By Anna Von Reitz
This covers two very different topics --- one is a quick referral to all the Doubters out there about the potentially serious consequences of constant exposure to EM radiation. The other is a quick commentary on the Rod Class Case.
I like actual factual science and so I am always cruising around looking for it, and amid all the for-pay garbage, it is still quite easy to find on YouTube. Dr. Devra Davis does a bang 'em up job with her presentation made four years ago at the University of Melbourne in Australia, and nothing has changed in four years, except to get worse and more worrisome with the proliferation of 5G. Spend an hour and have all the information you need to shove under the noses of those who think that you are being a Luddite for viewing EM radiation as a potential threat to human health:
"The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation" -- Dr Devra Davis
And now on to Rod Class....
Brief background. Rod went to Washington, DC, with a couple of his duly registered guns in a lock box in his registered "motor vehicle" and he was arrested in Washington, DC, for violating their Municipal Code, which forbids bringing "firearms" into the capitol, which is an independent international city-state, authorized under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17. This clause of The Constitution of the United States (that is, the Municipal Constitution) tells us very clearly that this separate and foreign government is a "plenary oligarchy" run by the members of Congress. Period.
So, he basically identified himself as a Territorial U.S. Citizen via all his "registrations" which converted his guns into "firearms" and his private car into a "motor vehicle" belonging to the Territorial United States Government, and then he entered the foreign Municipality, which has been at "war" with the Territorial Government since 1861--- and he was amazed when he was arrested under Municipal Law for disturbing the peace.
How many of you have seen the Clint Eastwood film, "Unforgiven"?
Remember when the town passed the ordinance against bringing guns into town and the Sheriff was responsible for collecting and keeping everyone's guns while they were in town?
This is an apt demonstration of Local Law versus Constitutional guarantees.
The two things really don't have anything to do with each other if you are talking about independent sovereignty.
That little town had the sovereign right of self-government and self-determination, so if the people didn't want to put up with gunfighters whooping it up on Main Street, they had every right to require visitors to deposit their guns with the Sheriff or at some drop-off point outside the city limits. If you don't want to abide by the rule, Mister, keep riding.
The only responsibility the town had was to clearly post the requirement, which in the movie, they did by posting a big sign on the only road into and out of town. I don't know what Washington, DC, has done to provide Public Notice of its restrictions on guns, or whether Rod had prior knowledge of those restrictions.
What I do know is that Washington, DC, is an independent, international city-state, and the Municipal Congress has plenary authority to establish whatever laws they want to establish for the Municipality of Washington, DC. If they want to outlaw bubble gum, they can.
What I also know is that the Municipal Government has been at mostly tongue-in-cheek "war" with the Territorial United States Government since the 1860's, when the Territorial Government adopted the infamous 14th Amendment (or should I say, more properly, 14th By-Law) and declared all Municipal "citizens of the United States" to be criminals, and therefore, slaves, and began waging a campaign to collect war reparations from the Municipal citizenry.
Now you can see why the Municipal Police would be up in arms about a Territorial U.S. Citizen coming into Washington, DC, with firearms registered as part of the arsenal of the Territorial Government.
Heck, he might be there to take revenge for Bull Run.
Ridiculous as this is, this is the imaginary situation these folks are playing with, and here's Rod Class, Joe American, without a clue that this is going on, relying on his constitutional guarantees, totally unaware that he is entering foreign territory, unaware of the Municipal Law, unaware that he is himself not being recognized as an American State Citizen thanks to all the Territorial registrations attached to him, unaware that U.S. Citizens are "the Enemy" in a long-vanished war, unaware that his guns are classed as "firearms" and that he is engaged in transporting them across state lines (a city-state is a form of state), unaware that so far as the Municipal Police are concerned, he is a dangerous hombre and probably intent on shooting up Main Street.
So, then, Rod, still clueless as to what he is messing with, spends what? Five years messing around with the Municipal COURTS arguing about his constitutional rights (which so far as they are concerned, don't exist because he appears to be registered as a U.S. Citizen, and his car is registered and his guns are registered, too) and trying his best to get down to brass tacks and find out what kind of COURT this is? And under what law it operates?
He and over 2,000 court observers discover that the Municipal COURT is prosecuting him as an Enemy at war, under Title 50, 3 (23), and are determinedly throwing the book at him.
Well, why not?
Have I not told everyone within ear-shot of a foghorn and the FM grid that the only part of Federal Code ever adopted by the Municipal Government was Title 50?
Have I not told everyone that the exemption for American State Nationals and American State Citizens is at Section 7 (c) and (e) of the 2012 iteration of 50 USC? And have I not told everyone that you have to declare and record your political status as an American State National/State Citizen, otherwise, you are being mis-identified as a U.S. Citizen (by the Municipal Government) or as a Municipal "citizen of the United States" (by the Territorial Government)?
See how they set this cozy little "war" between themselves up, so that they could both prey upon us?
Anyway, so Rod and his Court Observers finally delve down to "discover" these facts and see for themselves that he is being ruthlessly prosecuted under the Common Law of War, which is basically no law at all, when in fact, as an American State National, he should be afforded The Law of Peace.
The problem is that he has not identified himself as an American and he has no admissible evidence established on the public record of his political status as an American, and he has not claimed The Law of Peace and he has not claimed his exemption, so of course, they are proceeding against him as the dirty, lily-livered Yankee sneak they "presume" he is..... intent on entering the Municipality and single-handedly ransacking it with a deer rifle....
It's easy for me to laugh, the whole prospect is so preposterous, but, nonetheless, that's what they are doing, and, moreover, that is what they have published that they are doing.
Rod and Company have gone so far as to deduce that they are being prosecuted under the Trading With the Enemy Act as Amended by the Emergency Banking Acts of 1933/34. And they have loudly proclaimed that "we" are being attacked as the Enemy under the War Powers Act, without taking into account who "we" are. Or who they are being mistaken for, either.
American State Nationals and American State Citizens are exempt from all this grim silliness, but until you declare your political status as an American, you are "presumed" to be some species of Federal "US" Citizen, still fighting the Civil War.
What adds an extra cherry on the top effect of all this, is that this "war" between Territorial United States Citizens and Municipal "citizens of the United States" is completely cynical and actually one-sided. The Territorial United States is ruled by Queen, acting as the Overseer of the Commonwealth for the Pope---- so the Pope, through the Queen, owns and operates the Territorial United States indirectly. And the Pope also charters the Municipal United States directly, so he owns and operates that, too.
So we have the spectacle of both sides being played against the unsuspecting "Middle" -- that's us, the clueless Third Parties --- by two sides that are both actually owned and operated by the Pope.
The Territorial Government purposefully misidentifies us and attacks us as Municipal citizens.
And the Municipal Government purposefully misidentifies us and attacks us as Territorial Citizens.
And they make out like bandits --- literal bandits--- promoting this fraud, simply because great men like Rod Class can't imagine that their history teachers left out "mission critical, need-to-know information".
So the Vermin threw their books at Rod Class, and he is looking at ten (10) years and $250,000.00 fine, plus all the court costs. The information he has brought forward and proven has been purchased at an unimaginably dear price, and could have been had for the cost of reading my blog articles. Now his worried friends are facing the prospect of a Supreme Court challenge, which will be useless and unlikely to be heard.
After all, the Municipal Government is a plenary oligarchy under the Constitutions, no matter which Constitution you read.
And I am his friend, and I am worried, too,--- that he will spend more of his life and his money and everything else, fighting this out to the bitter end (and it will be bitter, if he keeps going at it as he is). So, if I were Rod Class, here is what I would do:
I would investigate, in depth, the ways and means that the Municipality has used or failed to use to publicize its "no guns" policy. Mostly likely, they have not done a good job of that, and Rod would have basis to claim that he simply wasn't told that it was against the rules to bring a gun into Washington, DC.
Then, I would go to "my" state-of-state Congressional Delegation and lay out the facts, including the fact that I didn't actually cause any harm or brandish any firearms, and ask for "Congressional Clemency" and forgiveness for my unintentional and uninformed lapse.
They have the ability, as Oligarchs, to call up the judge in the case and say, "Hey, Jimmy, one of my Rubes, a guy named Rod Class, came in from the hinterlands and got arrested for having a deer rifle in a lock box in the back of his truck. Slap his hands and let him go with a warning, and oh, a $300 fine. That will be good enough."
And that's what will happen, because as Oligarchs, they have the power to do that within the Municipality of Washington, DC. No questions asked.
But beyond this bunch of flying factoids--- don't forget. It's the Pope and the Queen pulling the strings of this Punch and Judy Show, and though the members of the Territorial Congress may play Punch and the members of the Municipal Congress may play Judy, they are all just puppets in the hands of the Pope, who at the end of the day is the "Person" on Earth responsible for all this crime and mis-administration.
The Pope could turn to the Queen and say, "Hey, Lizzie, let's give it up and make amends. Stop the phony war against the Americans. Let them issue some kind of Peace Treaty ending the Civil War over there and play it straight from now on."
And the Queen would agree, because, after all, when it comes to administration of Commonwealth properties, she takes her orders from the Pope.
These facts and many more need to be brought to the Pope's attention and to the attention of the members of the United Nations Organizations and to the people of the Earth, so they get the message along with all the still-half-asleep and clueless Americans. Good people. Brave people. Stubborn people like Rod Class.
The American People don't deserve to be abused in any way, by any Pope or any British Queen. They both already owe us debts that can never be repaid, but as they stand accused before the entire world for this pitiless and ridiculous racketeering, they can pull in their horns and start trying.
See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Our life force will react to adjust on every stimulus or force that it is being exposed to within the body, mind, emotions or spirit. If the force of stimulus is stronger than the inner life force present, the bodies are forced to adjust in a way where a consequence of that force is perceived or experienced. If the force of stimulus is dissonant the consequence of that force can range from mildly unpleasant to excruciatingly painful. Depending on the inner spiritual core development, will be the relative reaction or response that the impact of these forces will have upon your body, mind, emotions or spirit. If the mind is weak, unfocused and undisciplined, these forces will pack a punch to your emotional body, weakening your life force. Nothing is more powerful than the development of your inner spiritual source and its life force energy. As this motivates one to develop their spiritual body through ego discipline, this increases inner energetic strength, which repels these external and extra-dimensional forces from knocking you around. This is what it means to have a strong spiritual and inner core.The impact of these forces upon your energetic body and how they resonate with the frequency of your being is called, the “Law of Resonance“.
Through the laws of physics, science confirms energy and matter interplay in massive EMF electro-dynamic fields that are measurable in terms of wave forms, frequency, wavelengths and amplitude. The same electromagnetic fields and substances that move throughout the Cosmos, move through our own bodies. Everything in the Cosmos vibrates at its own frequency, which makes it clear that every substance and body also vibrates at its own specific frequency. It is important to realize that every substance, body and being vibrates to its own frequency and that vibration will be amplified tremendously when stimulated by a similar or compatible resonant frequency. Resonating to the forces of “life”, forces of goodness, forces of gratitude, forces of love, will amplify these resonances and strengthen your body dramatically. Resonating through ego to the forces of fear, rage, frustration and resistance (to what “is”), will also amplify those disturbances in your body greatly.
The Science of the Law of Resonance
The lowest resonant frequency of any vibrating object ( which includes a human electromagnetic energy body) is called its fundamental frequency. Most vibrating objects have more than one resonant frequency as example, those used in musical instruments typically vibrate at harmonics of the fundamental frequency. A harmonic is defined as an whole number (integer) multiple that is a part of the lowest resonant frequency or fundamental frequency. As an example, vibrating strings, will vibrate at all harmonics that are a part of the fundamental frequency. The fundamental frequency is also called the first harmonic of the instrument or object. The fundamental frequency for most 3D human beings on the earth is the combined lowest frequency of the three energy centers that vibrate within the wave spectrum of the 1st Chakra (1D), 2nd Chakra (2D) and 3rd Chakra (3D). The variation of that fundamental frequency will be determined through which energy center that human being is primarily operating and resonant as the overall field of consciousness energy. (The overall field of consciousness energy would be the entire human energy field or the human aura.) A multidimensional human being, a person who has been exposed to higher energy centers ( such as through spiritual ascension) and been able to embody that quality of their higher vibration and frequency, may exist, therefore vibrate at a higher fundamental frequency. The human energy field and physical body acts similar to vibrating strings on an instrument which will resonate to an internal or external stimulus exactly like a Tuning Fork. The stimulus being introduced can be anything, a person, place or thing which carries a fundamental frequency and of which is a part of a composite field of energy. Everything has an energetic signature and all energy is intelligent and has a vibrating motion and quality of frequency. 
Tuning Fork Example of Resonance
In this demonstration of the Law of Resonance: One tuning fork (insert Person A) forces another tuning fork ( insert Person B) into vibrational motion at the same shared natural frequency. The two forks ( Person A and Person B) are connected by the surrounding air particles and interconnected into the quantum field of local energy space. As the quantum field (and air particles) surrounding the first fork (Person A) begin vibrating, the pressure waves that it creates begin to impinge at a periodic and regular rate (a sample frequency) of 256 Hz upon the second tuning fork (Person B). The energy carried by this sound wave through the quantum field is tuned into the frequency of the second tuning fork (Person B). Since the incoming sound waves from the first fork (Person A) share the same natural frequency as the second tuning fork, the tuning fork easily begins vibrating at its natural frequency. This is an example of resonance - when one object (Person A) is vibrating at the same natural frequency when introduced to a second object (person B) this stimulus forces that second object into vibrational motion that matches the shared fundamental frequency. The two objects vibrating at the same fundamental frequency will potentially amplify that frequency into greater harmonic resonance. The result of resonance is always a large vibration. Regardless of the vibrating system, if resonance occurs, a large vibration results. This is the same principle behind the energies that create the collective consciousness or the group field dynamics. The amount of group bodies resonating at the same fundamental frequency will determine the vibrational quality and amplification of the overall collective field of frequency. Each natural frequency that an body, object or instrument produces has its own characteristic vibrational mode or standing wave pattern. These unique standing wave patterns are only created within the body, object or instrument at specific frequencies of vibration; these frequencies are known as harmonic frequencies, or merely harmonics.Harmonic resonance is an extraordinarily varied phenomenon seen in countless forms throughout the universe within all bodies and objects. Harmonic resonance spans an vast range of spatial scales, from the tiniest quantum material, to wave-like vibrations of the particles of matter, to orbital resonances that emerge from the stars. All bodies (objects) tend to oscillate at some characteristic frequency, and at its higher harmonics, the frequencies escalate in order to that which are whole number (integer) multiples of its fundamental frequency.
In conclusion, resonance occurs when two or more interconnected objects share the same vibrational frequency. When one of the objects is vibrating, it forces the second object into vibrational motion. The result is a large vibration. And if a sound wave within the audible range of human hearing is produced, a loud sound is heard.
July 2012 Newsletter
Law of Vibration
See Also:Zero Point Field
Universal Tree of Life
Video Sample Resonance
An apparatus consisting of three sets of two inverted pendula is used to demonstrate the concept of resonance and forced vibration. Each pendulum in the set of two has the same length and as such the same vibrational frequency. When one of the pendulum is set into vibrational motion, it forces the other pendulum having the same length to vibrate with it. This is resonance.
Also See: Mind Slides
Also See: Strengthening Immunity
Wireless radiation has created an epidemic of disease! REGULATORS – AGAIN – ARE NOT PROTECTING THE PUBLIC!
Wireless radiation has created an epidemic of disease!
REGULATORS – AGAIN – ARE NOT PROTECTING THE PUBLIC!
As with Big Pharma and Big Agra, Big Wireless has captured our government.
Most Americans are unaware that in 1996 Congress passed legislation that exempted the wireless industry from liability for the harm this ever expanding industry causes all living things. When asking why the public is not being made aware of this pending catastrophe, just note the number of wireless commercials on TV everyday. No one in the media will expose the problem and risk losing massive amounts of advertising dollars.
This documentary is one of the most important ones you will ever watch!!
“InPower Episode 1: A Mass Action of Liability” is the follow-up to that film, released August 26. In this film, del Sol Beaulieu reveals how people are using commerce to leverage their power against politicians and corporations to ensure the right and ability to refuse smart meters.
As revealed in “Take Back Your Power,” many feel powerless in the face of government and large corporations that seem to dictate the rules without regard for an individual’s safety. But there are a wide variety of actions you can take to protect yourself and your family. This strategy, used in three communities in the United States and Canada, has already produced results indicative of a huge potential.
Smart Meters Linked to Chronic Health Problems
I’ve warned about the hazards of microwave radiation from cellphones, routers, portable phones, smart meters and other wireless technology for decades. Now, armed with the mechanism of harm presented by Martin Pall, Ph.D., in a series of papers1,2,3,4 I’m more convinced than ever that excessive exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are a significant health hazard that needs to be addressed — especially if you struggle with heart, brain or reproductive issues.
In a nutshell, nonionizing microwave exposures are a major source of mitochondrial dysfunction, and we’ve now come to appreciate that this is at the heart of virtually all chronic disease. It’s no wonder, really, that so many are reporting serious health problems after having a smart meter installed in their home.
What Pall discovered is that microwaves emitted from devices such as cellphones, Wi-Fi routers, computers and tablets — when not in airplane mode — increase intracellular calcium through voltage gated calcium channels (VGCCs), and the tissues with the highest density of VGCCs are your brain, the pacemaker in your heart and male testes.
Once these VGCCs are stimulated they trigger the release of neurotransmitters, neuroendocrine hormones and highly damaging reactive oxygen species (ROS) that significantly raise your risk for health problems such as anxiety, depression, Alzheimer’s, brain cancer, arrhythmias and infertility, just to name a few. Anyone struggling with any of these conditions would be wise to take EMF exposure very seriously, and take steps to limit exposure to wireless technology.
Simple measures include eliminating Wi-Fi in your home or at least turning it off at night. It is also helpful to keep your phone in airplane mode most of the time. This will radically increase your battery life and keep you safe.
My phone is in airplane mode nearly the entire day as I discovered that it provided high levels of radiation up to 30 feet away, even though it was not on a call — especially when the signal strength is only one or two “bars.” Obviously keep your phone in airplane mode when you are carrying it on your body. I actually take another step and put my phone in a Faraday bag.
When it comes to smart meters, many find they’re not given a choice in the matter. As shown in “Take Back Your Power,” utility company employees have literally broken into homes to forcibly install the meters. So, what can you do? That’s the focus of the InPower Movement, a new Indiegogo-funded project from Beaulieu and his team.
The Power of Liability
According to Beaulieu, social justice can be obtained by exercising the power within the body of rules and principles codified in modern commerce, which is a descendant of what’s known as “Law Merchant.” This can offer a highly effective lawful strategy to prevent and reverse the installation of a smart meter in your home and community.
It involves holding corporate executives and government agents financially accountable for their decisions. Cal Washington, co-founder of the InPower Movement, is an “empowerment advocate” who has spent several years fighting for justice for people who have been abused by corruption within the justice system.
Is it possible to hold corporate individuals accountable for their actions? Yes, it is, “and this has the potential to change everything,” del Sol Beaulieu notes, within his Episode 1. “The next 40 minutes is an overview of how this works.” Washington summarizes the Notice of Liability action he’s developed, which del Sol Beaulieu is sharing with the world through their film and website, as follows:
“It’s basically a counter-offer [to the] contract that is being implemented to put a device on everybody’s house. They’ve got us into a tacit agreement. This [Notice of Liability document] clarifies and expresses the counter-offer in such a way that those who don’t want the meter can say ‘I don’t want a meter,’ and if [the power company] does put a meter on the house it’s going to cost [them] X amount of dollars per day … in order for you to carry out this contract.”
In other words, you are currently in a contract with your power company. By changing your analog meter to a smart meter, they are changing the contract and you have to agree to this change in terms. However, codified in commerce there’s something known as tacit agreement — an agreement that is implied or understood without being directly expressed. Unless you object, you have tacitly agreed to this change in terms. As noted by Washington, “If you don’t say no, you’ve said yes.”
By understanding that the installation of smart meters is a commercial contract issued to you by your utility company, you level the playing field. All you’re doing is entering into a contract negotiation. “All the tricks they use against you, we use against them,” Washington says.
Notice of Liability
According to Washington, anyone can issue a Notice of Liability at any time, whether you still have an analog meter or have already received a smart meter and/or have tacitly agreed to the new meter. The “Notice of Liability” generally applies worldwide, as it is based on the system of commerce that governs corporate commerce everywhere. This is a system that virtually none of the general public is aware of, “and now you can actually use it,” Washington says. “You’re now playing the proper game in the proper court.”
Importantly, the Notice of Liability lays accountability at the feet of an individual. Corporate employees and agents can no longer hide behind their corporate post where they have no personal accountability. This includes government employees as well, because the U.S. government is actually run as and functions as a corporation. As noted in the film, the U.S. code defines the United States as a federal corporation, and Canada is listed as a company located in Washington D.C. on the U.S. securities and exchange.
Understanding Corporate Jurisdiction
In the film, Washington explains a key misunderstanding relating to jurisdiction. To explain the crux of the problem, he offers the following analogy: You’re hired as an employee in the auto department at Walmart. When hired, you agree to a basic contract that stipulates that you will work a certain number of hours for a certain pay. One day, your manager asks you to come in to work at 2 a.m. — a time when the store is closed.
While the auto department manager has jurisdiction over you, he’s under the jurisdiction of the store manager. Hence, you can file a complaint with the store manager, notifying her that what you’re being asked to do goes against company policy.
Walmart, in turn, has to obey the rules of the city in which it is located. In this example, the store is in Detroit, and must therefore follow employment rules and regulations of the city. Detroit, in turn, is under the jurisdiction of Michigan, and all businesses in Detroit must obey state laws. Next you have the United States, and this is what most people don’t know — the United States is functioning as a corporation UNDER the jurisdiction of The United States of America, the country. While they sound the same, they are not identical.
Courts operate under the corporation of the United States. In other words, according to Washington, the court system can be likened to a corporation within a corporation. Importantly, Americans believe they’re under the jurisdiction of the country called the United States of America, but in reality, you’re operating your day-to-day life under the jurisdiction of a corporation called the United States (or U.S.), and you’ve tacitly agreed to this, whether you realize it or not.
Lastly, the corporate United States is under the jurisdiction of Law Merchant, which governs commercial law, which in turn is under the jurisdiction of Common Law — which is where you find the Constitution of the United States of America (the republic). Both the United States of America and Canada were founded on the Common Law — the highest laws of the land — and still operate under their jurisdiction, “but you have to know how to invoke them,” Washington says.
There will no doubt be some who are resistant to what Washington and InPower are revealing. But I find it highly interesting that even before addressing the smart meter problem, he produces evidence of an extraordinary long list of people in high-level positions resigning from office, shortly after he sent them certain documentation.
Invocation of Personal Liability Is a Powerful Tool
The above example illustrates corporate jurisdiction. Even if a company allows their employees to work around the clock, they cannot force you to do so if it violates the laws of the city, state or the corporation of the U.S. In this case, the notice of liability action takes advantage of the fact that the corporation of the U.S. is under the jurisdiction of merchant and common law. Hence, by invoking these laws you supersede all others.
How does this make government officials personally liable, though? Government officials swear an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. Their oath is a contract. So, if they do not honor your constitutional rights, then they are not protected by their position within the corporation of the United States — they are personally liable because they’ve overstepped their role, just like the Walmart auto department manager did in the hypothetical illustration.
He did not have jurisdiction to tell you to clock in for work at 2 a.m., and a government official does not have the authority or jurisdiction to negate or violate the Constitution, merchant or common law. The only way they can practically get away with it is by your tacit agreement — you must actually waive your rights. The notice of liability that Washington created explicitly invokes your rights.
Phase 1 Results
Phase 1 of the InPower project involved three “seed” groups with a total of 200 participants who sent out liability notices. Similar to Washington’s previous experiences, a number of officials who received liability notices resigned from their posts. del Sol Beaulieu clarifies that, “while there’s no saying for certain what factors are involved in each resignation,” respondents are indeed resigning.
For example, on January 30, 2015, Brett Hodson, CEO of Corix Group, which installs smart meters, received more than 100 notices from residents in Kelowna, BC, Canada. On February 4, he received a separate Notice of Default from Washington. Hodson announced his resignation that same day.
Kelowna was one of the three seed groups. Groups in Seattle and Detroit also launched Notice of Liability actions. In Seattle, after receiving 21 Notices of Liability, three of the nine City Council members announced they would not seek reelection, including one who resigned before the end of her term.
“In Detroit, it is all-out war,” del Sol Beaulieu says. “The utility DTE has cut electricity to several homeowners who have refused smart meters.” However, after receiving 21 default notices (a later stage of the liability action), the Michigan attorney general suddenly began calling for free opt-out. Four of the eight officers in the Michigan Public Service Commission who are being held liable appear to have resigned — though it is yet unconfirmed by the utility.
Phase 2 Plan of Action and Summary
While del Sol Beaulieu states the focus of Phase 1 was to prove that the concept works, Phase 2 is a call to mass action across North America and Canada, with the goal of stopping the smart meter agenda completely and reversing back to safe, noninvasive technology. In summary, the Notice of Liability is part of a contractual negotiation process between you and your utility company. A contract has four basic components:
1. An offer. In this case, your utility may mail you a notice or post a notice on its website, telling you they are upgrading your meter. Unless you say no, you’re saying yes (tacit acceptance)
2. Negotiation/meeting of the minds. Whenever you present a contract to someone, they have the right and ability to negotiate the terms. (On a side note, to be valid, a contract must include full disclosure of relevant facts and terms, or else the contract is null and void. One could argue that since utility companies are not providing full disclosures about the potential health effects of the meters, they’ve voided the contract)
3. Unconditional acceptance. In this case, by sending out a notice of liability, you are issuing a counter-offer to their initial offer. You’re giving conditional acceptance, and to be valid, a contract must be unconditional. This means your conditions must either be met or removed.
As above, consent to conditions can be gained tacitly. This means if they do not reply to your notice of liability, and ratify the contract by installing the meter, they’ve accepted your terms — including the financial liability spelled out in your counter-offer.
For example, your notice may state that “If you put a meter on my house, I shall charge you $10,000 per week.” If they install a smart meter, or fail to remove the smart meter, your terms are deemed accepted, and the individual to whom you sent the notice is personally liable for this financial obligation. Within your legal rights are the use of liens, collection agencies and more.
They cannot fight you in court, because your notice restricts the jurisdiction — it’s part of the negotiation process of a personal agreement or contract between you and the individual. It’s no different than purchasing their house. Since they put the offer out, they cannot back out of the deal — your notice is part of the negotiation and these are your terms to their contract
4. Money exchange or performance ratifies the contract. “Performance” is the action of doing something based on the contract, which in this case is the installation or non-removal of the smart meter. By performing the act, the contract — entered into with your conditional acceptance — goes into effect and the individual is financially liable per your counter-offer
Join the InPower Movement
I am extremely excited about this project as it can serve as a template for not only removing smart meters, but wireless technology in schools. It is important to understand that children are at much higher risk of EMF damage. As noted in the InPower trailer,5 this strategy may also be used to stop deployment of 5G, forced vaccinations and other problems of “profits before people.”
On a call with del Sol Beaulieu and Washington last week, they explained to me how this process differs from others because it comprehensively lays the groundwork for the actual enforcement of the liability. “This isn’t the only possible solution,” del Sol Beaulieu said. “But we feel strongly about addressing the problem at its root, which is how money has corrupted social governance.”
“Those who get it, get it — and they will be enough,” Washington said. “There’s a certain percentage of people who have been waiting for this, and who can see through propaganda — for example from the utilities and lawyers, who will try to convince you that using commerce is bunk, even though it’s THEIR system.”
“This is about correcting the system which has become extremely out of balance. It’s to the point where the imbalance will threaten life as we know it, if allowed to continue. We can actually help to restore balance, and make big changes, when enough people catch onto this.”
To learn more and participate, go to InPowerMovement.com and sign up free. Once you’re signed up, you’ll receive Episode 2, which has step-by-step instructions on how to proceed, and additional support.
Shocking Admission Reveals How Smart Meters Are Used for Clandestine Surveillance
Last but not least, even if you do not believe smart meters have any ill health effects, I urge you to join the movement to eliminate them, if for no other reason than to block the global rollout of these clandestine surveillance devices. There can be little doubt that they are infringing on personal privacy, and indeed were designed with that in mind.
Rights advocate Jerry Day came across the following video, which del Sol Beaulieu calls “the most startling admission I have seen regarding in-home surveillance as the real focus of smart meters.” The video is a marketing video for Onzo, a large data aggregator that works with over 100 utilities globally. In this video, they explain what your power usage data is really used for:
“We then use this characterized profile to give the utility… the ability to monetize their customer data by providing a direct link to appropriate third-party organizations based on the customer’s identified character.”
In 2015, the director of grants and research at the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners also stated that, “I think the data [harvested by 'smart' meters] is going to be worth a lot more than the commodity that’s being consumed to generate the data.”6
Monthly Support Option
Unsubscribe at Anytime
One Time Tip
You Choose the Amount