Understanding the reality of our government is essential for everyone to "realize, know, and understand". At the moment the American people do not have a legitimate government. As Rep Traficant said in 1993, it is "de facto".
Judge Anna von Reitz
Chances are you aren’t obligated to be considered any form of federal Municipal CITIZEN nor as a federal Territorial Citizen, but you have been entrapped in a profit-making scheme that pretends that you have knowingly and willingly agreed to act as a volunteer federal employee— specifically, as a “Withholding Agent” — a Warrant Officer in the Merchant Marine Service, and that you have purposefully and knowingly enrolled in the Social Security program which is only available to federal employees in order to receive benefits from the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) which was organized in the wake of the Civil War for welfare relief of former plantation slaves.
What? You never worked a day for the federal government? You were never told that “Social Security” is only for federal employees and dependents? You aren’t a former plantation slave? You never got any benefits?
Well, then, you have to stop calling yourself any kind of “US citizen” — because citizens all work for the government. They have a duty and obligation to obey every statute, code, and whim of the government as a result, and they are also liable to pay federal income taxes. You also have to stop voting in any “US elections” including “State of State” elections, because the States of States are just local franchises of the federal corporation(s) defined at 28 USC 3002 (15).
So, Step One— withdraw and rescind any and all applications and enrollments as a “registered voter”. You have no natural interest in the elections of a foreign corporation that you don’t work for, right?
If you don’t get a paycheck direct from the federal government and you don’t want to function as a for-free Withholding Agent and aren’t interested in any “benefits” that you pay for yourself and don’t want to be held subject to the whims of a foreign entity that is supposed to be providing you with Good Faith Service instead– then read on.
You have been mis-characterized and defrauded and you have prima facie evidence of that readily available. You think of it as your Birth Certificate, but it isn’t. It is a “certification” that a federal MUNICIPAL “PERSON” was created and named after you and that at one point in your life you were a real American. You were born on your birthday, but the MUNICIPAL PERSON has a birth date which is several days or weeks later—the filing date shown on the certificate.
Please note that the “Birth Certificate” is printed on bond paper. It is a security instrument. Please also note that it has been signed by the Registrar — an officer of the probate court. This is prima facie evidence that your earthly estate was probated when you were only a few days or weeks old and that it was seized upon by the State of ___________ or STATE OF_________ and operated for its benefit from that time on.
So, Step Two—- ditch the federal MUNICIPAL PERSON and the responsibilities and obligations associated with it.
You need to get the Birth Certificate authenticated if that is still possible in your state, or certified, if not, and then you need to endorse it and “surrender” it to the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury.
(Please note the two dots between the “U” and the “S”—– the U.S. Treasury.) and make Steven T. Mnuchin the Fiduciary responsible for IT.
The endorsement is simple but exact. The authenticated or certified Birth Certificate that the birth State Secretary of State sends back to you will have a cover page riveted or hard stapled and firmly attached to the front of the BC. You leave that cover page attached and on the front of the BC itself in the upper left hand corner and in red ink you write: “Accepted by Drawee” and sign it by: Your Upper Lower Case Signature, and date it.
Then turn the BC over and on the back anywhere write: Pay to the Order of the United States of America, U.S. Treasury. Without Recourse. And again, write— by: Your Upper and Lower Case Signature, and date it.
Next comes the Form 56, which is the IRS Form called “Notice of Fiduciary Relationship”. This is your Notice to Mr. Mnuchin that you are making him and his office responsible for the PERSON named after you.
The Form 56 is very simple — the name of the PERSON is the NAME on the BC which you are returning to the Treasury.
The name of the Fiduciary is Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury. You can look up the address online. I believe it is 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20220.
Section A (f) — “Other” — Public Commercial Trust Administration
Section B(4) — Check (a) (b) and (h) “Other” and just say, “All forms that may be necessary”.
On the back, Part II, 7 (C) “Other” — Surrender of federal “PERSON” to U.S. Treasury
On the back, Part III “Court and Administrative Proceedings” — enter the name and address of the agency issuing the BC. The “date proceeding initiated” will be the File Date which is never your birthday, but a few days or weeks later. The “docket number” will be the State File Number on the BC. The time will be the time you were actually born, and the place of “other” proceedings will be “usa”.
On the back, Part IV, “Signature” —- you write the word “by” like a by-line to a newspaper story—- by: Your Name (Upper and Lower Case), Authorized Representative, and the date.
Underneath the Signature is a blank space. It is appropriate to say that you wish to be indemnified against claims or losses under the sovereign usa Private Registered Indemnity Bond AMRI00001 RA393427640US.
This is basically a bond posted in behalf of all the actual states of the Union and all the people living in those states insuring them against any further claims related to the MUNICIPAL PERSON(S) they have surrendered back to Mr. Mnuchin.
And that is that. You have now surrendered the MUNICIPAL “CITIZEN” back whence it came and you have insured yourself against any further claims or losses or charges brought against that PERSON.
Along with the Form 56 you should include a brief letter stating that it is your instruction to operate exclusively under 100% commercial liability and without benefit of any limited liability or other benefit of the Public Charitable Trust (PCT).
You are going to send this package of documents via Registered Mail to the Treasury. Each red and white Registered Mail label (available with instructions at all Post Offices) is unique and has an alpha-numeric identifier to track it. This includes a nine-digit number that is compatible with the federal system. As part of your assignment letter, instruct Mr. Mnuchin to open a Treasury Direct Account with that number and to please inform you when it is open for business. Also ask him to settle all debts and charges related to YOUR NAME and deposit the remainder and all other credits owed into the new Treasury Direct Account.
Thank him for his time and attention.
Well, that was a Royal Pain and you shouldn’t have ever been entrapped and obligated by your employees in the first place, but now you have taken action to sever the presumption that you are volunteering to act as a federal MUNICIPAL CITIZEN, and nobody can say otherwise. From now on, “IT” is Mr. Mnuchin’s problem and you are indemnified against any further claims or complaints related to “IT”.
Step 3…. Notify both the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service at Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 480, Holtsville, New York, 11742-0480 and the Internal Revenue Office of the Commissioner, Room 3000, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20204-0002, that you have retired from all presumed federal service and you are revoking your election to pay federal income taxes effective October 1 of 2016. Send these Notices via Registered Mail, too. Save a copy and the mailing receipts and the Green Card Return Receipt Requested for your Eternally Done and Over File.
No more Voter Registration, no more obligation to file Federal Income Taxes and no Municipal United States PERSON for the US DISTRICT COURT — that is, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DISTRICT COURT to address.
That much is done and over.
But there’s more.
You also have to rebut and return the allegation of Territorial United States Citizenship. You do this by recording an Act of Expatriation.
This is as simple as saying that your allegiance is to the soil of your native birth state, say, Louisiana, and that you act only as a private American state trading vessel and birthright member of the unincorporated private trade association doing business as The United States of America.
Now, no matter what kind of word-smithing and duplicitous redefining of terms that goes on forever afterward, no incorporated entity or franchise of any incorporated entity can claim that you are operating as a Foreign Situs Trust belonging to them or abandoned for their benefit—- which was FDR’s fraudulent claim against Americans in 1933.
You have declared that at home you are living on the land and at sea your Name is an American vessel engaged in international trade— not subject to federal regulation of commerce and owed all the protections of the actual Constitution and treaties backing it.
So now they have no grounds to “presume” that you are a Territorial United States Citizen, either.
X and X.
Finally, the rats have created “International Organizations” and run them “in your name”. You need to seize upon these organizations and file liens against them. You do this using a UCC-1 Financing Statement Form. The organizations doing business as your FIRST MIDDLE LAST and FIRST M.I. LAST are the DEBTORS and your non-Territorial Lawful Trade Name (aka Christian Name– First Middle Last) is the Secured Party. This is not a Notice of your interest, because you have already given plenty of public notice. You can lien these organizations directly by checking the “Non-UCC” claim in Box 6.
When filling out the UCC-1 Form be sure to write the names in the proper style. Everything related to the DEBTORS including USA should be in all capital letters. Everything related to the Secured Party should be Upper and Lower Case, except that for the Secured Party it should be “usa” — the actual organic states.
And now, finally, you have provided your employees with a fistful of paperwork refuting all their lies and presumptions about you. They can no longer presume anything about your political status, except that it is private and that you are operating lawfully and without any obligation to them or their organization. Quite the opposite— they are in fact your employees and obligated to you.
Your final stop should be the State Secretary of State’s Office to present him with another copy of “your” authenticated/certified BC.
I want you to stare that man or woman right in the eye and say: “This is prima facie evidence of a Public Trust…..”
If necessary, continue on—– “and also prima facie evidence of intent to defraud.”
“I have reclaimed my birthright political status and I want the proper passport I am owed. If you aren’t authorized to issue it, get on the phone and find out who is.”
If they attempt to drag you into one of their courts ask them where they will find the authority to address you? And where will they find a jury of your peers?
The Great Fraud is over.
The international trustees responsible for this Mess know that it is. You know that it is. It is just a matter of time before the whole world wakes up and goes—- WT…..?
Judge Anna von Reitz
Public Notice Provided to All Federal Employees and Agency Personnel Including IRS/Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Personnel:
Social Security Numbers can only be issued to federal “employees” / “citizens” for use only in the performance of their official duties. See 20 CFR §422.104. SSN’s used as TIN’s apply to the same Persons/PERSONS.
That is, only federal Persons (Territorials) or PERSONS (Municipals) can be issued Social Security Account Numbers/TIN’s and that is the way it has always been, except…….
FDR and the Federal WWII Era Congress got around this and included millions of patriotic Americans by conscripting “volunteers” who agreed to pay federal income taxes as a “Victory Tax”. They did this by arbitrarily defining such voluntary taxpayers as Withholding Agents— Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marines.
The Victory Tax was supposed to sunset upon the “cessation of hostilities”, however, in September of 1945, Congress conveniently forgot to put a specific end date on this arrangement and the Internal Revenue Service continued to collect –thus changing this from a voluntary arrangement to help win the war– to an international extortion racket.
This is your reminder that the Second World War hostilities ended in September of 1945.
Any American “volunteer” who isn’t actually and naturally eligible for Social Security and who wishes to “retire” from the presumption of federal service and who revokes their election to pay federal taxes must be immediately set free and permanently released from any obligation to report, to pay, or accept responsibility for any federal Person/PERSON, and cannot otherwise be encumbered, imposed upon, or subjected by any agency or department of the federal territorial or municipal government (s).
Compulsory “citizenship” does not exist.
Those who have “retired” after becoming vested in the Social Security System as a result of this abuse are owed all their money back and/or all services promised at the time of their enrollment with no presumption of continued federal citizenship or its obligations attaching to them.
The continued issuance of Social Security Numbers to people who aren’t actually federal employees and either United States Citizens or citizens of the United States is illegal entrapment under conditions of non-disclosure and deceit; it results in mischaracterization of political status, involuntary servitude, identity theft, unlawful conversion of assets and other evils of racketeering committed against Americans who have been deliberately misinformed and told that they have to enroll in Social Security as a requirement of having a job—-any job.
Enrollment in Social Security is only required if they happen to be seeking direct employment with the federal government or are otherwise legitimately considered federal government dependents—verifiable political asylum seekers, etc.
Those born in one of the actual states of the Union who retire from such employment, including military employment, or who, owing no natural allegiance to the Territorial or Municipal governments, and having never been employed by the federal government(s), simply realize these facts and revoke their “election” to pay federal income taxes and cease thereafter to function as voluntary Withholding Agents must be set free from the presumption of any further territorial or municipal obligation.
A similar entrapment occurs when American State Citizens are encouraged to vote in federal and federated state/county elections. When they “register” to vote, they unknowingly give up their rights as stockholders and electors — an undisclosed loss — and they become “enfranchised” as presumed operators of federal corporation franchises. This sleight-of-hand conversion of Americans from electors into mere voters again serves to mischaracterize them and defraud them and subject them and deprive them of their natural birthright and material interests at the hands of people who are in fact their employees.
As none of these losses and obligations are ever fully disclosed no valid private contract can be alleged and any American who subsequently rescinds a voter registration must be removed from all registration databases and held harmless from any presumption of federal enfranchisement.
Let’s just use this one small example of the Big Lie federal employees have been told and that they have been enforcing upon others…..continuing from (1) quoting from Christopher Chapman now:
“§ 422.104. Who can be assigned a social security number.
(a) Persons eligible for SSN assignment. We can assign you a social security number if you meet the evidence requirements in § 422.107 and you are:
(1) A United States citizen; or
(2) An alien lawfully admitted to the United States….
Let’s examine the definition of United States (U.S.) used in Title 26 to see if average Americans who are not employed by the federal government are citizens of the U.S…..
In most statutes (statute law) the Unites States referred to is federal territory, just as it is in Title 26—- i.e.:
26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions
(9) United States
The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes only the States and the District of Columbia.
(10) State —-The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
The term “State” exposes the truth that the term “United States” means the District of Columbia and no other.
Let us review, specifically the history of the evolution of this term
The code of Federal Regulation is very definitive by using the word “its”, in lieu of, “their”
Title 26 CFR § 1.1-1(a)(1) provides, in pertinent part:
(1) Section 1 of the [Internal Revenue] Code imposes an income tax on the income of every individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States ….
(c) Who is a citizen. Every person born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its [District of Columbia] jurisdiction is a citizen.
The 1939 Code through 1954 the definition of “State”:
Alaska is a U.S. Territory
Hawaii is a U.S. Territory
• 7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the Territories and the District of Colombia, where such construction is necessary to carry out the provisions of this title.
Alaska joins the Union, so strikeout “Territories” and substitute “Territory of Hawaii”:
Alaska is a State of the Union
Hawaii is a U.S. Territory
• 7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the Territory of Hawaii and the District of Colombia, where such construction is necessary to carry out the provisions of this title.
Hawaii joins the Union, strikeout “the Territory of Hawaii and” immediately after the word “include”:
Alaska is a State of the Union
Hawaii is a State of the Union
• 7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
Notice how Alaska and Hawaii only fit these definitions of [Territorial] “State” before they were declared to be States of the United States of America, and now are hereby admitted into the Union on equal footing with the original States, in all respects whatsoever. [emphasis added]
Let’s examine some court cases that further solidifies this subject:
Before the 14th amendment [sic] in 1868:
A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing. To conceive a citizen of the United States who is not a citizen of some one of the States, is totally foreign to the idea, and inconsistent with the proper construction and common understanding of the expression as used in the Constitution, which must be deduced from its various other provisions. The object then to be attained, by the exercise of the power of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective States. [Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855)] [bold emphasis added]
It is true, every person, and every class and description of persons, who were at the time of the adoption of the Constitution recognized as citizens in the several States, became also citizens of this new political body; but none other; it was formed by them, and for them and their posterity, but for no one else. And the personal rights and privileges guarantied [sic] to citizens of this new sovereignty were intended to embrace those only who were then members of the several state communities, or who should afterwards, by birthright or otherwise, become members, according to the provisions of the Constitution and the principles on which it was founded. [Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393, 404 (1856)] [bold emphasis added]
… [F]or it is certain, that in the sense in which the word “Citizen” is used in the federal Constitution, “Citizen of each State,” and “Citizen of the United States***,” are convertible terms; they mean the same thing; for “the Citizens of each State are entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States,” and “Citizens of the United States***” are, of course, Citizens of all the United States***. [44 Maine 518 (1859), Hathaway, J. dissenting] [italics in original, underlines & C’s added]
As it was the adoption of the Constitution by the Conventions of nine States that established and created the United States***, it is obvious there could not then have existed any person who had been seven years a citizen of the United States***, or who possessed the Presidential qualifications of being thirty-five years of age, a natural born citizen, and fourteen years a resident of the United States***. The United States*** in these provisions, means the States united. To be twenty-five years of age, and for seven years to have been a citizen of one of the States which ratifies the Constitution, is the qualification of a representative. To be a natural born citizen of one of the States which shall ratify the Constitution, or to be a citizen of one of said States at the time of such ratification, and to have attained the age of thirty-five years, and to have been fourteen years a resident within one of the said States, are the Presidential qualifications, according to the true meaning of the Constitution. [People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870)] [bold and underline emphasis added]
After the 14th amendment [sic] in 1868:
It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States** and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual. [Slaughter House Cases, 83 U.S. 36] [(1873) emphasis added]
The first clause of the fourteenth amendment made negroes citizens of the United States**, and citizens of the State in which they reside, and thereby created two classes of citizens, one of the United States** and the other of the state. [Cory et al. v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327][(1874) headnote 8, emphasis added]
We have in our political system a Government of the United States** and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own …. [U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542] [(1875) emphasis added]
One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States. Thomasson v. State, 15 Ind. 449; Cory v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327 (17 Am. R. 738); McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz, 16 Wis. 443. [McDonel v. State, 90 Ind. 320, 323] [(1883) underlines added]
A person who is a citizen of the United States** is necessarily a citizen of the particular state in which he resides. But a person may be a citizen of a particular state and not a citizen of the United States**. To hold otherwise would be to deny to the state the highest exercise of its sovereignty, — the right to declare who are its citizens. [State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380] [6 S. 602 (1889), emphasis added]
The first clause of the fourteenth amendment of the federal Constitution made negroes citizens of the United States**, and citizens of the state in which they reside, and thereby created two classes of citizens, one of the United States** and the other of the state.
[4 Dec. Dig. ’06, p. 1197, sec. 11]
[“Citizens” (1906), emphasis added]
There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, one of the United States** and one of the state. One class of citizenship may exist in a person, without the other, as in the case of a resident of the District of Columbia; but both classes usually exist in the same person. [Gardina v. Board of Registrars, 160 Ala. 155]
[48 S. 788, 791 (1909), emphasis added]
There is a distinction between citizenship of the United States** and citizenship of a particular state, and a person may be the former without being the latter.
[Alla v. Kornfeld, 84 F.Supp. 823] [(1949) headnote 5, emphasis added]
A person may be a citizen of the United States** and yet be not identified or identifiable as a citizen of any particular state. [Du Vernay v. Ledbetter] [61 So.2d 573, emphasis added]
… citizens of the District of Columbia were not granted the privilege of litigating in the federal courts on the ground of diversity of citizenship. Possibly no better reason for this fact exists than such citizens were not thought of when the judiciary article [III] of the federal Constitution was drafted. … citizens of the United States** … were also not thought of; but in any event, a citizen of the United States**, who is not a citizen of any state, is not within the language of the [federal] Constitution. [Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914] [emphasis added]
That there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a state, and the privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other is well established by the decisions of the courts of this country. [Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)]
No fortifying authority is necessary to sustain the proposition that in the United States a double citizenship exists. A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the Federal Government and at the same time a citizen of the State in which he resides. Determination of what is qualified residence within a State is not here necessary. Suffice it to say that one possessing such double citizenship owes allegiance and is entitled to protection from each sovereign to whose jurisdiction he is subject. [Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp. 383 (USDC/WDMO 1953)]
The privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates any of the Bill of Rights nor protects all rights of individual citizens. See Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1873). Instead, this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship.
[Jones v. Temmer, 829 F.Supp. 1226 (USDC/DCO 1993)]” unquote Christopher Chapman.
Attacking Americans who are not obligated in any way to pay federal income taxes, and certainly not obligated to pay “municipal” taxes merely disguised more generally as “federal” taxes, is against the law, both statutory and Public. Coercing exempt persons and/or denying their claim of exemption is a criminal act of extortionate racketeering and inland piracy.
There are American state nationals (people who live as non-federal, non-citizens) and American State Citizens (who occupy public offices of the land jurisdiction states). These are distinctly different groups within one Body Politic which are foreign to the “United States” as defined in Title 26 and throughout Federal Code.
None of them are naturally liable to pay federal income taxes and none of them are subject to territorial or municipal law. The sooner IRS employees become fully acquainted with these facts and the limitations of their powers and jurisdictions with respect to these Americans, the better for everyone involved.
These facts are underwritten by the most fundamental principles giving rise to the government of this country. Please note the following:
The limited and exclusive power of legislation conferred on the Congress and the geographic authority of these powers is summed up by these controlling sections of the actual Constitution:
• “power of personal and subject-matter legislation throughout the Union and upon the high seas at Art, I, § 8, cl. 1-16;
• “power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation over (what will be) the District of Columbia at Art, I, § 8, cl. 17; and
• “constructive (implied) power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation at Art. IV, § 3, cl. 2 in the form of ‘Rules and Regulations,’ id., ‘respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States,’ id., i.e., federal territories and enclaves.
Please note that the Constitution confers upon Congress no power of territorial legislation over any person or property anywhere in the Union.
Unless a person is naturally and/or truly voluntarily subject to the Territorial “United States” defined as the District of Columbia in Title 26, they cannot be subjected as a Municipal citizen, either; and Congress has no delegated legislative power allowing it to usurp its territorial or municipal authority upon the actual states and people otherwise.
Read that as—-no, means no. There’s a difference between consensual sex, and rape.
When people born on the land of one of the actual organic states claim their non-territorial, non-municipal, non-citizen political status and give evidence of the same intention by issuing an Act of Expatriation from the presumption of Territorial citizenship, and the surrender of the Municipal PERSON issued to them back to the Secretary of the Treasury, and otherwise give Notice of their revocation of election to pay federal income taxes or to otherwise subject themselves and their assets to any territorial or municipal code, that decision must be respected and adhered to by all agents of the territorial and municipal government without question or exception.
You can tax actual federal territorial and municipal employees all you like. You can tax political asylum seekers and immigrants. You can tax people who are knowingly and voluntarily officers and employees of federally chartered corporations.
What you cannot do is to blindly assume that the existence of a Social Security Number and Masterfile Account establishes any valid basis for presuming (1) the political status of any individual or (2) any basis for assuming and assessing federal tax liabilities or other merely presumed obligations.
This circumstance is the result of self-interested mismanagement of federal agencies and departments for several generations. It derives from the wholesale distribution of Social Security Numbers and accounts by the Social Security Administration without respect for the limitations imposed by the actual law and without full disclosure to applicants. It derives from purposeful efforts of the Congress to receive income from Americans under false pretenses—the presumption that they are knowingly and willingly acting as “volunteer” Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marine Service. Most of all, it results from widespread ignorance among Revenue Agents, federal program administrators, and the general public.
All federal employees, all federal Territorial and Municipal citizens, all federal program administrators and managers need to be fully cognizant of these facts and you are encouraged to share them with your staff, your domestic judicial officers, your family and your friends.
Federal service is meant to be an honorable occupation worthy of respect and support, but when it devolves to purposeful racketeering against the people this same service is meant to serve, prosecution and conflict is the inevitable result.
It is important for federal employees –-especially revenue agents and federal territorial and municipal judicial officers— to realize that when they misapply the law and contribute to these self-interested confusions they are committing serious crimes of racketeering, unlawful conversion of assets, inland piracy, personage, and barratry against their employers and benefactors. These international crimes against Americans have been promoted by the federal governmental services corporations under a pretense of war and wartime necessity. It is, therefore, necessary to also address this claim.
The Territorial aka “Federal” Government was created in 1868 in the wake of what is misleadingly called the “American Civil War” upon the release of the so-called Federal Constitution. This document, the “Constitution of the United States of America” presents articles of incorporation for a corporation doing business as the “United States of America” cleverly disguised via similar names deceit to resemble the actual Constitution.
Please note that the actual constitution is: “The Constitution for the united States of America”, not “the Constitution of the United States of America”. And both these documents are different from the municipal constitution called the “Constitution of the United States”.
This conflict, the so-called “Civil War”, was, in fact, an illegal commercial mercenary conflict taking place on our shores. It was never declared by any action of the united States of America in Congress Assembled, and it was never resolved by any peace treaty. Instead, President Johnson declared peace on the land jurisdiction via three public declarations creating a binding contract mandating peace—once again underscoring the fact that this was a commercial mercenary action and no form of actual “war” at all.
Ever since then there has been no sovereign government invoked, and no competent land jurisdiction Congress of the actual states of the Union has been convened. As a result, all so-called “wars” have, instead, been commercial mercenary actions carried out by corporations and/or internal domestic police actions.
Read that as: Congress has no “war powers”. “War” has specific requirements and definitions under international law, and, twist and turn as they might, the members of Congress— as that body has operated since 1860 —can not declare actual war or take refuge in any claim of war powers or any doctrine of necessity with respect to the actual states and people of the Union. What began as a fraudulent and illegal commercial mercenary action remains a fraudulent and illegal commercial mercenary action subject to prosecution as fraud.
It should surprise nobody that the actions of Congress seeking to enrich itself and to usurp against the lawful government of the actual United States by bolstering its territorial hegemony and deceptively terming it the [territorial] “United States” as seen in Title 26, is conceived in fraud and word-smithing and similar names deceits going back six generations.
All Territorial (States of States) and Municipal (STATES OF STATES) are merely franchises of self-interested federal commercial corporations. They have no vested authority related to the American states and people and have fraudulently usurped upon the jurisdiction and property assets of their employers.
Without the ability to engage in actual war these various commercial corporations have rampaged around under false pretenses and have criminally trespassed on the Americans they are supposed to provide with “essential government services”. They have also caused a great deal of trouble throughout the rest of the world.
As federal employees and as citizens of the Territorial and Municipal “United States” it is very important for you to become fully aware of the limitations of your position of limited delegated authority and the substantially unfavorable circumstances created by these past actions, events, and public policies espoused by these various incorporated entities.
You should also know that there is no “state” immunity available to invoke as protection against your actions as employees of commercial corporations and in most cases, your offices are not properly insured or bonded. The sovereign government of this country is vested entirely in the American people and their jural assemblies at both the county and state levels. Their states are the only ones enjoying sovereign immunity.
This Public Notice is provided in the interest of avoiding unnecessary conflicts between Americans and their federal employees.
All legal presumptions regarding political status based on the existence of Social Security Numbers and Masterfile Accounts are being based on unsupportable evidence obtained under conditions of non-disclosure and semantic deceit and implemented via the purposeful World War II Victory Tax circumvention of the actual law pertaining to the issuance of Social Security Numbers.
Such presumptions of federal territorial or federal municipal citizenship cannot be maintained in the face of direct objection and reasonable proof of revocation by American state nationals and American State Citizens.
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents
The American States and People
c/o 1336 Staubbach Circle
Anchorage, Alaska 99508
“Contract makes the law.”
ancient legal Maxim
A4V does NOT mean that you do not have to pay your legitimate debts resulting from CONTRACTS you voluntarily sign — and any articles claiming that you can pay off all your debts simply by signing an A4V statement on a bill are TOTAL NONSENSE.
“Acceptance for Value” is a remedy available only in commercial law (the Uniform Commercial Code or UCC). One can “accept for value” ONLY a commercial instrument that has been “issued for value”, that is when
1.) the instrument has been issued to generate value where there is NO prior value; AND when
2.) the instrument (such as a bill or a charge) has NO signed contract to back it up.
In short, an instrument “issued for value” is an OFFER TO CONTRACT from someone (the ISSUER), unbacked by a pre-existing, written contract, in which that person is attempting to get YOU to give value to that instrument by having you falsely believe that you owe money when you, in fact, owe nothing.
HOW you respond, determines whether YOU or the ISSUER becomes liable for the amount claimed.
If you ignore the offer (and therefore “dishonor” the person making the offer) or give it a “blank endorsement” (with your signature only), you have assumed liability for the amount specified.
However, if you give the instrument a “qualified endorsement” or “conditional acceptance” (by “accepting it for value“), you have, in fact, made a counteroffer, and kept yourself in “honor” by responding to the original offer, and thereby kept the liability on the ISSUER.
In the case of a bill sent to you, your “qualified endorsement” via “accepted for value” keeps the ISSUER liable for the money claimed – NOT you! You retain your status as the creditor in the situation, and it is up to YOU whether that instrument (the bill or charge you received) becomes a negotiable instrument (money) with which you can settle the account.
You can either “accept for value”, placing all liability for payment on the original issuer; OR you can “accept for value” and then specify that the money will be paid using the money created by your government bond created by your Birth Certificate under the emergency laws enacted following the bankruptcy of the U.S. in 1933.
(Note: In the bankruptcy of 1933 the U.S. government took ownership of all land and possessions of the American people, including the people themselves as “surety” for further loans from the Federal Reserve and the international bankers. Under the legal TRUST created by the U.S. Constitution, such a taking action would have been outright theft and fraud, so the government was required to offer a “remedy” to the people, as the beneficiaries of that TRUST, in order to exercise their rights, if they so choose.)
Since the issuer had NO signed, written contract to back his claim, he was forced to “issue for value” (i.e., issue it in an attempt to create value) his instrument (whether a bill, legal “indictment”, traffic ticket or other violation of a statute, any demand for payment, or whatever).
In essence, the issuer is throwing you a “hot potato” and is hoping you will be ignorant enough to simply accept the instrument – as a contract offer – as it is; and give it value by ignoring it or by your “blank endorsement”; and to thereby accept the liability for paying it.
If you “accept it for value” and “return it for value”, you have tossed him back the hot potato in the form of a counteroffer, so that he (the issuer) becomes liable for the amount of money specified in his original instrument’s claim, unbacked by any pre-existing contract.
Consequently, the instrument issued pays the instrument! The original issuer pays the original issue – he pays himself. Therefore, the transaction is balanced to zero and closed.
Of note: In ALL penal actions for violations of STATUTES, the national debt is the PRESUMED preexisting contract, for purchase, that influences the conscience of the judge in making his decisions.
Since under the Laws of God and the Natural Law (derived from God’s Law), ALL men are equal in authority. Therefore, no man or body of men can legitimately coerce or force another man to do something against his wishes and will!
Consequently, under the Common Law, and international commercial law, NO man can be forced into a contract against his wishes, AND there must be equal “consideration” (things of equal VALUE) exchanged between the parties, with full disclosure of information, in order for a contract to be valid.
It appears that today, few Americans realize that under long-standing international law, ALL legislated STATUTES or ACTS – by any legislative body – are mere OFFERS TO CONTRACT, which any individual man has the right to accept or refuse, as he wishes.
One must remember that since 1933, ALL statutes (legislated laws) in the U.S. exist to pay back the national debt of the U.S. to the Federal Reserve banks and other U.S. creditors – and they want you to agree and consent to be liable for this debt!
Therefore, if a district attorney issues an “information” (similar to an indictment, but not requiring a grand jury) to you charging you with a crime, you have three choices regarding his “offer to contract”.
First, you can IGNORE it, in which case you are in “dishonor” and assume liability for payment in either money or service in prison to repay the national debt.
Second, you can SIGN it without conditions (called an “unqualified endorsement” or “blank endorsement”), then you have created a negotiable instrument by giving it value and have assumed liability for paying it, which can then be enforced by the issuer (the district attorney as the government) to help pay off the national debt.
OR third, you can sign the “information” with a “qualified endorsement” using “accept for value” (a “counteroffer”), by which you give that instrument a monetary value, but keep the liability for paying it on the ISSUER.
So, in the case of legal charges against you by a district attorney or a court clerk (usually by a traffic ticket issued by a police officer), through an “accept for value” endorsement you have avoided all liability; and kept the liability for payment (as money and/or a prison sentence) on the district attorney and/or court clerk – it is then, THEY who need to pay the fine or fulfill the imposed prison sentence for that statute violation; NOT you, since you did not accept liability.
They tossed a hot potato to you and expected you to pay. But since they had NO signed, written contract in which you agreed to obey that particular statute, they were required under U.C.C. commercial law to issue that document for value – that is, to issue it in the hope that YOU would give it value AND take liability for paying it by accepting it without any qualifications. However, by your “accept for value” qualified endorsement, you agreed to it and gave it its value, but declined to accept liability for payment. Then by returning the instrument (the charges against you), you tossed the hot potato back to them – and kept THEM liable for any payments!
This system may sound INSANE, but this is how the financial and legal system was set up following the 1933 bankruptcy of the U.S., along with the amended extensions of national “emergency” of 1917 and 1933. When you go to court, you go to a “legislative-statutory court” – in essence, a Maritime-Admiralty court – operating under the UCC bankruptcy code whose sole purpose is to fund the national debt – NOT into a true “judicial court”. You are PRESUMED “guilty” and are subject to a “summary judgment” without any trial by jury, unless you simultaneously convene your OWN “court-of-record” under the Common Law within that courtroom. And that system is still in effect today within the U.S.
SAMPLE A4V “qualified endorsement”:
The qualified endorsement is –
Accepted for Value – without recourse
Exempt from Levy
signature__________________ Date ______
Exemption Identification Number 123456789 (your Social Security trust number)
Deposit to the U.S. Treasury and charge the same to JOHN H DOE 123-45-6789 (if it is the birth certificate or social security bond number).
One should be aware that the charge need NOT be made to the U.S. Treasury. In fact, you can charge it to whoever issued it to you. The value can be charged to a clerk of court for case # ____________ or to the police officer who issued the ticket.
It can be charged to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service for account # 123-45-6789 if it is a tax bill.
Electric bills (payment vouchers) have the bank routing numbers and amount of the voucher printed in magnetic ink right on the bottom of the bills. The utility companies are actually sending you the voucher to pay the bill, with the statement every month.
Even so, they might decide to turn off your service if you do not send them a “thank you” check, in addition to returning the voucher with your proper endorsement.
IRS also sends the voucher on the final demand before lien or levy.
A voucher can be “a written record of expenditure, disbursement, or completed transaction, or it can be a written authorization or certificate, especially one exchangeable for cash or representing a credit against future expenditures”.
It would need to be endorsed before submitting it as a credit. A “blank endorsement” (your signature only) puts the liability on the endorser, you. A qualified endorsement, a counter-offer with new conditions along with your signature, puts the liability back onto the original issuer.
Free Reference Material You Should Read “What Does Accepted for Value Mean?”
Re-post from https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2017/04/12/accepted-for-value-a4v-u-c-c-commercial-remedy/
Freedom, Rights and the Common Law
Also See: “Accepted for Value” ( A4V ) — BEST Explanation of this U.C.C. Commercial REMEDY
Did You Find This Information Useful? Ongoing Research Efforts Require Ongoing Support.
Invest In Your Freedom Education with a Donation!
We Thank You in Advance for Your Generous Support!
One Time Donation
You Choose the Amount
The America States Assembly Weekly webinar. Learn and grow with us as we restore our lawful government with Peace and Love
Solutions Actions, Remedy