Introduction: The War against Labor

We are in the fight of our lives.  The hostile onslaught against U.S. labor that was launched after the Second World War and redoubled in the 1980s is entering a new phase that will profoundly influence the future of all working people in North America.  How we respond to this latest assault of capitalism might well prove to be the pivotal contest of modern times.
The iron law of capitalist production--the zero-sum relationship between profit and wages --is becoming more skewed every day.  During the last half of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st, U.S. capitalism consolidated its control of the existing political apparatus to maximize profits at the expense of the working people of this nation and abroad through a protracted war of attrition.
Map 1 summarizes the history of the conflict.

CONTINUE...

An alliance of multinational companies, global consulting firms, including Gavi or Vaccine Alliance, Rockefeller Foundation, Microsoft, etc. has been formed to provide a “holistic and market-based approach” to help governments of the world provide a “good national ID” to “prove who you are” because it is “a fundamental and universal human right.”
They will do this in conjunction with government-funded mandatory vaccinations. What could possibly go wrong?
Imagine how backward this thinking really is. Instead of looking for healthcare solutions, they are instead working on the perfection of their control grid as if their financial grip on everyone is not enough. Continue

By Representative Sam E. Rohrer
August 24, 2008
NewsWithViews.com
History offers many examples of societies which have sought to increase security by sacrificing freedom. America itself provides many pertinent instances. However, our founding fathers have not left us without wisdom on this issue. Ben Franklin has famously stated, "People willing to trade freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both." REAL ID undoubtedly exemplifies a scenario in which a difficult tension exists between freedom and security. By commandeering every state's driver's license issuing process, REAL ID threatens the results warned by Franklin - loss of both freedom and security. It has become the biometric enrollment phase of a plan to implement a terribly invasive tracking system, largely without public knowledge or approval. REAL ID is merely the current face of a far larger, international government and private economic effort to collect, store, and distribute the sensitive biometric data of citizens to use for the twin purposes of government tracking and economic control. At issue are much more than standardized or non-duplicative driver's licenses. This effort extends worldwide, threatening every person alive today. Although very legitimate security concerns exist in this age of terrorism, this Act extends far beyond terrorism prevention or protection of the innocent. Keeping that broad picture in mind, let us move to some background behind the face of REAL ID implementation in America.
The REAL ID Act passed Congress in 2005 buried in a "must-pass" war funding and tsunami relief bill. The little debate in the House and total absence of debate in the Senate ensured that many Congressmen did not realize the full implications of REAL ID. Importantly, the desire by government and economic interests to implement a national tracking and ID system did not start with the REAL ID Act in 2005. Under the guise of security, it has been attempted numerous times in the past, even during Ronald Reagan's administration. When former Attorney General William French Smith proposed to implement what he called a "perfectly harmless" national ID system as well as when a second cabinet member proposed to "tattoo a number on each American's forearm," Ronald Reagan responded, "My God, that's the mark of the beast," signaling an abrupt end to the national ID debate during the Reagan years.
The significant opposition to a national ID system in the past extends to the REAL ID issue today. This conviction has united both Democrats and Republicans as well as such normally opposed groups as the ACLU and the ACLJ. Whether the concern is privacy, religious rights, states' rights, or cost of implementation, REAL ID has galvanized broad and deep resistance, currently including an estimated six hundred groups. Today, over twenty legislatures have passed resolutions or legislation variously opposing implementation of the REAL ID Act. Eleven of those legislatures have gone further by passing laws specifically prohibiting compliance with REAL ID.
What does REAL ID do?
REAL ID attempts to mandate a standardized process and format for all state drivers' licenses to achieve increased security. Most importantly in this standardized process, REAL ID mandates a certain picture quality. A footnote issued by the Department of Homeland Security establishes this quality as compliant with the ICAO Document 9303 biometric format.
The global body setting this format, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), is a specialized agency created under the United Nations.
Biometric data can be produced from a simple digital photograph of this quality by running the picture of a person's face through a software program which measures and analyzes the unique, personally identifiable characteristics of that face.
The process results in a unique numeric code which identifies a person according to facial measurements. You read that correctly. A unique number or "code" is developed from an algorithmic formula which converts a digital biometric sample to biometric "face print" data. Under REAL ID biometric facial recognition technology, you become a number literally worn on your face - a number which is read by computer, tracked by surveillance camera, and distributed worldwide. Clearly, this international standard provides global compatibility of American citizens' biometric data collected through REAL ID.
Having this background, we should observe that many Americans still do not know why the provisions of the REAL ID Act must be rejected and aggressively opposed because they do not understand the full implications of REAL ID. Many wrongly assume that the legitimate need for security trumps all other considerations. However, REAL ID is not primarily about a secure driver's license or terrorism prevention. The full and dangerous implications of REAL ID may be fleshed out through a discussion of why each American must vigorously oppose this Act's most basic tenets. It poses dangers in the following three areas:
1 - REAL ID violates Constitutional rights.
2 - REAL ID compromises national and state sovereignty.
3 - REAL ID threatens the safety of all Americans.
I- First, let us note that compliance with REAL ID would violate our constitutionally protected freedoms.
Amendment I - Freedom of Religion
REAL ID violates freedom of religion for some citizens by forcing inclusion into a system which requires a picture - and more - just to access public services. The Amish and some Mennonites provide examples of religious groups who view the mere taking of photographs as idolatry. REAL ID conditions their freedoms, such as entering a federal building, upon a provision which violates their religious beliefs. Because this "government" identification system limits travel and access to certain public places, and could even become a debit card, other more mainline religious groups view REAL ID as the advent of the "mark of the beast."
Particularly because this technology assigns a unique number to represent each person's biometric face print, these concerns are hardly unfounded.
A PowerPoint presentation from L-1 Identity Solutions, the major biometrics company in the U.S. today, bolsters this claim. A slide in that presentation includes a graph which charts future likely applications for biometrics.
Phase 1 of this "blueprint" for biometric implementation utilizes the authority of Federal agencies to impose such requirements as REAL ID.
Phase 2 utilizes bureaucratic leveraging on regulated industries to implement biometrics. Phase 3 anticipates mass implementation on the citizens at large for such everyday activities as buying and selling. As an example, under Phase 2 DHS is attempting to force airlines to pick up the costs of collecting biometrics from foreigners at airports. In Texas under
Phase 3, a company is experimenting with using the driver's license as a debit card. Whether one is personally alarmed at some or all of these concerns, REAL ID would prohibit the free exercise of religion for many people.

Amendment IV – Freedom of Privacy
REAL ID also violates the Fourth Amendment's guarantee of freedom of privacy.
First, by mandating the collection, storage, and dissemination of personally identifiable data without any informed consent, REAL ID tramples on this right. In reality, this practice constitutes government-sanctioned identity theft and seriously breaches the "security of person" guaranteed to every U.S. citizen. No sufficiently compelling need exists to warrant government mass collection and storage of such sensitive information about its citizens. Concern heightens even further when private corporations control the databases being set up to house this information. As an example, L-1 Identity Solutions houses a database of U.S. driver's license information. This company, which has consolidated a virtual monopoly on the driver's license issuing market in the U.S., will handle all private information collected during the license issuing process.
Secondly, REAL ID threatens freedom of privacy because this warehoused data cannot be confidently secured.
Even the Department of Homeland Security's own Privacy Impact Assessment fails to guarantee that the database linking and networking that will result from REAL ID will be secure. Many privacy experts agree that REAL ID will actually increase identity theft! In reality, the database and access to it will create an electronic superhighway for potential mass identity theft.
Thirdly, REAL ID violates the Fourth Amendment in that the process of collecting personal biometric data without consent violates the very laws that exist to protect against such measures.
This is probably one of the most significant Constitutional issues. Current US law allows the collection of biometric information only in the case of criminal activity. However, REAL ID institutionalizes the capture of facial recognition biometrics for every driver, regardless of criminality.
Fourthly, REAL ID ripens the climate for aggressive efforts to control the masses via information and leading-edge technology, regardless of crucial privacy considerations.
Data collection and surveillance is simultaneously occurring across several diverse fronts, each one a potential privacy danger painting the broader picture of where REAL ID will take us as a country. For instance:
1- In Rhode Island, a school district is allowing a company to place radio frequency tracking (RFID) chips in students' book bags.
2- Nationwide, Great Britain has installed an estimated 4.2 million surveillance cameras utilizing facial recognition technology to keep tabs on all citizens. These cameras, of which there is 1 for every 14 citizens, can observe a person up to 300 times in a normal day in the city of London.
3- China is aggressively pursuing country-wide surveillance of its citizens using facial recognition technology purchased from a contractor supplied by the previously mentioned L-1 Identity Solutions.
4- According to a June 28, 2008 New York Times article, US and European officials are nearly agreed upon a "binding international agreement" which would allow "European governments and companies to transfer personal information to the United States, and vice versa." Under the cloak of terrorism prevention, European governments could request "private information - like credit card transactions, travel histories, and Internet browsing habits" about American citizens.
5- Homeland Security Presidential Directive 24 issued by the President on June 5, 2008, "establishes a framework to ensure that Federal executive departments and agencies use mutually compatible methods and procedures in the collection, storage, use, analysis, and sharing of biometric and associated biographic and contextual information of individuals." This step shows the President's extensive authority and disregard for privacy in streamlining the biometric sharing process.
6- The FBI is currently building a billion-dollar database to house an enormous amount of biometric data. While officially aimed at housing criminal and terrorist data, this database already retains finger prints, iris scans and other individual biometrics that the government collects on ordinary citizens. Who knows the extent of the private information that will be stored in this massive database? REAL ID-collected "face prints" are just one more piece of the data collection and tracking system.
These examples only serve to underscore the aggressive global government efforts to track and control citizens. In every case, REAL ID violates the freedoms guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.
Amendment X – States' Rights
REAL ID violates the Tenth Amendment in that the federal government is attempting to force the states to collect private data on their citizens, only to allow that data to be shipped out-of-state and shared worldwide. This action forces the states to work against the very interests of the citizens they are to protect. When states accede to this pressure under REAL ID, they allow the transfer of state authority to the federal government. The separation of powers built into our Constitution then crumbles as the federal government makes the rules, interprets the rules, and enforces the rules regarding all state drivers' licenses.

II- In addition to the three ways REAL ID would violate the Constitution, compliance with the REAL ID Act would undermine our national and state sovereignty. While REAL ID reads like a manual for a national ID card, the Department of Homeland Security's own rules for REAL ID reveal that it implements an international ID system based on biometric identification. Complying with the requirements under REAL ID would violate U.S. national and state sovereignty by forcing states to adopt international biometric facial image standards and to document standards set by international organizations.
As mentioned previously, the ICAO, affiliated with the UN, sets the standards for facial image captures (photos). Besides tracking the movements of international travelers, the ICAO also has assumed the responsibility of creating a common international passport system that stores individual personal and biometric information on a RFID chip built into the passport. The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA), which recognizes ICAO standards, "enables" this scheme. This international body and private organization sets nearly all the standards for REAL ID document scanning, storage, data encryption, bar-code and layout design to comply with their 2005 international driver's license system. Under REAL ID, AAMVA is the hub and backbone of the database system being set up to share information between states. From a broad perspective, the system created by REAL ID destroys national sovereignty and constitutional authority by removing control of government from the people and establishing government control over the people.

Furthering AAMVA's control strategy here in North America, implementation of REAL ID is "de facto" enrollment of each state into AAMVA's Driver's License Agreement (DLA). AAMVA has pushed the DLA, which meets REAL ID specifications, for nearly ten years. The implementation of this DLA is crucially important to the global effort because it mandates the sharing of all U.S. drivers' license information with Mexico and Canada. This egregious step places U.S. citizen's data at the mercy of Canadian and Mexican privacy controls, further exacerbating the identity theft problem, and violating Constitutional law and national sovereignty by essentially having states form a treaty with a foreign nation.
REAL ID also violates national sovereignty because any international system includes and requires agreements and obligations that would weaken any sovereign standing. In fact, a Government Computer News report notes the following from Robert Mocny, acting program manager for the U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology program. His quote comes from comments about a federal plan to extend biometric data sharing to Asian and European governments and corporations, so as to create a Global Security Envelope of identity management.

"My question is, how is it ethical not to share?" Mocny asked. "It makes no sense for us to develop separate systems . . . information sharing is appropriate around the world." Government Computer News further notes that he is sketching a plan for sharing biometric data that would permanently link an individual with data that governments and corporations hold. Since both governments and corporations have been infiltrated by extremists and terrorists and since certain governments of today may be our enemies tomorrow, I hardly think that worldwide sharing of our citizen's data is a good idea!

Enhanced Driver's Licenses (or EDL's) provide a further example of the undermining of national and state sovereignty. Citizens that purchase these nearly REAL ID-compliant licenses, which contain biographic and biometric information on an RFID chip, can use them as a passport to enter either Mexico or Canada. This advancement establishes the international ID designation of REAL ID. The Canadian province British Columbia has also issued a new EDL which, according to their website is also, "an acceptable document for entry from Canada into the United States by land and water."

REAL ID violates state sovereignty because the issue in contention is "national identity management", with the federal government manipulating the tool of state driver's licenses. Consider the following statements about REAL ID from Electronic Data Systems, the very company likely to maintain AAMVA's driver's license database: "The Real ID Act, then, is about more than a driver's license. It puts in place a set of standards for Identity Management (IdM) that can be leveraged across an entire government organization to create an integrated citizen identity security program." The international biometric standards mandated in DHS's final rules, paint the broader picture of an international ID card for government surveillance and tracking.

III- REAL ID would endanger Constitutional rights and both national and state sovereignty. Finally, let us consider that compliance with the REAL ID Act would compromise the safety of our people. Unlike what some government officials might say, 9/11 and the prevention of terrorism are not the real reasons for REAL ID. In fact, this technology was being pushed well before 9/11. Although REAL ID and biometrics are promoted as the "cure-all" to terrorism and identity theft problems, many highly dispute this claim.

In response to the post-9/11 claims of biometrics companies that their technology could have prevented 9/11, Jim Wayman, the former head of the US Biometrics Center countered, "No, the government didn't have this stuff in place, precisely because it had been working on it and knew its limitations and didn't find any value for the costs involved." He further noted, "It's going to be hard to know how these technologies can be applied to increase national security. We're not just going to turn these machines on and start catching terrorists." REAL ID will not assure greater safety since terrorists will either avoid or duplicate a REAL ID compliant drivers' license, although a correctly operating biometric system would certainly increase the difficulty of faking or forging a license.
Despite the government's assurances about the "certain" safety benefits of REAL ID, no government or company can create a foolproof, perfectly secure system. A person who breaks the law or who desires to wreak havoc on American soil will find a loophole with which to avoid the requirements of REAL ID. One needs only consider that driver's licenses on the black market will continue to be readily available.

Further, the safety of law abiding citizens will be compromised as their identities are stolen, stored and made accessible to thieves around the globe. Some people reject this idea because they hope that the government will be able to protect their identity once it has all of a person's information. The simple faith implicit in this idea is widely misplaced, however. As proof, consider that in 2007, a Globe and Mail report noted, "A security flaw in Passport Canada's website has allowed easy access to the personal information - including social insurance numbers, dates of birth and driver's license numbers - of people applying for new passports."

A breach of security in Great Britain last December resulted in the loss of approximately 25 million individual records. In my state of Pennsylvania, a security breach which occurred two years ago at a Driver's License Center resulted in over 11,000 records being compromised. Such security breaches highlight significant personal dangers to law abiding citizens and prove that the only secure data is uncollected data.

Finally, REAL ID does not assure safety because biometric technology itself does not work predictably. At this point in time, the technology we are discussing does not work well; hence REAL ID and facial recognition biometrics can not ensure safety. As a result, no one has yet been successfully prosecuted via facial biometrics. The opportunity for false identification and therefore being, "guilty before proven innocent" is great. For example, the Tampa, Florida police force scrapped a facial recognition system in 2003 because, according to a spokesman, "We never identified, were alerted to, or caught any criminal. It didn't work." While on its face, the concept of REAL ID seems like it would increase security, it does not. A Privacy International Study conducted in 2004 found "Of the 25 countries that have been most adversely affected by terrorism since 1986, eighty percent have national identity cards, one third of which incorporate biometrics. This research was unable to uncover any instance where the presence of an identity card system in those countries was seen as a significant deterrent to terrorist activity." The simple truth is that REAL ID cannot stop crime.

In summary, we have seen that REAL ID threatens Constitutional rights, national and state sovereignty, and the safety of our people. The enrollment of American citizens into an international biometric system of identification and tracking constitutes the heart of the REAL ID issue. A secure driver's license is not the ultimate goal or certainly the ultimate result of the REAL ID Act.
And it is unfortunately clear that the ultimate purpose is government tracking and economic control through enhanced knowledge and surveillance through biometric identification and tracking.
This being established, it is clear that this aggressive effort of the federal government, working hand-in-hand with private commercial interests, must be opposed on every level. While Congress must move to quickly repeal the passage of the REAL ID Act, the states provide an ideal position from which to fight this encroachment by the federal government. The responsibility for the security and privacy of our own generation and the generations to come, however, rests upon our shoulders.

The next action to be taken involves the following three steps.
First, Congress must immediately repeal the REAL ID Act and resist any effort to pass anything remotely similar. Secondly, individual states which have not passed legislation preventing implementation of any provision of REAL ID, particularly the biometric portion, must do so without delay. As has been stressed throughout this article, biometrics is the core provision of REAL ID; consequently, the states must move to protect their citizens' biometric data immediately. This step is critical because the vast majority of statutory law did not envision the breadth of individually identifiable data that could be gleaned by rapidly advancing technology. Further, because L-1 Identity Solutions holds a virtual monopoly as contractor for state DMVs, they could use their position to coerce the states into implementing all of DHS's wishes. This scenario further endangers state's rights.

Source: www.newswithviews.com/guest_opinion/guest128.htm

Genocide Treaty via Attrition

1. a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength: Our club has had a high rate of attrition because so many members have moved away.
2. a wearing down or weakening of resistance, especially as a result of continuous pressure or harassment: The enemy surrounded the town and conducted a war of attrition.
3. a gradual reduction in work force without firing of personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced.

https://www.StopTheCrime.net

War of Attrition
A war in which forces do not confront each other in direct combat with the full strength of their teams, but instead aim to wear each other down over a period of time using tactics such as guerilla warfare, sabotage and other dishonourable means of combat.
The war is a war which will not necessarily be won by superior skill but by patience and skillful resource management.

Attrition warfare is a military strategy consisting of belligerent attempts to win a war by wearing down the enemy to the point of collapse through continuous losses in personnel and materiel. The war will usually be won by the side with greater such resources.[1] The word attrition comes from the Latin root atterere to rub against, similar to the "grinding down" of the opponent's forces in attrition warfare.[2]

Strategic Considerations
Military theorists and strategists have viewed attrition warfare as something to be avoided. In the sense that attrition warfare represents an attempt to grind down an opponent through superior numbers, it represents the opposite of the usual principles of war in which one attempts to achieve decisive victories by using minimal necessary resources and in minimal amount of time, through manoeuvre, concentration of force, surprise, and the like.
On the other hand, a side that perceives itself to be at a marked disadvantage in manoeuvre warfare or unit tactics may deliberately seek out attrition warfare to neutralize its opponent's advantages. If the sides are nearly evenly matched, the outcome of a war of attrition is likely to be a Pyrrhic victory.

The difference between war of attrition and other forms of war is somewhat artificial since war always contains an element of attrition. One can be said to pursue a strategy of attrition if one makes it the main goal to cause gradual attrition to the opponent eventually amounting to unacceptable or unsustainable levels for the opponent while limiting one's own gradual losses to acceptable and sustainable levels. That should be seen as opposed to other main goals such as the conquest of some resource or territory or an attempt to cause the enemy great losses in a single stroke (such as by encirclement and capture).
Historically, attritional methods are tried only as a last resort, when other methods have failed or are obviously not feasible. Typically, when attritional methods have worn down the enemy sufficiently to make other methods feasible, attritional methods are abandoned in favor of other strategies. In World War I, improvements in firepower but not communications and mobility forced military commanders to rely on attrition, with terrible casualties.

Attritional methods are in themselves usually sufficient to cause a nation to give up a nonvital ambition, but other methods are generally necessary to achieve unconditional surrender.
CONTINUE...

Also See: Losing the War of Attrition: Mobility, Chronic Decline, and Infrastructure

ICLEI, the ‘International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives,’ was founded in 1990. It is the result of the meeting of 43 countries at the United Nations in New York. While this international body plans its ‘sustainable development’ ruse, your property rights are under threat. It is part of the “Earth Summit,” Agenda 21, Maurice Strong, United Nations conglomerate.

Still known as ICLEI, it changed its name to “Local Governments for Sustainability.” It in essence imposes soft law on otherwise sovereign lands. However, its web is larger than you may know. Is your city or locality a member of ICLEI? Check the list below to find out…. If you see your city, you may want to attend your next council meeting to find out why…

“Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.” Harvey Ruvin, Vice Chairman, ICLEI. The Wildlands Project

Source: ICLEI[ UPDATE : August 20, 2013
This page was originally published June 16, 2012. The ‘source’ link above is no longer active. It appears to be archived HERE…..with one major caveat….the United States cities are no longer listed! If you can prove to the contrary, please provide where to get them, and I will update here. Otherwise, HERE is the link to ‘member list’ on the ICLEI website. When you click on the United States, it will only say how many cities are members per state, but not actually list the members. Take that for what it’s worth. -T ]

Argentina

• Municipality of Buenos Aires
• Municipality of La Plata

Armenia

• Municipality of Hrazdan

Australia

• Adelaide City Council
• Alice Springs Town Council
• Ashfield Municipal Council
  
• Australian Capital Territory Government
• Australian Local Government Association
• Ballarat City Council
  
• Bass Coast Shire Council
• Bega Valley Shire Council
  
• Benalla Rural City Council
• Brisbane City Council
• Burwood Council
• Cairns Regional Council
• Cardinia Shire Council
• City of Boroondara
• City of Brimbank
• City of Bunbury
• City of Burnside
• City of Geraldton-Greenough
• City of Greater Geelong
• City of Greater Geralton
• City of Joondalup
• City of Kingston
• City of Lake Macquarie
• City of Mandurah
• City of Marion
• City of Melbourne
• City of Melville
• City of Norwood Payneham & St Peters
• City of Onkaparinga
• City of Perth
• City of Port Phillip
• City of South Perth
• City of Stirling
• City of Subiaco
• City of Sydney
• City of Vincent
• City of West Torrens
• City of Whitehorse
• City of Whittlesea
• City of Wodonga
• City of Yarra
• Clarence Valley Council
• Coffs Harbour City Council
• Colac Otway Shire Council
• Devonport City Council
• District Council of Mount Barker
• District Council of the Copper Coast
• East Gippsland Shire Council
• Frankston City Council
• Fraser Coast Regional Council
• Gold Coast City Council
• Gosford City Council
• Hobsons Bay City Shire Council
• Holroyd City Council
• Hunter’s Hill Council
• Kogarah Council
• Leichhardt Municipal Council
• Liverpool City Council
• Manningham City Council
• Maroondah City Council
• Mike Galea (EnvironArc Pty Ltd)
• Mildura Rural City Council
• Moira Shire Council
• Moorabool Shire Council
• Mornington Peninsula Shire
• Mosman Municipal Council
• Murrindindi Shire Council
• North Sydney Council
• Palerang Council
• Parramatta City Council
• Penrith City Council
• Richmond Valley Council
• Rural City of Wangaratta
• Shire of Augusta-Margaret River
• Shire of Dardanup
• Snowy River Shire Council
• Strathfield Municipal Council
• Sunshine Coast Regional Council
• Swan Hill Rural City Council
• The Barossa Council
• The City of Unley
• The Shire of Peppermint Grove
• Toowoomba City Council
• Town of Kwinana
• Townsville City Council
• Warrnambool City Council
• Wyndham City Council

Austria

• Magistrat der Stadt Linz
• Stadt Innsbruck
• Umweltverband Vorarlberg

Bangladesh

• Barisal City
• Rajshahi City Corporation
• City of Dhaka

Belgium

• Région de Bruxelles-Capitale
• Van Hoof, Veronique (Associate Member)

Bhutan

• Phuentsholing City Corporation
• Thimphu City Corporation

Bolivia

• Municipality of Santisima Trinidad

Botswana

• Botswana Association of Local Authorities

Brazil

• Alta Floresta
• Apuí
• Bauru
• Belo Horizonte
• Betim
• City Council of Lucas do Rio Verde
• Contagem
• Curitiba
• Goiânia
• Guarulhos
• Itu
• Manaus
• Mariana
• Porto Alegre
• Rio de Janeiro
• Santa Maria
• Santo André
• São Carlos
• São Paulo (Municipality)
• Sorocaba
• State of Minas Gerais (Associate Member)
• State of São Paulo (Associate Member)
• Tailândia
• Volta Redonda

Bulgaria

• Municipality of Burgas

Burkina Faso
Sabce Municipality
Cameroon

• City of Yokadouma
• Fongo-Tongo Municipality, Cameroon
• Menji Municipality

Canada

• Annapolis Royal
• Campbell River
• City of Calgary
• City of Edmonton
• City of Greater Sudbury
• City of Guelph
• City of Hamilton
• City of Kitchener
• City of Mississauga
• City of Regina
• City of Toronto
• City of Vancouver
• Dawson Creek
• Durham Region
• Essex
• Federation of Canadian Municipalities
• Fort St. John
• Halton Hills
• Iqaluit
• Leduc
• Marlaina Elliot (Associate Member)
• Metro Vancouver
• Red Deer
• Region of York
• Sustainable Cities International (Associate Member)
• The Blue Mountains
• The Corporation of Delta
• Town of Aurora
• Town of Oakville
• Ville de Montréal

Chile

• Municipality of Chillan
• Municipality of Ñuñoa
• Municipality of Tome

China

• Shenyang, China

Chinese Taipei

• Chia-Yi County
• Kaohsiung
• Pingtung County
• Taichung City
• Tainan
• Taipei City
• New Taipei City Government
• Taiwan Environmental Action Network (Associate Member)
• Taoyuan County
• Yilan County Government
• Yunlin County Government

Colombia

• Municipality of Bogotá
• Municipality of Manizales

Croatia

• City of Koprivnica
• City of Zagreb
• Primorsko-goranska County

Cyprus

• Nicosia Turkish Cypriote Community

Czech Republic

• City of Krnov

Denmark

• Albertslund Kommune
• Ballerup Kommune
• City of Aalborg
• City of Copenhagen
• Kolding Kommune
• National Procurement Ltd.- Denmark (Associate Member)

Equador

• Municipality of Quito

Estonia

• City of Tartu

Ethiopia

• Addis Ababa City Government

Finland

• Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities
• City of Espoo
• City of Hämeenlinna
• City of Helsinki
• City of Jyväskylä
• City of Kouvola
• City of Kuopio
• City of Lahti
• City of Oulu
• City of Pori
• City of Riihimäki
• City of Tampere
• City of Turku
• City of Vantaa
• Mariehamns Stad
• Town of Jakobstad

France

• Communauté Urbaine de Dunkerque
• Communauté Urbaine du Grand Nancy
• Communauté Urbaine de Strasbourg
• Lille Métropole Communauté Urbaine
• Montpellier
• Nantes Métropole
• Rhone-Alpes Regional Council
• Ville d’Angers
• Ville de Bordeaux
• Ville de Cluses
• Ville de Coudekerque-Branche
• Ville de Grande-Synthe
• Ville d’Hondschoote
• Ville de Saint-Denis
• Ville de Sanary-sur-Mer

Georgia

• City of Tbilisi

Germany

• Berlin
• Freie Hansestadt Bremen
• Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg
• Landeshauptstadt Dresden
• Landeshauptstadt Hannover
• Landkreis Nordhausen
• Stadt Augsburg
• Stadt Beckum
• Stadt Bietigheim-Bissingen
• Stadt Bonn
• Stadt Bottrop
• Stadt Freiburg
• Stadt Heidelberg
• Stadt Kaufbeuren
• Stadt Ludwigsburg
• Stadt Münster
• Stadt Nordhausen
• Stadt Oranienburg
• Stadt Regensburg
• Stadt Viernheim
• Stadt Wedel

Ghana

• National Association of Local Authorities of Ghana (NALAG)

Greece

• Coalition of 21 Municipalities of N.E. Athens
• Municipality of Amaroussion
• Municipality of Trikala

Hungary

• Center for Environmental Studies Foundation (Associate Member)
• City of Miskolc
• Municipality of Tatabánya

Iceland

• City of Reykjavik

India

• Abhijit Sarkar (Associate Member)
• Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation
• All India Institute of Local Self Governance
• Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation
• Bhopal Municipal Corporation
• Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation
• Chandrapur Municipal Council
• CMAG (Associate Member)
• Coimbatore Municipal Corporation
• Emaar MGF (Associate Member)
• Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
• Greater Mumbai Municipal Corporation
• Guntur Municipal Corporation
• Gurgaon Municipal Corporation
• Guwahati Municipal Corporation
• Gwalior Municipal Corporation
• Howrah Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Associate Member)
• Howrah Municipal Corporation
• Jabalpur Municipal Corporation
• Jamnagar Municipal Corporation
• Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation
• Kolkata Municipal Corporation
• Kolhapur Municipal Corporation
• Kumar Vedulla (Associate Member)
• Madurai Municipal Corporation
• Manish Vaidya (Associate Member)
• Municipal Corporation of Delhi
• Munipality of Tenali
• Mysore Municipal Corporation
• Nagpur Municipal Corporation
• National Institute of Urban Affairs (Associate Member)
• Parsvnath Developers Ltd (Associate Member)
• Pune Municipal Corporation
• Rajahmundry Municipal Corporation
• Rajkot Municipal Corporation
• Shimla Municipal Corporation
• Surat Municipal Corporation
• Tenali Municipality
• Thane Municipal Corporation
• Tiruchirappalli Municipal Corporation
• Titupati Municipal Corporation
• Vadodara Municipal Corporation
• Vijayawada Municipal Corporation
• Vishakhapatnam Municipal Corporation

Indonesia

• Balikpapan, Indonesia
• Bogor, Indonesia
• Cilegon, Indonesia
• Medan, Indonesia
• Semarang, Indonesia
• Surabaya, Indonesia
• Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Ireland

• Dublin City Council

Israel

• Jerusalem
• Municipality of Raanana

Italy

• Agenzia InnovA21 per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile (Associate Member)
• Cernusco sul Naviglio local government
• Comune di Ancona
• Comune di Bologna
• Comune di Cesena
• Comune di Livorno
• Comune di Roma
• Comune di Rosignano Marittimo
• Comune di Vignola
• Coordinamento Agende 21 Locali Italiane
• Provincia di Rimini
• Provincia di Siena

Japan

• Aichi Prefecture
• Fujisawa City
• Hiroshima City
• Iida City
• Itabashi City
• Kanagawa Prefecture
• Kawasaki City
• Kitakyushu City
• Kobe City
• Kumamoto City
• Kyoto City
• Musashino City
• Nagoya City
• Okayama City
• Sapporo City
• Sendai City
• Sumida City
• Tokubetsukukyogikai (Council of Wards in Tokyo)
• Tokyo Metropolitan Government
• Ube City
• Yamanashi Prefecture

Kenya

• Municipal Council of Nakuru
• Municipal Council of Vihiga, Kenya

Latvia

• City of Jurmala
• Riga City Council

Maldives

• City of Male

Mauritius

• Moka Flacq District Council
• Municipal Council of Port Louis
• Municipal Council of Curepipe
• Pamplemousses and Riviere du Rempart District Council

Mexico

• Aguascalientes
• Association of Municipalities of Mexico (AMMAC) (Associate Member)
• Centro (Villahermosa)
• Chihuahua
• Ciudad Valles
• Corregidora
• Cuautitlán Izcalli
• Distrito Federal (Mexico City)
• Ecatepec de Morelos
• Estado de Sonora
• Gobierno del Estado de Durango
• Gobierno del Estado de Oaxaca
• Gobierno del Estado de Quetaro de Arteaga
• Gobierno del Estado de Michoacan de Ocampo
• Ixtapa Zihuatanejo
• Léon de los Aldama
• Miguel Hidalgo
• Municipio de Alvarado
• Municipio de Benito Juarez – Cancun
• Municipio del Boca del Rio
• Municipio de Culiacón
• Municipio de Gomez Palacio
• Municipio de Heroica Nogales
• Municipio de Lerdo
• Municipio de Medellin
• Municipio de Monterrey
• Municipio de Oaxaca de Juarez
• Municipio de Saltillo
• Municipio de Tamuin
• Municipio de Toluca de Lerdo
• Municipio de Xalapa
• Puebla
• Querétaro
• San Miguel de Allende
• San Nicolás de los Garza
• Solidaridad (Playa del Carmen)
• Veracruz (Associate Member)
• Veracruz
• Zacatecas (Associate Member)

Mozambique

• Lichinga City Municipality

Namibia

• Mariental Municipality
• Municipality of Swakopmund
• Municipality of Walvis Bay
• City of Windhoek

Nepal

• Hetauda Municipality
• Kathmandu Metropolitan City
• Lalitpur Sub Metropolitan City Office
• Municipal Association of Nepal
• Pokhara Sub Metropolitan city
• RADP (Associate Member)

Netherlands

• City of Amsterdam
• City of Rotterdam
• Gemeente Haarlem
• Gemeente Tilburg
• VNG-Vereniging van Nederlandse Gemeenten

New Zealand

• Christchurch City Council
• Dunedin City Council
• Hamilton City Council
• Kaikoura District Council
• Kapiti Coast District Council
• New Plymouth District Council
• Palmerston North City Council
• Porirua City Council
• Rodney District Council
• South Wairarapa District Council
• Waikato Regional Council
• Waitakere City Council

Nigeria

• Ido Local Government
• Isoko South Local Government
• Lagos State Government

Norway

• Arendal Kommune
• City of Bergen
• City of Oslo
• Drammen Kommune
• Kristiansand Kommune
• KS-Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities
• Lillehammer Kommune
• Lørenskog kommune
• Porsgrunn kommune
• Stavanger kommune
• Stiftelsen Idébanken (Associate Member)
• Tingvoll Kommune

Palestianian Autonomous Territories

• Municipality of Jabalia

Peru

• Municipality of Ate
• Municipality of Cajamarca

Philippines

• Baguio City, Philippines
• Batangas City, Philippines
• Bohol Province, Philippines
• Municipality of Calbiga, Philippines
• Dagupan City, Philippines
• General Santos City, Philippines
• Iloilo City, Philippines
• League of Cities of the Philippines
• Linamon, Lanao del Norte, Philippines
• Lubang Municipality
• Makati City, Philippines
• Municipality of Dumangas, Iloilo
• Municipality of Tublay, Benguet
• Muntinlupa City, Philippines
• Naga City, Philippines
• Puerto Princesa City, Philippines
• Quezon City, Philippines
• Samar Province, Philippines
• San Fernando City, La Union, Philippines
• Municipality of San Francisco Cebu, Philippines
• Science City of Munoz, Phillipines
• Tubigon, Philippines
• Tuguegarao City, Philippines

Poland

• City of Katowice

Portugal

• Câmara Municipal de Agueda
• Câmara Municipal de Cascais
• Câmara Municipal de Oeiras
• Câmara Municipal de Torres Vedras
• Câmara Municipal de Almada
• Junta de Freguesia de Agualva

Republic of Korea

• Ansan City
• Boryeong City
• Buchen City
• Busan Metropolitan City
• Buyeo County
• Changwon City
• ChejuMBC (Associate Member)
• Cheongyang County Government
• Cho, Jung Woong (Associate Member)
• Chungcheongnam Province
• Daegu Metropolitan City
• DaeKyung Engineering Co. (Associate Member)
• Damyang County
• Dongseo Turism Inc. (Associate Member)
• Gangwon Province
• Gapyeong County
• Geumsan County
• Gumi City
• Gwacheon City
• Gwangju Metropolitan City
• Gyeonggi Province
• Gyeongsangnam Province
• Hadong County
• Hallailbo (Associate Member)
• HanmiParsons Co (Associate Member)
• Hoengseong Gun
• Hwaseong City
• Hyun, Hak Soon (Associate Member)
• Incheon Metropolitan City
• Issac Holdings (Associate Member)
• Jeju Academic Society of Tourisom (Associate Member)
• Jeju Biodiversity Research Institute (Associate Member)
• Jeju City
• Jeju Development Institution (Associate Member)
• Jeju Gymnyeong Mazepark (Associate Member)
• Jeju Logistic Transport Company (Associate Member)
• Jeju Special Self-Governing Province
• Jeongseon Gun
• Jeonju City
• Kim, Wang Sik (Associate Member)
• Namyangju City
• National Environment Technology Coperation (Associate Member)
• Oreum Partners Co. (Associate Member)
• Prof. OH Youn-keun (Associate Member)
• Pyeongchang Gun
• Sahara
• Seocheon County
• Seogwipo City
• Seongnam City
• Seo Min Hye (Associate Member)
• Seoul Metropolitan City
• Songpa-gu
• Suncheon City
• Suwon City
• Ulsan Metropolitan City
• Wonju City
• Yangpyeong Gun
• Yeosu City
• Yong-in City

Romania

• City of Baia Mare
• City of Giurgiu
• Municipality of Odorheiu Secuiesc
• Municipality of Orastie
• Municipality of Pitesti

Russia

• Selenyi Kirov (Associate Member)

Rwanda

• RALGA

Senegal

• Municipality of Nioro du Rip

Serbia

• CEDEF-Central European Development Forum (Associate Member)
• Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities of Serbia

South Africa

• Beaufort West City
• Buffalo City Municipality
• Cape Winelands District Municipality
• Capricorn District Municipality
• City of Cape Town
• City of Johannesburg
• City of Tshwane
• Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality
• eThekwini Municipality
• Mangaung Municipality
• Motheo District Municipality
• Nelson, Mandela Metro
• North- West University, Centre for Environmental Management (Potchefstroon campus)
• Pauline Froschauer (Associate Member)
• SALGA
• Sedibeng Municipality
• Sol Plaatje Municipality
• Steve Tshwete Local Municipality
• uMgungundlovu District Municipality
• Tlokwe City Council
• Water Research Commission (Associate Member)

Spain

• Ajuntament de Barcelona
• Ajuntament de Calvià
• Ajuntament de Lloret de Mar
• Ajuntament de Reus
• Ayuntamiento del Real Sitio de San Ildefonso
• Ayuntamiento de Rivas-Vaciamadrid
• Ayuntamiento de San Sebastián de La Gomera
• Ayuntamiento de Santa Úrsula
• Ayuntamiento de Tarragona
• Ayuntamiento de Teulada
• Ayuntamiento de Zaragoza
• Concello de Culleredo
• Diputació de Barcelona
• Las Rozas de Madrid
• Mancomunidad Intermunicipal del Sureste de Gran Canaria
• Red de Municipios Valencianos hacia la Sostenibilidad
• Red Navarra de Entidades Locales hacia la Sostenibilidad
• UDALSAREA 21 – Red Vasca de Municipios hacia la Sostenibilidad
• Vitoria Gasteiz

Sri Lanka

• Kandy Municipal Council
• Kurunegala Municipal Corporation
• Matale Municipal Council

Sweden

• City of Göteborg
• City of Malmö
• City of Stockholm
• City of Sundsvall
• Haninge
• Helsingborgs Stad
• Laholms kommun
• Linköpings kommun
• Miljöstyrningsrådet (Associate Member)
• Municipality of Växjö
• Örebro kommun
• TCO Development (Associate Member)
• Ystad

Switzerland

• IGÖB-Interessengemeinschaft ökologische Beschaffung (Associate Member)
• Kanton Basel-Stadt
• Stadt Zürich
• Ville de Genève

Tanzania

• Arusha Municipal Council
• Dar es Salaam
• Geita District Council
• Moshi Municipal Council

Thailand

• Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Thailand
• Muangklang, Thailand
• Phuket, Thailand

Turkey

• SatekSolar (Associate Member)
• Sisli Belediyesi
• Kartal
• Metropolitan Municipality of Konya

Uganda

• Entebbe
• Jinja Municipal Council
• Kasese District Local Government,Uganda

Ukraine

• City of Odessa
• Municipality of Nikolaev

United Kingdom

• Birmingham City Council
• Bristol City Council
• City of Glasgow
• Craigavon Borough Council
• Greater London Authority
• Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council
• Leicester City Council
• Newcastle City Council
• Royal Haskoning (Associate Member)
• Woking Borough Council

Uruguay

• Municipality of Montevideo

United States of America

• Abingdon, VA
• Acton, MA
• Alachua County, FL
• Albany, CA
• Albany, NY
• Alexandria, VA
• Algonquin, IL
• Allegheny County, PA
• Alliance, OH
• American Canyon, CA
• Amherst, MA
• Ann Arbor, MI
• Antioch, CA
• Arcata, CA
• Arlington County, VA
• Arroyo Grande, CA
• Arvada, CO
• Ashland, OR
• Aspen, CO
• Atascadero, CA
• Athens-Clarke County, GA
• Athens, OH
• Atlanta, GA
• Auburn, MA
• Auburn, WA
• Austin, TX
• Babylon, NY
• Bainbridge Island, WA
• Beaverton, OR
• Bedford, NY
• Belfast, ME
• Bellevue, WA
• Bellingham, WA
• Belmar, NJ
• Belmont, MA
• Belvedere, CA
• Benicia, CA
• Berea, KY
• Berkeley, CA
• Beverly Hills, CA
• Binghamton, NY
• Birmingham, AL
• Blacksburg, VA
• Blaine County, ID
• Bloomington, IN
• Blue Earth County, MN
• Boston, MA
• Bothell, WA
• Bowie, MD
• Boynton Beach, FL
• Bozeman, MT
• Branford, CT
• Brattleboro, VT
• Brenkeridge Town, CO
• Bridgeport, CT
• Brighton, NY
• Brookfield, IL
• Brookhaven, NY
• Brookline, MA
• Broward County, FL
• Burlingame, CA
• Burlington, VT
• Cambridge, MA
• Carbondale, CO
• Carpinteria, CA
• Carrboro, NC
• Cary, NC
• Cayuga County, NY
• Champaign, IL
• Chandler, AZ
• Chapel Hill, NC
• Charleston, SC
• Charlotte, NC
• Charlottesville, VA
• Chatham County, GA
• Chatham, NY
• Chattanooga, TN
• Chelmsford, MA
• Chevy Chase, MD
• Chicago, IL
• Chula Vista, CA
• Cimarron, NM
• Cincinnati, OH
• Clackamas County, OR
• Clallam County, WA
• Clark County, NV
• Clarkstown, NY
• Clayton, MO
• Cleveland, OH
• Clifton, NJ
• Cloverdale, CA
• Coconut Creek, MD
• College Park, MD
• Collier County, FL
• Columbia, SC
• Commerce City, MD
• Concord, CA
• Concord, MA
• Cookeville, TN
• Cooperstown, NY
• Coppell, TX
• Cortlandt, NY
• Corvallis, OR
• Covina, CA
• Coupeville, WA
• Creve Coeur, MO
• Croton on Hudson, NY
• Culver City, CA
• Cupertino, CA
• Cutler Bay, FL
• Dallas, TX
• Davie, FL
• Davis, CA
• Dearborn, MI
• Decatur, GA
• Decorah, IA
• Dedham, MA
• Del Mar, CA
• Delray Beach, FL
• Denton, TX
• Denver, CO
• Devens, MA
• DeWitt, NY
• Dixon, CA
• Dobbs Ferry, NY
• Dryden, NY
• Duarte, CA
• Dublin, CA
• Dubuque, IA
• Duluth, MN
• Dumfries, VA
• Durango, CO
• Durham, NC
• East Palo Alto, CA
• Eastchester, NY
• Eatontown, NJ
• Edina, MN
• Edinburg, TX
• Edmonds, WA
• Edwardsville, IL
• El Cerrito, CA
• El Paso, TX
• Elmhurst, IL
• Emeryville, CA
• Encinitas, CA
• Essex, CT
• Eugene, OR
• Everett, WA
• Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK
• Fairfax, CA
• Fairfield, IA
• Fairfield, CA
• Fairmont, WV
• Falls Church, VA
• Falls, PA
• Falmouth, ME
• Fayetteville, AR
• Ferndale, MI
• Fitchburg, WI
• Flagstaff, AZ
• Flint, MI
• Fort Collins, CO
• Fort Lauderdale, FL
• Foster City, CA
• Frankfort, KY
• Franklin, TN
• Fremont, CA
• Fullerton, CA
• Gainesville, FL
• Gaithersburg, MD
• Geneva, NY
• Glendale, CA
• Golden Valley, MN
• Golden, CO
• Goodyear, AZ
• Grand Forks, ND
• Grand Rapids, MI
• Grapevine, TX
• Greenbelt, MD
• Greenburgh, NY
• Greenville, SC
• Groton, CT
• Gunnison County, CO
• Hailey, ID
• Hamilton County, TN
• Hamilton, NJ
• Harrisonburg, VA
• Hastings on Hudson, NY
• Haverford, PA
• Hawaii County, HI
• Hayward, CA
• Helena, MT
• Henderson, NV
• Hennepin County, MN
• Hermosa Beach, CA
• Hillsboro, OR
• Hillsborough, CA
• Hingham, MA
• Homer, AK
• Houston, TX
• Howard County, MD
• Howard, WI
• Hunter, NY
• Huntsville, AL
• Iowa City, IA
• Ipswich, MA
• Irvine, CA
• Irving, TX
• Island County, WA
• Issaquah, WA
• Ithaca (City), NY
• Ithaca (Town), NY
• James City County, VA
• Johnson County, IA
• Johnson County, KS
• Juneau, AK
• Kansas City, MO
• Keene, NH
• Key West, FL
• King County, WA
• Kingston, MA
• Kingston, NY
• Kirkland, WA
• Kirkwood, MO
• Knoxville, TN
• La Grange Park, IL
• La Mirada, CA
• La Plata County, CO
• Lacey, WA
• Lafayette, CA
• Laguna Vista, TX
• Lake Forest, IL
• Lake Oswego, OR
• Lake Worth, FL
• Lakewood, CA
• Larchmont, NY
• Larkspur, CA
• Las Cruces, NM
• Las Vegas, NV
• Lawrence, KS
• Lee County, FL
• Lee’s Summit, MO
• Leon County, FL
• Lewes, DE
• Lexington-Fayette County, KY
• Lincoln City, OR
• Livermore, CA
• Lomita, CA
• Los Alamos County, NM
• Los Altos, CA
• Los Altos Hills Town, CA
• Los Angeles County, CA
• Los Gatos, CA
• Loveland, CO
• Lower Southampton, PA
• Lynchburg, VA
• Lynnwood, WA
• Maitland, FL
• Madison, WI
• Madison County, NY
• Mamaroneck (Town), NY
• Mamaroneck (Village), NY
• Manitou Springs, CO
• Mankato, MN
• Maplewood, NJ
• Marathon, FL
• Marlboro, NJ
• Marshfield, MA
• Marshfield, WI
• Martinez, CA
• McMinnville, OR
• Meadville, PA
• Medford, MA
• Menlo Park, CA
• Merced, CA
• Mercer Island, WA
• Miami Gardens, FL
• Miami, FL
• Miami-Dade County, FL
• Middletown, PA
• Mill Valley, CA
• Millbrae, CA
• Milton, MA
• Milwaukee, WI
• Milwaukie, OR
• Minneapolis, MN
• Mission, KS
• Missoula, MT
• Monmouth County, NJ
• Monroe County, FL
• Monterey, CA
• Montgomery, AL
• Montgomery Township, PA
• Moorpark, CA
• Moraga, CA
• Mount Kisco, NY
• Mountain View, CA
• Mt. Lebanon, PA
• Muncie, IN
• Murrieta, CA
• Nantucket, MA
• Napa County, CA
• Napa, CA
• Nashua, NH
• Nashville, TN
• Natick, MA
• Nether Providence, PA
• New Castle, NY
• New Haven, CT
• New London, CT
• New Orleans, LA
• New Paltz (Town), NY
• New Rochelle, NY
• New York, NY
• Newark, CA
• Newark, NJ
• North Andover, MA
• North Castle, NY
• North Hempstead, NY
• North Las Vegas, NV
• North Liberty, IA
• North Little Rock, AR
• North Miami, FL
• Northampton, MA
• Northbrook, IL
• Novato, CA
• Oak Harbor, WA
• Oak Park, IL
• Oak Ridge, TN
• Oakdale, MN
• Oakland, CA
• Oakley, CA
• Oberlin, OH
• Olympia, WA
• Omaha, NE
• Onondaga County, NY
• Orange County, FL
• Orange County, NC
• Orangetown, NY
• Orinda, CA
• Orlando, FL
• Oshkosh, WI
• Ossining (Town), NY
• Ossining (Village), NY
• Oswego, IL
• Oswego County, NY
• Pacifica, CA
• Palm Bay, FL
• Palm Beach County, FL
• Palm Springs, CA
• Palmdale, CA
• Palo Alto, CA
• Park City, UT
• Passaic County, NJ
• Peekskill, NY
• Penn Hills, PA
• Peoria, AZ
• Philadelphia, PA
• Phoenix, AZ
• Pinecrest, FL
• Pittsburg, CA
• Plantation, FL
• Port Townsend, WA
• Portland, ME
• Portland, OR
• Portola Valley, CA
• Portsmouth, NH
• Pound Ridge, NY
• Prairie Village, KS
• Prince George’s County, MD
• Pulaski County, AR
• Quincy, MA
• Raleigh, NC
• Red Hook, NY
• Redmond, WA
• Redwood City, CA
• Renton, WA
• Richardson, TX
• Richmond, VA
• Richmond Heights, MO
• Ridgefield, CT
• Riverside, CA
• Riverside, MO
• Roanoke County, VA
• Roanoke, VA
• Rochester, MN
• Rochester, NY
• Rock Island, IL
• Rockford, IL
• Rockville, MD
• Rolling Hills Estates, CA
• Rosendale, NY
• Roseville, MN
• Ross, CA
• Rye, NY
• Sacramento County, CA
• Saint George, UT
• Saint Louis County, MO
• Saint Louis, MO
• Saint Paul, MN
• Salem, MA
• Salinas, CA
• Salisbury, MD
• Salt Lake City, UT
• San Anselmo, CA
• San Antonio, TX
• San Bruno, CA
• San Buenaventura (Ventura), CA
• San Carlos, CA
• San Clemente, CA
• San Diego, CA
• San Francisco, CA
• San Joaquin, CA
• San Jose, CA
• San Leandro, CA
• San Luis Obispo, CA
• San Marcos, TX
• San Mateo County, CA
• San Mateo, CA
• San Miguel County, CO
• San Pablo, CA
• Santa Ana, CA
• Santa Barbara County, CA
• Santa Barbara, CA
• Santa Clara, CA
• Santa Clara County, CA
• Santa Clarita, CA
• Santa Cruz, CA
• Santa Fe, NM
• Santa Monica, CA
• Santa Rosa, CA
• Santee, CA
• Sarasota, FL
• Saratoga Springs, NY
• Saugerties, NY
• Savannah, GA
• Seaside, CA
• SeaTac, WA
• Seattle, WA
• Schenectady County, NY
• Shelby County, TN
• Shoreline, WA
• Shueyville, IA
• Sierra Madre, CA
• Signal Mountain, TN
• Silver City, NM
• Sioux Falls, SD
• Sitka, AK
• Skagit County, WA
• Skaneateles Village, NY
• Snohomish County, WA
• Solana Beach, CA
• Solano County, CA
• Somers, NY
• Somerset County, NJ
• Sonoma City, CA
• Sonoma County, CA
• South Bend, IN
• South Daytona, FL
• Southampton Village, NY
• South Gate, CA
• South Miami, FL
• South Padre Island, TX
• South Portland, ME
• Spartanburg, SC
• Spokane, WA
• Springfield, IL
• St. Lawrence County, NY
• Stamford, CT
• Staunton, VA
• Sullivan County, NY
• Summit County, UT
• Syracuse, NY
• Tacoma, WA
• Takoma Park, MD
• Tallahassee, FL
• Tamarac, FL
• Taos, NM
• Tarrytown, NY
• Temecula, CA
• Tempe, AZ
• Tewksbury, MA
• Thurston County, WA
• Tiburon, CA
• Tompkins County, NY
• Town and Country, MO
• Tracy, CA
• Traverse City, MI
• Tuckahoe, NY
• Tucson, AZ
• Tulsa, OK
• Tumwater, WA
• Tybee Island, GA
• Tyngsborough, MA
• Union City, CA
• University City, MO
• Urbana, IL
• Vacaville, CA
• Ventura County, CA
• Vernon,CA
• Victor, NY
• Virginia, MN
• Visalia, CA
• Vista, CA
• Warwick Township, PA
• Washington, DC
• Washoe County, NV
• Wellesley, MA
• Wellfleet Town, MA
• West Chester, PA
• West Palm Beach, FL
• West Sacramento, CA
• Wiliamson City, WV
• Willits, CA
• Wilton, CT
• Winchester, MA
• Windsor, CA
• Windsor, CT
• Winston-Salem, NC
• Wolfeboro, NH
• Woodbury
• Woodside, CA
• Woodstock, NY
• Worcester, MA
• Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS
• Yarmouth, ME
• Yonkers, NY
• York, ME
• Youngstown, OH
• Yountville, CA

Zambia

• Chongwe District Council

Zimbabwe

• Chinhoyi Municipality
• City of Bulawayo
• City of Gweru
• MDPESA – Munipal Development Partner for Eastern and Southern Africa (Associate Member)
• Municipality of Chegutu
• Mutare City Council
• Rusape Town Council
• Ruwa Local Board

Medusa relay transmitter
Following is a lawful strategy for denying consent for your electric company to install a smart meter on your home or business.
This is not legal advice. It is a common sense approach to notifying your electric company of your awareness and preferences while piercing their corporate veil at the same time.

The letter and form should be sent by certified mail to the CEO and top officers of your electric company. The fact that the private for-profit corporation that represents your public utility commission has approved the installation of smart meters, while making no assurances as to their safety, puts this issue right back into the lap of the private electric corporations. The general population has no input regarding the appointment of public utility commissioners and no legal contract with any of them. These commissioners do not work for the people.

The sample letter can be used as a template but needs to be personalized. The names of the electric company's officers and the public utility commissioners can generally be found on the internet.

The notice is a collection of indisputable facts. It is important to note that NONE of the players in the smart meter roll-out are making any claims regarding the safety of this biologically damaging device. Therefore it is THE ISSUE. In our dysfunctional legal system, consent is presumed unless specifically denied.

The notice includes the signatures of two witnesses. By signing a statement of facts, dating your signature and including two witnesses, the format meets the criteria of a legal notice. Save a copy of the letter, the notice and the certified mail labels. In the sample, there will be six letters, six notices and six certified mail labels.



SAMPLE LETTER

March 4, 2014

first and last name (do not use all caps)
address
city and state

Nicholas K. Akins, Chief Executive Officer
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
1 RIVERSIDE PLAZA
COLUMBUS, OH 43215

Dear Mr. Akins,

Recently I became aware that your corporation plans on installing unsafe smart meters on the homes and businesses of your customers. Please note: I was not a party to that decision.

Attached is my lawful notice regarding the installation of a smart meter on my home. It represents a lawful denial of consent.

I do hereby request that my denial of consent notice be filed in your records and that AEP's smart meter installers be so informed.

I DO NOT CONSENT to having a smart meter or an analog wireless transmitter placed on my home or property.

Appreciatively,



Signature
first and last name

Enclosure
cc: Robert P. Powers, AEP Executive Vice President
Brian X. Tierney, AEP Executive Vice President
David M. Feinberg, AEP Executive Vice President
Lana L. Hillebrand, AEP Senior Vice President
Dennis E. Welch, AEP Executive Vice President



Notice to agent is notice to principal
Notice to principal is notice to agent


SMART METER NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT
FILLING OUT THE NOTICE

1. Items in grey need to be personalized.
2. Corporate entities need to be in all caps.
3. The corporate (all caps) name of your electric company and your state's public utility commission can be located on Dun and Bradstreet. That information is accessible for free online.
4. At the bottom of the notice is space for your signature and the signature of two witnesses. Of course the dates need to be identical. An acceptable alternative to two witnesses would be to sign in front of a notary and have them stamp it for you.
5. Use blue ink for signatures.

Letter and Smart Meter Notice templates included



SMART METER REMOVAL
Letter and Smart Meter Notice templates for removal of smart meter

Table of Contents
SAMPLE LETTER
SMART METER NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT
SMART METER REMOVAL