Wireless radiation has created an epidemic of disease! REGULATORS – AGAIN – ARE NOT PROTECTING THE PUBLIC!
Wireless radiation has created an epidemic of disease!
REGULATORS – AGAIN – ARE NOT PROTECTING THE PUBLIC!
As with Big Pharma and Big Agra, Big Wireless has captured our government.
Most Americans are unaware that in 1996 Congress passed legislation that exempted the wireless industry from liability for the harm this ever expanding industry causes all living things. When asking why the public is not being made aware of this pending catastrophe, just note the number of wireless commercials on TV everyday. No one in the media will expose the problem and risk losing massive amounts of advertising dollars.
This documentary is one of the most important ones you will ever watch!!
May 31, 2018 by 1EarthUnited
Researchers have demonstrated how sonic and ultrasonic signals (inaudible to human) can be used to cause physical damage to hard drives just by playing ultrasonic sounds through a target computer’s own built-in speaker or by exploiting a speaker near the targeted device.
Similar research was conducted last year by a group of researchers from Princeton and Purdue University, who demonstrated a denial-of-service (DoS) attack against HDDs by exploiting a physical phenomenon called acoustic resonance.
Since HDDs are exposed to external vibrations, researchers showed how specially crafted acoustic signals could cause significant vibrations in HDDs internal components, which eventually leads to the failure in systems that relies on the HDD.
To prevent a head crash from acoustic resonance, modern HDDs use shock sensor-driven feed forward controllers that detect such movement and improve the head positioning accuracy while reading and writing the data.
However, according to a new research paper published by a team of researchers from the University of Michigan and Zhejiang University, sonic and ultrasonic sounds causes false positives in the shock sensor, causing a drive to unnecessarily park its head.
Patent to use Hypodermic Needles Injecting MicroTransponders into People - wireless neuro-stimulation, vagus nerve, neural plasticity
The company has a patent pending for a delivery system for implanting an array of neurotransponders next to a peripheral nerve by means of a hypodermic needle. The individual transponders can be linked together to form a cluster, and to make removal simpler. Each neurotransponder is the size of a grain of salt (about 1 mm in length and 0.25 mm in diameter), small enough for dozens to be implanted simultaneously in a single location.
How The Illuminati Create An Undetectable Total Mind Controlled ...www.amazon.com/Illuminati-Create-Undetectable-Total-Controlled/dp/1440490228
US Marshals Service reportedly fitting aircraft with ‘dirtboxes’ that interrogate phones on ground for identity and location. The US justice department is reportedly using electronic equipment on aircraft to simulate cellphone towers so it can collect phone location and identifying information on a mass scale from users on the ground below.
The allegations, reported in the Wall Street Journal late on Thursday, suggest that the US Marshals Service has for seven years flown Cessna aircraft outfitted with “dirtbox” devices that mimic cellular towers, permitting the collection of thousands of unique IDs and location data from users.
According to the Journal the planes operate from at least five metropolitan airports, permitting a “flying range covering most of the US population”.
The reportedly indiscriminate collection would permit the marshals and potentially other justice department agencies to avoid having to seek records from the phone companies themselves, especially in criminal investigations where a court order may be required.
The legal basis for the previously undisclosed program is unclear. It is not reportedly a national security or counterterrorism program, but instead used to target crime. The justice department is said to have modified the equipment so as not to interfere with 911 emergency calls.
The report comes nearly 18 months after the Guardian published revelations about National Security Agency bulk phone record collection based on leaks by Edward Snowden, prompting widespread congressional, judicial, political and popular scrutiny of domestic surveillance.
A justice department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, would not confirm or deny existence of the program to collect data using aircraft. But the official insisted the department’s activities were lawful and suggested it had received judicial approval. It is unclear if the congressional committees overseeing the collection of cellphone location and identification data have known about the effort.
“Discussion of sensitive law enforcement equipment and techniques would allow criminal defendants, criminal enterprises or foreign powers to determine our capabilities and limitations in this area. In deploying any such equipment or tactics our federal law enforcement agencies comply with federal law, including by seeking court approval,” the official said.
In official testimony US officials have routinely denied that the NSA collects phone location information in bulk, but they frequently add the caveat “under this program”, leading to widespread suspicion that other government programs perform that function, and prompting freedom of information requests seeking the truth.
A major surveillance bill, already passed by the House of Representatives, to get the NSA out of the business of much bulk domestic phone records collection is expected to receive a vote in the Senate in the coming days. Numerous court challenges to bulk domestic surveillance are also winding their way through federal courts.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation and intelligence agencies did not immediately respond to questions about the reported cellphone program. The White House declined comment and the justice department would not speak on the record.
Michael German, a former FBI agent now with New York University Law School, said: “The government’s attitude seems to be if it can, it should, without regard to the violation of Americans’ rights, so long as nobody knows. The overriding problem is the excessive secrecy that hides the government’s ever-expanding surveillance programs from public accountability.
“This isn’t about tipping off criminals. Every criminal or terrorist I ever worked undercover against knew they were criminals and terrorists, and therefore that there was probable cause to believe they were criminals and terrorists, so the government could get warrants to listen to their calls or search their homes.”
Christopher Soghoian, principle technologist at the American Civil Liberties Union, said: “This is bulk surveillance of a massive amount of people in order to find proverbial needle in a haystack
“Recently the FBI has impersonated members of the Associated Press, internet repairmen and now it’s impersonating the phone companies. This is just the latest example of them taking impersonation to the extreme.”
He called on Congress to open an investigation into this type of surveillance.
Soghoian said telecommunications companies were well aware of the type of technology used in the surveillance “but whether they knew it was being strapped to the bottom of planes is another story”.
Phone companies AT&T and Sprint declined to comment. Telecoms executives speaking on background said that all the major carriers used similar technology and they did not believe the fake towers were part of the cellphone companies’ own networks. Company executives are asking for clarification from the justice department.
The revelation is likely to drive a wedge between the mobile carriers and the justice department. The two have enjoyed a more cordial relationship than with the tech community in the aftermath of the Snowden revelations.
German, the ex-FBI agent, said: “This program is being kept secret so that the thousands of innocent Americans whose data is being collected improperly won’t complain.
“The affidavits for these court orders need to be unsealed, so we can see whether the problem is with the agencies that request these authorities or with the courts that fail to protect our privacy. Either way we need an accounting. We shouldn’t have to just trust that the government will handle the data it intercepts about our communications properly.”
By Scrivener |
December 2, 2009
• Regional Homeland Security- administered fusion centers use a nationwide microwave/laser electromagnetic radiation "directed energy" weapon system to silently torture, impair, subjugate unconstitutionally "targeted" Americans and their families -- an American genocide hiding in plain sight.
• Victims' own cell phones may be used to target them.
• How a young FBI agent's 'I believe you' gave victim the faith to go public.
GET POLITICAL w/ VIC LIVINGSTON
President Obama has told the nation and the world that America does not torture.
President Obama is wrong -- and security/military/intel officials in his administration know it. America tortures. Not just Gitmo and Bagram "war on terror" detainees, but its own citizens. Each day, a nationwide microwave/laser electromagnetic radiation directed energy weapon attack system employing "phased array" cell tower antenna transmitter/receivers and GPS satellites -- under the apparent command of dozens of U.S. Department of Homeland Security- administered "fusion centers" -- is used to silently and invisibly torture, impair, subjugate, and degrade the physical and neurological health of thousands of unjustly, unconstitutionally "targeted" American citizens...
...and most of the victims have no idea what is making them sick, tired, exhausted, irritable, confused, lethargic; plagued with painful, debilitating head and body aches, sharp, piercing, painful ringing tones audible only to the target, temporary or permanent cognitive impairment...
...leaving them unable to function normally and lead a happy, healthy life.
Victims of this government-engineered, stealth genocide are robbed of the most basic of human rights -- free will, freedom from external manipulation of their physiological and mental functions.
Medical experts have confirmed that irradiation with microwaves and other radio frequencies can induce injury, illness and disease, from strokes and aneurysms to cataracts and cancer -- and death.
The military aptly applies the descriptor "slow kill" to these weapons systems, capable of targeting and delivering a wide array of electromagnetic microwave and other radio frequencies with extreme precision -- not "faster than a speeding bullet," in the parlance of "Superman," but at the speed of LIGHT. According to publicly available patents upon which the system is based...
http://freepatentsonline.com/7629918.html, http://freepatentsonline.com/4456912.html.... this "multi-functional radio frequency directed energy weapon system" generates precision "directed" bursts of pulsed microwave energy using the combined power of multiplexed, phased array antenna installations that generate "scalar" electromagnetic waves. Scalar waves are "out-of-phase" radio waves that have the unique ability to extract variable amounts of microwave energy from a vacuum state. The technology has its roots in the pioneering work of the scientist Nikola Tesla, whose "Tesla coil" invention first demonstrated the awesome energy-producing properties of scalar waves.http://www.teslasociety.com Some scientists believe that scalar wave technology, if exploited for peaceful purposes, could provide a cheap and efficient solution to the world's energy demands. But the companies that hold the patents appear to be withholding the technology exclusively for military and national security applications.The scalar waves produced by the microwave/laser radio frequency directed energy weapon (RFDE) are capable of carrying multiple "subcarrier" radio frequencies that affect human physiology, at variable power levels (or "amplitude"). In effect, the RFDE arms security forces with a "God machine" that can manipulate, disrupt, or destroy the biological processes that govern the functioning of human beings. The God machine can do even more than allow its military and security state operators to lord over the world's population. The Raytheon patent states that this weapon system can be used to alter, or eliminate, "undesirable atmospheric conditions." In other words, these cell tower installations can manipulate and control the weather -- harnessing the world's climate, turning the weather into a potential military super-weapon. The old adage, "You can't change the weather," no longer is true. The covert installation of RFDE antennae everywhere across America explains the profusion of cell towers, and why so many towers are clustered so close together, from urban neighborhoods to expansive rural plains and farmlands.
The cover story -- that these are just cell phone towers -- amounts to nothing less than a big government lie. Yet the system is inextricably and ominously linked to consumer cellular communications.
It appears that a human target's own cell phone may serve as a covert targeting device for this attack system. Those who are marked for electromagnetic attack could be paying for a telecommunications service that enables their silent torture, impairment and potential injury.
(For more on targeting technologies, see the footnote at the bottom of this article.)
This cell tower attack network has been deployed under the cover of "national security," apparently as a means to instantly and covertly disable electronic devices that could be used as weapons by terrorists or hostile forces. The technology requires a continuous stream of microwave and laser radiation -- meaning that the entire population of the United States, as well as other nations, is now being bathed in microwave emissions every minute of every hour of every day.
Because the system has been built out only in recent years, no entity has studied the long-term health effects of having a stealth cell tower weapon system clustered in populated areas.
Victims of this attack system maintain that silent assaults directed at a targeted individual can cause "induced dementia" -- symptoms that mimic Alzheimer's disease and other cognitive dysfunction, but which can dissipate when and if the attacks cease -- or if the "amplitude" of the microwave frequency is turned down by its clandestine government operatives. "The idea is to make the 'target' look mentally ill or emotionally unstable, so that the person can be shunted into a mental hospital or otherwise marginalized and removed from society," says one alleged victim, who says that the silent attacks rendered him so weak, disoriented, and fatigued that he was unable to work for a period of four years. This victim says he slowly regained his full cognitive abilities only after repeated visits to a local FBI office, where he pleaded with agents to intervene on his behalf. But he reports that the attacks have continued, causing both fatigue and sharp momentary pain that he says amounts to torture. He also maintains that his local police chief is aware of the covert attack system, but appears to be powerless to stop the attacks. "What kept me going when the attacks were most severe, from the summer of 2004 and into 2008, was when I went down to the FBI and literally begged a young FBI agent to help me, and she looked me directly in the eye and said, 'I believe you.' "When she said that, it gave me the confidence to go public despite my fears that I'd be treated like some kind of a nut case. Now that the truth is getting out, I'm grateful to that young agent for giving me the faith to fight this."
Editor's note: Now, do you think that this is just an opinion as it states at the top of this story?
By the pervasive deployment of these weapons systems as a tool of torture and enslavement, the U.S. government is denying thousands of its citizens the inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The U.S. government has enabled the "slow kill," torture, or impairment of thousands of its own people while cruelly stripping them of free will -- the very essence of what it is to be human.
This classified weapons system functions in every community in America. Some local police officials know about it. Apparently, they have been sworn to secrecy on "national security" grounds. The mainstream media has its collective head in the sand, buying the government propaganda that a new generation of directed energy weapons is "less lethal" and thus "saves lives." That is another big lie. This covert torture matrix is every bit as heinous as the death machine of Nazi Germany -- perhaps even more so, because it is silent and invisible.
Victims of these silent assaults also are subject to relentless "community stalking" harassment, vandalism, and terroristic acts performed by government-enabled "community watch" and policing organizations that have been transmogrified by a secret multi-agency federal program into a vigilante American Gestapo.
Victims also say they are subject to financial and career sabotage enabled by government agencies that have deemed them to be "dissidents" or undesirables -- or have slandered them as suspected criminals or "enemies of the state."
President Obama: Wake up. You and other top officials also may be in the cross-hairs -- and this stealth technology, when applied using Pavlovian methodology, can even be used to covertly influence behavior and decision-making -- maybe even your own.
Editor's note: By now, I hope that everyone realizes that Obama was put into power by Rothschild who is a Satanist. See http://www.truedemocracy.net/td-30/9.html or http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/bloodlines/rothschild.htm Texe Marrs stated the Obama Rothschild connection, and if you look at the cover of the 35th edition (<http://www.truedemocracy.net/index.html>) you should agree, especially if you scroll down on that cover.
"These are crimes against humanity and the Constitution, being perpetrated under the cover of national security and 'safe streets' by multiple federal and local agencies and commands -- an American genocide hiding in plain sight, enabled by the naivete of those who think 'it can't happen here.'" -- Victor Livingston, former reporter for WTXF-TV Philadelphia, Philadelphia Bulletin, N.Y. Daily News, St. Petersburg Times; producer/host, MSG Network Sports Business Report; columnist, NowPublic.com/scrivener.
FOOTNOTE: TARGETING SYSTEMS This cell tower- based microwave attack system apparently uses various advanced technologies to target human beings. According to information obtained from unclassified patents, defense industry trade journals, as well as an analysis of victim accounts, it appears that a three-dimensional, invisible infrared laser targeting sensor array secreted in or near the victim's home or place of business makes possible precision-placed electromagnetic frequency attacks, prolonged or sudden and momentary, to specific body parts -- internal or external. The literature states that laser targeting systems can be trained on vehicles or moving targets, facilitating precision attacks even if the target is traveling at extremely high rates of speed. http://www.defensereview.com/lucid-dimensions-spherical-detection-systems-sds-3d-passive-infrared-ir-spherical-sensor-array-detects-and-tracks-high-speed-ballistic-threats-aircraft-vehicles-you-name-it/If such a sophisticated targeting device is not available, it appears the microwave attack system is capable of acquiring targeting coordinates from the intended victim's cell phone or GPS unit. In that case, the targeting is believed to be less precise, but still able to produce disorienting and painful attacks, such as prolonged and unremitting headache and induced weakness and fatigue. Some victims of this stealth technology now use their cell phones and GPS units only when absolutely necessary, and remove the cell phone's battery to prevent the broadcast of their location coordinates. (Just turning off the unit does not suffice, since a cell phone's power can be turned on by remote control.) If neither a 3D infrared laser targeting device nor a "live" cell phone is available, the system still appears capable of delivering painful, disorienting or even disabling frequencies. It is believed that the government has equipped certain personnel -- either its own agents, or, some victims believe, local law enforcement or civilian vigilantes -- with portable laser-equipped devices that can "paint the target" from a distance. It is possible that some sworn officers may be under the impression that this technology is used merely for "through the wall surveillance," not to attack citizens they are sworn to protect. The literature also indicates that the microwave weapon system can engage the target by way of tiny RFID tags covertly placed in or on the target's possessions or clothing. These film-thin RFID tags are ubiquitous in everyday commerce, used for inventory tracking of many consumer products. "GPS-linked" video surveillance systems, in public areas or inside commercial establishments, also could be used to transmit targeting coordinates to government command centers.
High-powered military satellites are believed to be capable of detecting ground-based tracking devices from low Earth orbit.
The article linked below, from the web site of the conservative Heritage Foundation, describes a directed energy weapon system that sounds much like the cell tower- based system described here. The article discusses a microwave/laser weapon system capable of both tracking and engaging a speeding target at the speed of light
The Heritage Foundation article describes directed energy weapon systems as "under development," despite the fact that the cell tower- based system is fully operational. Also, sentences referencing the effectiveness of directed energy systems against "human targets" such as "terrorists" apparently have been expunged in recent weeks -- after this author quoted the article in the "comments" section of this web site.
JOURNO TO FBI: TAKE CONTROL OF DHS-RUN FUSION CENTERS TO STOP SILENT MICROWAVE / LASER ATTACKS ON U.S. CITIZENS
OR (if links are corrupted / disabled): http://www.NowPublic.com/scrivener RE: "GESTAPO USA"
INDEPENDENT JOURNALIST VIC LIVINGSTON SEEKS UNDERWRITER
The author of these articles is seeking a foundation dedicated to human rights to underwrite his work, which, since the inception of these pages in July 2008, has been strictly pro bono. The underwriter's financial support would be publicly credited at the top and the bottom of each story. Those seriously interested in this opportunity to support what I believe is vital and unique journalism, please attempt to contact me via email with contact information (firstname.lastname@example.org). My email has been subject to interception and tampering; so if I do not respond in a timely matter it surely means I did not receive the message. In that event, please leave word in the "comments" section of one of my articles and I will endeavor to reach you by other means -- preferably, in person. I reside within commuting distance of Manhattan.
Attorney Gerald W. Dibble has been selected each year from 2010 to 2016 (inclusive) by Super Lawyers (a rating service of outstanding lawyers who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement).
His law firm, Dibble & Miller, P.C. (dibblelaw.com), is located in Rochester, NY., and employs 40 staff members including 11 attorneys. The attorneys and the highly trained staff reviews the evidence provided to the firm by a person (sometimes referred to as a "targeted individual"), who asserts that they are the victim of electronic-involuntary-objectionable intrusions (sometimes referred to as "targeted assaults"), in order to determine if such intrusions are subject to verification sufficient to submit to a court of law as legally-acceptable proof of such intrusions. In doing so, the firm retains the services of an electrical engineer to review the evidence and to determine if the evidence was obtained by scientific methodology sufficient to verify the validity of the evidence for use in a court of law. And this is done in order to establish that the person submitting the evidence involuntarily suffers from such intrusions.
If such involuntary-objectionable-electronic intrusions are sufficiently established, then the evidence is assembled, organized and analyzed and presented in a format sufficient to submit to a court of law as acceptable evidence of such involuntary-objectionable-electronic intrusions. Additionally, depending on the jurisdiction in which such intrusions were taking place, the firm will prepare a draft complaint to be submitted to an attorney in the proper jurisdiction for filing in a court of law to seek a restraining order to stop the intrusions and to seek demonstrable damages. Alternatively, if the evidence is not sufficient to establish such intrusions, the firm will provide the reasons for such insufficiency, and, if possible, will provide a method to obtain such evidence.
As a once long term licensed amateur radio operator, Attorney Gerald Dibble himself has knowledge of the technology that could be used to create such electronic intrusions.
All data and information provided on this recording is for informational purposes only. The host, Ella Free makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this recording and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis.
“InPower Episode 1: A Mass Action of Liability” is the follow-up to that film, released August 26. In this film, del Sol Beaulieu reveals how people are using commerce to leverage their power against politicians and corporations to ensure the right and ability to refuse smart meters.
As revealed in “Take Back Your Power,” many feel powerless in the face of government and large corporations that seem to dictate the rules without regard for an individual’s safety. But there are a wide variety of actions you can take to protect yourself and your family. This strategy, used in three communities in the United States and Canada, has already produced results indicative of a huge potential.
Smart Meters Linked to Chronic Health Problems
I’ve warned about the hazards of microwave radiation from cellphones, routers, portable phones, smart meters and other wireless technology for decades. Now, armed with the mechanism of harm presented by Martin Pall, Ph.D., in a series of papers1,2,3,4 I’m more convinced than ever that excessive exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are a significant health hazard that needs to be addressed — especially if you struggle with heart, brain or reproductive issues.
In a nutshell, nonionizing microwave exposures are a major source of mitochondrial dysfunction, and we’ve now come to appreciate that this is at the heart of virtually all chronic disease. It’s no wonder, really, that so many are reporting serious health problems after having a smart meter installed in their home.
What Pall discovered is that microwaves emitted from devices such as cellphones, Wi-Fi routers, computers and tablets — when not in airplane mode — increase intracellular calcium through voltage gated calcium channels (VGCCs), and the tissues with the highest density of VGCCs are your brain, the pacemaker in your heart and male testes.
Once these VGCCs are stimulated they trigger the release of neurotransmitters, neuroendocrine hormones and highly damaging reactive oxygen species (ROS) that significantly raise your risk for health problems such as anxiety, depression, Alzheimer’s, brain cancer, arrhythmias and infertility, just to name a few. Anyone struggling with any of these conditions would be wise to take EMF exposure very seriously, and take steps to limit exposure to wireless technology.
Simple measures include eliminating Wi-Fi in your home or at least turning it off at night. It is also helpful to keep your phone in airplane mode most of the time. This will radically increase your battery life and keep you safe.
My phone is in airplane mode nearly the entire day as I discovered that it provided high levels of radiation up to 30 feet away, even though it was not on a call — especially when the signal strength is only one or two “bars.” Obviously keep your phone in airplane mode when you are carrying it on your body. I actually take another step and put my phone in a Faraday bag.
When it comes to smart meters, many find they’re not given a choice in the matter. As shown in “Take Back Your Power,” utility company employees have literally broken into homes to forcibly install the meters. So, what can you do? That’s the focus of the InPower Movement, a new Indiegogo-funded project from Beaulieu and his team.
The Power of Liability
According to Beaulieu, social justice can be obtained by exercising the power within the body of rules and principles codified in modern commerce, which is a descendant of what’s known as “Law Merchant.” This can offer a highly effective lawful strategy to prevent and reverse the installation of a smart meter in your home and community.
It involves holding corporate executives and government agents financially accountable for their decisions. Cal Washington, co-founder of the InPower Movement, is an “empowerment advocate” who has spent several years fighting for justice for people who have been abused by corruption within the justice system.
Is it possible to hold corporate individuals accountable for their actions? Yes, it is, “and this has the potential to change everything,” del Sol Beaulieu notes, within his Episode 1. “The next 40 minutes is an overview of how this works.” Washington summarizes the Notice of Liability action he’s developed, which del Sol Beaulieu is sharing with the world through their film and website, as follows:
“It’s basically a counter-offer [to the] contract that is being implemented to put a device on everybody’s house. They’ve got us into a tacit agreement. This [Notice of Liability document] clarifies and expresses the counter-offer in such a way that those who don’t want the meter can say ‘I don’t want a meter,’ and if [the power company] does put a meter on the house it’s going to cost [them] X amount of dollars per day … in order for you to carry out this contract.”
In other words, you are currently in a contract with your power company. By changing your analog meter to a smart meter, they are changing the contract and you have to agree to this change in terms. However, codified in commerce there’s something known as tacit agreement — an agreement that is implied or understood without being directly expressed. Unless you object, you have tacitly agreed to this change in terms. As noted by Washington, “If you don’t say no, you’ve said yes.”
By understanding that the installation of smart meters is a commercial contract issued to you by your utility company, you level the playing field. All you’re doing is entering into a contract negotiation. “All the tricks they use against you, we use against them,” Washington says.
Notice of Liability
According to Washington, anyone can issue a Notice of Liability at any time, whether you still have an analog meter or have already received a smart meter and/or have tacitly agreed to the new meter. The “Notice of Liability” generally applies worldwide, as it is based on the system of commerce that governs corporate commerce everywhere. This is a system that virtually none of the general public is aware of, “and now you can actually use it,” Washington says. “You’re now playing the proper game in the proper court.”
Importantly, the Notice of Liability lays accountability at the feet of an individual. Corporate employees and agents can no longer hide behind their corporate post where they have no personal accountability. This includes government employees as well, because the U.S. government is actually run as and functions as a corporation. As noted in the film, the U.S. code defines the United States as a federal corporation, and Canada is listed as a company located in Washington D.C. on the U.S. securities and exchange.
Understanding Corporate Jurisdiction
In the film, Washington explains a key misunderstanding relating to jurisdiction. To explain the crux of the problem, he offers the following analogy: You’re hired as an employee in the auto department at Walmart. When hired, you agree to a basic contract that stipulates that you will work a certain number of hours for a certain pay. One day, your manager asks you to come in to work at 2 a.m. — a time when the store is closed.
While the auto department manager has jurisdiction over you, he’s under the jurisdiction of the store manager. Hence, you can file a complaint with the store manager, notifying her that what you’re being asked to do goes against company policy.
Walmart, in turn, has to obey the rules of the city in which it is located. In this example, the store is in Detroit, and must therefore follow employment rules and regulations of the city. Detroit, in turn, is under the jurisdiction of Michigan, and all businesses in Detroit must obey state laws. Next you have the United States, and this is what most people don’t know — the United States is functioning as a corporation UNDER the jurisdiction of The United States of America, the country. While they sound the same, they are not identical.
Courts operate under the corporation of the United States. In other words, according to Washington, the court system can be likened to a corporation within a corporation. Importantly, Americans believe they’re under the jurisdiction of the country called the United States of America, but in reality, you’re operating your day-to-day life under the jurisdiction of a corporation called the United States (or U.S.), and you’ve tacitly agreed to this, whether you realize it or not.
Lastly, the corporate United States is under the jurisdiction of Law Merchant, which governs commercial law, which in turn is under the jurisdiction of Common Law — which is where you find the Constitution of the United States of America (the republic). Both the United States of America and Canada were founded on the Common Law — the highest laws of the land — and still operate under their jurisdiction, “but you have to know how to invoke them,” Washington says.
There will no doubt be some who are resistant to what Washington and InPower are revealing. But I find it highly interesting that even before addressing the smart meter problem, he produces evidence of an extraordinary long list of people in high-level positions resigning from office, shortly after he sent them certain documentation.
Invocation of Personal Liability Is a Powerful Tool
The above example illustrates corporate jurisdiction. Even if a company allows their employees to work around the clock, they cannot force you to do so if it violates the laws of the city, state or the corporation of the U.S. In this case, the notice of liability action takes advantage of the fact that the corporation of the U.S. is under the jurisdiction of merchant and common law. Hence, by invoking these laws you supersede all others.
How does this make government officials personally liable, though? Government officials swear an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. Their oath is a contract. So, if they do not honor your constitutional rights, then they are not protected by their position within the corporation of the United States — they are personally liable because they’ve overstepped their role, just like the Walmart auto department manager did in the hypothetical illustration.
He did not have jurisdiction to tell you to clock in for work at 2 a.m., and a government official does not have the authority or jurisdiction to negate or violate the Constitution, merchant or common law. The only way they can practically get away with it is by your tacit agreement — you must actually waive your rights. The notice of liability that Washington created explicitly invokes your rights.
Phase 1 Results
Phase 1 of the InPower project involved three “seed” groups with a total of 200 participants who sent out liability notices. Similar to Washington’s previous experiences, a number of officials who received liability notices resigned from their posts. del Sol Beaulieu clarifies that, “while there’s no saying for certain what factors are involved in each resignation,” respondents are indeed resigning.
For example, on January 30, 2015, Brett Hodson, CEO of Corix Group, which installs smart meters, received more than 100 notices from residents in Kelowna, BC, Canada. On February 4, he received a separate Notice of Default from Washington. Hodson announced his resignation that same day.
Kelowna was one of the three seed groups. Groups in Seattle and Detroit also launched Notice of Liability actions. In Seattle, after receiving 21 Notices of Liability, three of the nine City Council members announced they would not seek reelection, including one who resigned before the end of her term.
“In Detroit, it is all-out war,” del Sol Beaulieu says. “The utility DTE has cut electricity to several homeowners who have refused smart meters.” However, after receiving 21 default notices (a later stage of the liability action), the Michigan attorney general suddenly began calling for free opt-out. Four of the eight officers in the Michigan Public Service Commission who are being held liable appear to have resigned — though it is yet unconfirmed by the utility.
Phase 2 Plan of Action and Summary
While del Sol Beaulieu states the focus of Phase 1 was to prove that the concept works, Phase 2 is a call to mass action across North America and Canada, with the goal of stopping the smart meter agenda completely and reversing back to safe, noninvasive technology. In summary, the Notice of Liability is part of a contractual negotiation process between you and your utility company. A contract has four basic components:
1. An offer. In this case, your utility may mail you a notice or post a notice on its website, telling you they are upgrading your meter. Unless you say no, you’re saying yes (tacit acceptance)
2. Negotiation/meeting of the minds. Whenever you present a contract to someone, they have the right and ability to negotiate the terms. (On a side note, to be valid, a contract must include full disclosure of relevant facts and terms, or else the contract is null and void. One could argue that since utility companies are not providing full disclosures about the potential health effects of the meters, they’ve voided the contract)
3. Unconditional acceptance. In this case, by sending out a notice of liability, you are issuing a counter-offer to their initial offer. You’re giving conditional acceptance, and to be valid, a contract must be unconditional. This means your conditions must either be met or removed.
As above, consent to conditions can be gained tacitly. This means if they do not reply to your notice of liability, and ratify the contract by installing the meter, they’ve accepted your terms — including the financial liability spelled out in your counter-offer.
For example, your notice may state that “If you put a meter on my house, I shall charge you $10,000 per week.” If they install a smart meter, or fail to remove the smart meter, your terms are deemed accepted, and the individual to whom you sent the notice is personally liable for this financial obligation. Within your legal rights are the use of liens, collection agencies and more.
They cannot fight you in court, because your notice restricts the jurisdiction — it’s part of the negotiation process of a personal agreement or contract between you and the individual. It’s no different than purchasing their house. Since they put the offer out, they cannot back out of the deal — your notice is part of the negotiation and these are your terms to their contract
4. Money exchange or performance ratifies the contract. “Performance” is the action of doing something based on the contract, which in this case is the installation or non-removal of the smart meter. By performing the act, the contract — entered into with your conditional acceptance — goes into effect and the individual is financially liable per your counter-offer
Join the InPower Movement
I am extremely excited about this project as it can serve as a template for not only removing smart meters, but wireless technology in schools. It is important to understand that children are at much higher risk of EMF damage. As noted in the InPower trailer,5 this strategy may also be used to stop deployment of 5G, forced vaccinations and other problems of “profits before people.”
On a call with del Sol Beaulieu and Washington last week, they explained to me how this process differs from others because it comprehensively lays the groundwork for the actual enforcement of the liability. “This isn’t the only possible solution,” del Sol Beaulieu said. “But we feel strongly about addressing the problem at its root, which is how money has corrupted social governance.”
“Those who get it, get it — and they will be enough,” Washington said. “There’s a certain percentage of people who have been waiting for this, and who can see through propaganda — for example from the utilities and lawyers, who will try to convince you that using commerce is bunk, even though it’s THEIR system.”
“This is about correcting the system which has become extremely out of balance. It’s to the point where the imbalance will threaten life as we know it, if allowed to continue. We can actually help to restore balance, and make big changes, when enough people catch onto this.”
To learn more and participate, go to InPowerMovement.com and sign up free. Once you’re signed up, you’ll receive Episode 2, which has step-by-step instructions on how to proceed, and additional support.
Shocking Admission Reveals How Smart Meters Are Used for Clandestine Surveillance
Last but not least, even if you do not believe smart meters have any ill health effects, I urge you to join the movement to eliminate them, if for no other reason than to block the global rollout of these clandestine surveillance devices. There can be little doubt that they are infringing on personal privacy, and indeed were designed with that in mind.
Rights advocate Jerry Day came across the following video, which del Sol Beaulieu calls “the most startling admission I have seen regarding in-home surveillance as the real focus of smart meters.” The video is a marketing video for Onzo, a large data aggregator that works with over 100 utilities globally. In this video, they explain what your power usage data is really used for:
“We then use this characterized profile to give the utility… the ability to monetize their customer data by providing a direct link to appropriate third-party organizations based on the customer’s identified character.”
In 2015, the director of grants and research at the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners also stated that, “I think the data [harvested by 'smart' meters] is going to be worth a lot more than the commodity that’s being consumed to generate the data.”6
Connecting The Dots
One Time Donation