate-cesta-que-cestui-que-vie-trust-justice-system-and-what-role-we-should-play11/03/2015
BY JUSTIN DESCHAMPS
SOURCE
The following is a compilation of articles, videos and research related to the Cestui Que Vie trust, Birth Certificate. In my view, this is essential to understand how the legal system is fraudulent in its application of justice. But oddly enough, it is also a way to understand how a truly honorable system can work, if we only seek to understand and live the principles of truth and trust.
What may not be clear is that all these systems of control and enslavement are actually based on core principles of Natural Law, as expressed in Equity or Contract Law and Trust Law. Where the system fails is in execution, actually following the principles of trust on which legal codes are founded. In most cases dishonorable legislation such as the Patriot Act, would have never been enacted if the people were fully aware of all the facts; full disclosure and transparency.
The system requires compliance and ignorance in order to suppress the rights of the people and maintain the illusion of justice. This is the only reason why most of humanity thinks the system works, despite being hopelessly inefficient, because they are decidedly ignorant of the whole truth. And by all accounts justice, as it is practiced today, has never been interested in following law or honoring trust. There are remedies on paper that individuals should be able to use, but even after one correctly asserts their rights, no remedy is rendered by the system; the law is ignored and courts breach trust as a matter of policy. This point cannot be overlooked.
Related U.S. Judges Are: Incompetent, Discriminatory and In Breach of Contract | A Documentary Script That Will Reveal The Fraud
Some in the freedom movement think that if we only say the right thing or file the correct paperwork, the system will be forced to comply with the law. But in truth, the system has never been designed for this, its designed to appear lawful; acting in the color of law. It is an illusion of justice. It is a for profit private enterprise that has usurped a once valid method of settling disputes, chiefly interested in deceiving and defrauding their patrons; the unwitting masses. At best it is a summary justice system, a type of ‘fast-food’ justice that offers the same deleterious effects on society as processed food has on health.
There are countless scores of knowledgeable people that follow the rules and procedures within the system, hoping to gain remedy and reclaim their status as sovereign individuals, but in most cases the system ignores valid claims and honorable arguments. Therefore, the only logical conclusion to draw is that there is in fact NO JUSTICE, NO RULE OF LAW and NO REMEDY for the people. No amount of paper work, protests, certified letters or official documentation will cause the system to begin acting honorably, because it has to do so for everyone if it is to be a truly just system.
A court, judge, or trustee that ignores the truth, by their very actions demonstrates the status of incompetency, negligence and lack of standing to hold the position they claim to represent. They are now in breach of trust and public contract, they have committed fraud and the only recourse a sovereign people have in the face of this is to embody honor and truth so as to replace the fallacious system. In the absence of legitimate government and true justice, the people’s justice reigns supreme; so we better do our best to ensure its honest and fair.
Related How the Cabal Maintains Their Power And What You Need To Do To Stop It – Un-Consent | Beyond BRICS: Exposing the Rats
Related NO Law Requires You To Register or Pledge Your Private Automobile | Pulled over today with no license, license plate, or registration
Despite these sobering points, there is hope. The people have always had the power to settle their own affairs honorably and in truth. But, when two sovereign individuals are unable to settle a dispute, a third party can be appointed by them to assist in the matter; this is ostensibly the role of a Justice System. A beings ability to seek the truth and act compassionately and acknowledge others is what defines a sovereign being.
“Do no harm and cause no damage to property”
This common sense policy has been called the golden rule of law, and it is the foundation of every system of justice on Earth; including the defunct ones that now run rampant. But what if we encounter someone who is unwilling to act honorably? This is when a defensive action can be taken to ensure we are not harmed, but we must also ensure that this action does not cause harm in return. Eye for an eye justice is a fallacy of moral relativism and creates more controversy in the process, more harm that must be remedied.
One of the most important qualities of a sovereign is the capacity to gain, use and clarify knowledge; the choice to seek the truth. In doing so they recognize the fundamental interconnectedness of all things, and that ultimately love, compassion and empathy are essential to settling disputes with other sovereign beings.
The following is essential material for the aspiring sovereign, one who knows where they are going, how they will get there and who will be affected in the process. For with great freedom comes great responsibility, requiring a wise and truth knowing mind so as to live harmoniously with others.
Other useful links:
Related The History of Voluntary Slavery: Birth (Settlement) Certificates

Related The Underworld Death Dealing Practices Of The Elite | Birth, Marriage and Death Estate Are Seized and Traded By The Government

Related Biometric Data Harvesting At Birth | Did You Know You Also Have a Uniform Birth Number?

Related Identity Theft and Birth Certificate Fraud Are Big Business For Corporate Government

– Justin - Source – Stop the Pirates
[The quoted text is from Judge Dale’s eBook The Great American Adventure, Secrets of America. See full text here.]

CESTUI QUE VIE Trust
The CESTUI QUE VIE Trust is an account you inherited due to the bankruptcy of the U.S. in 1933 and the subsequent ceasing of all the citizens’ gold, silver and other assets as collateral. This account contains millions of dollars in your name. The only problem is that the government and legal system failed to inform you about it and how to access your money. In the meantime, they are drawing down on it for their own personal use and as payment to the Vatican and the English crown.
Related Pope ‘Ruler of the World’ to go after War Criminals?

“It is the funds contained in this CESTUI QUE VIE that the Judge, Clerk and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the Elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those Investments.”
“Social Security; SSI; SSD; Medicare and Medicaid are all financed by the Trust. The government makes you pay TAXES and a portion of your wages supposedly to pay for these services, which they can borrow at any time for any reason since they cannot access the CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST to finance their Wars or to bail out Wall Street and their patron Corporations.”

“You may receive a monthly statement from a Mortgage Company, Loan Company or Utility Company, which usually has already been paid by the TRUST. Almost all of these corporate businesses double dip and hope that you have been conditioned well enough by their Credit Scams, to pay them a second time. Instead of paying that Statement next time, sign it approved and mail it back to them. If they then contact you about payment, ask them to send you a TRUE BILL instead of a Statement and you will be glad to pay it? A Statement documents what was due and paid, whereas a TRUE BILL represents only what is due. Banks and Utility Companies have direct access into these CESTUI QUE VIE Trusts and all they needed was your name; social security number and signature.”

[Here is a video discussing the trust relationships in a court room and some techniques for possibly gaining freedom from summary justice process. This involves asserting your standing as executor to the trust, using a Writ process. This is for research and informational purposes only. I do not advise using any process unless you have complete intrinsic knowledge of all factors involved. Even then, do so understanding in all likelihood the system will not act honorably.] Continue...

UNDERSTANDING CESTUI QUE VIE ACT 1666 – EXISTENCE OF LIFE
CEST TUI QUE TRUST

Reader Supported Truth and Education

Support Our Work

]]>