When you applied for a “marriage license” a private, for-profit franchise of the UNITED NATIONS doing business as the STATE OF____________ claimed a custodial ownership interest in your marital relationship and the products resulting from it. On the basis of your own signature, this entity secretively claimed to own you, your wife, and your children as chattel. According to them, when you apply for a marriage license, the nature of the marriage contract changes and becomes a "civil contract".

1 "Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties - the husband, the
2 wife and the state." Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.
3 Did you ever intend to give a foreign privately owned corporation merely calling
4 itself the STATE OF_____________permission to distribute your assets in a
5 divorce, force you to pay alimony and child support, and to seize custody of your
6 minor children under armed force?
7 Were these results of signing a “marriage license” ever disclosed to you by the
8 STATE? Did the STATE disclose its identity and nature, as a franchise of a
9 foreign, for-profit, privately owned corporation?
10 You were never required to have a marriage license to be lawfully married----but
11 was that fact ever fully disclosed to you by the STATE?
12 You have the absolute right to rescind your signature from any contract that
13 was not fully disclosed to you. Such a contract is null and void, as if it never
14 existed at all, and all payments and other asset distributions exercised under it are
15 subject to return to the lawful owner(s), plus reasonable interest.
16 You are not obligated by any contract obtained under conditions of fraud,
17 deceit, or non-disclosure. The STATE is culpable for its failure to disclose.
18 Any demand that you produce a “marriage license” as a prerequisite to access
19 services and benefits to which you are otherwise entitled---such as medical
20 insurance coverage for your spouse --- are illegal monopoly inducements.
21 This is just the tip of the iceberg.
Continue...

​