By Anna Von Reitz
Take a look at the Birth Certificate issued in your NAME.
What's the first thing you notice?
It's on funny paper: hard surfaced, durable, heavy paper called "bond paper". This is your first clue that your estate has been seized upon and that bonds--- that is, promissory notes--- have been issued against your name.
The next thing that will probably catch your eye is that there are all sorts of seals and blazons and watermarks on this piece of paper. It carries all sorts of emblems from a "State of State" organization, depending on where and when you were born.
We know from our study of the history that these organizations are all foreign with respect to us, as our own American State of State organizations have been moth-balled since the Civil War.
Look at the BC issued in your name. It will show either a Territorial State of State with its name written in Upper and Lower Case like this: State of Washington, or a Municipal STATE OF STATE written in All Capitals like this: STATE OF IOWA.
All these seals and watermarks and other gee-gaws serve to identify the "Issuer" of the Birth Certificate, which is the foreign State of State Organization, not you. They are identifying your NAME as property belonging to them, which they are issuing bonds against.
The next thing you will most likely notice is that your name is spelled out in All Capital Letters, and that, most likely, other words appear in All Capital Letters.
According to the Bar Association Manual and the Government Printing Office and Federal Bureau of Engraving and Black's Law Dictionary and the Chicago Manuel of Style, the only things that can be named using All Capital Letters are: (1) Corporations or (2) Dead men's estates.
The All Capitals names are a form of Latin called "Dog Latin".
So, look at your name as it appears in All Capitals on that Birth Certificate.
Are they issuing bonds against a Dead Man's Estate? Or against a corporation?
If your name appears like this: JOHN ALLEN DOE, the bonds have been issued against your ESTATE on the presumption that you donated it to the State of State or STATE OF STATE Organization.
If your name appears like this: JOHN A. DOE, the bonds have been issued against a PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY franchise on the presumption that you donated that to the State of State or STATE OF STATE Organization.
In either case, obviously, so far as you know you didn't donate anything to any of these yahoos and you are not aware of having given them permission to bond your estate or any public transmitting utility, either. It all sounds bizzare, doesn't it?
But there is the evidence in your hand.
Now, who is the Birth Certificate Bond signed by? The Registrar. The Registrar is an Officer of the Probate Court. The appearance of their signature on "your" Birth Certificate is absolute proof that your property --- whether your ESTATE or your PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY --- has been probated and seized upon as property belonging to the State of State or STATE OF STATE that issued the Birth Certificate.
Now look at the dates on the face of the Birth Certificate. You will see your actual birthday and also a file date ---- the "birthdate". These refer to the actual event of your birth, and then, some days or weeks later, the "filing" of the paperwork to either (1) pronounce "you" dead and create your ESTATE; or (2) to create "your" PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITY.
Either way, you arrived first and have first right of recall and ownership, known as a reversionary trust interest in your own Good Name and assets.
After all, you are being misrepresented as the "donor" of all these assets and the State of State is claiming to be the beneficiary of your largesse. Having discovered this "mistake" made by your Mother when you were just a baby in your cradle, you have a right to come forward and correct it upon discovery.
What else does the Birth Certificate represent?
It is evidence of crime against you and fraud and non-disclosure against your mother.
It is evidence of attempting to contract with and establish "unconscionable contract" with an infant.
An "unconscionable contract" is a contract that you literally are not aware of. And how could a little baby be aware of a contract made "for" him when he was only a few days old, by a new Mother who was never given full disclosure about those papers she was signing at the hospital? She couldn't explain to you what she was never given to understand herself, could she?
The BC is potent evidence of crime.
Now, what are you going to do with it / about it?
The first thing you are going to do is secure two Witness Testimonies from people who have "reasonable first hand knowledge" of you and your family, who can affirm that you are "the" living man or woman whose birth occurred at such and such a time and place and to your parents, etc.
This establishes the fact that you are the presumed "Donor" of the property referenced by the BC and also establishes your standing to sue these criminals.
Next, if you follow our advice, you will complete the paperwork to return your Trade Name (also known as your Good Name and Given Name -- "John Allen Doe" in Upper and Lower Case) to the land and soil jurisdiction of your birth State.
This process explicitly demonstrates--- and recording of the action proves--- that you, the presumed Donor, are acting as a Lawful Person, not a Legal Person.
This puts you outside their jurisdiction, so they can no longer "presume" anything about you.
Next, having secured your Trade Name and having permanently domiciled it on the land and soil jurisdiction State, you will Expatriate from any presumed political status as a Territorial Citizen (like someone born in Puerto Rico) or Municipal CITIZEN (created in the Municipality of Washington, DC, for example).
And you will revoke all Prior Powers of Attorney and name your Lawful Person ---John Allen Doe, in this example--- as the only Attorney-in-Fact authorized to do business for you and your estate.
Finally, you will seize upon all the other Assumed Names and NAMES that are or could be associated with you in any regard, and all their variations and permutations and orderings and styles, and you will use a recorded Certificate of Assumed Name(s) to claim them and permanently domicile all of them on the land and soil of your State of the Union, too.
This last is a process like re-flagging a ship. Instead of "sailing" under the auspices of the British Territorial Government or the Municipal Government of Washington, DC, you are now demonstrably sailing under the auspices of Maine or California or whatever other actual land and soil jurisdiction State.
This also puts your Good Name and all the "derivative" NAMES under the Pubic Law, so that you are no longer subject to the codes and statutory laws and "public policies" of the foreign State of State or STATE OF STATE Organizations.
In sum total, at the end of this process, you have: (1) damning conclusive evidence of their wrong-doing against a baby; (2) proof of your ownership of your name and your standing; (3) proof of your political status; (4) proof that you are the only authorized Power of Attorney; (5) proof that any "vessels" related to you stand under the Public Law and are not subject to any presumption or interpretation otherwise.
You still have to learn how to use these documents in your defense and be able to describe this whole circumstance, but taken together they form a competent rebuttal and evidence trail removing you from any "US citizenship" status, and returning you to your rightful status as an American State National.
And again --- why is all this necessary? Because your identity has been stolen. The Birth Certificate you hold in your hand is irrefutable evidence of the facts.
You were deliberately misidentified as a baby as either a "United States Citizen" [Territorial] or "Citizen of the United States" [Municipal] and unless you rebut the evidence, you will be claimed as chattel belonging as a property asset to one of these foreign commercial crime syndicates.
For additional insight, I recommend the YouTube videos of Jordan Maxwell and any and all lectures regarding the "Justinian Deception" --- the use of Dog Latin--- by Romley Stewart.
Time is of the essence and numbers count, as these crime syndicates know that they have been discovered and that their system has been deconstructed, so that they either make amends or are destroyed by liquidation or worse.
Please join the effort, correct your records, [for Do It Yourself Help go to www.PaperUpNow.com or see Article 928 on my website, www.annavonreitz.com or see the Help Service portal about midway down my website home page to request additional help] and then go to our new sign in service: www.signinamerica.com .
SignInAmerica is an organizational tool to help us identify and as much as possible pre-qualify Americans who have corrected their political status to receive Credit Vouchers to offset debts of the STRAWMAN entities that have been created "in their names".
See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Published on Mar 30, 2008
Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines
Capitalize adj. as… "To take advantage of - To use to ones
Blacks Law Dictionary • Revised 4th Edition 1968,
provides a more comprehensive definition as follows …
Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status
through the use of capitalization) In Roman law. A
diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or
curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of legal
attributes and qualifications.
Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss
of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John
Doe) - The lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss
of status. This occurred where a man's family relations
alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation
[pride] of a person who had been his own master, (sui
juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or
upon the emancipation of one who had been under the
patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of
liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2,
3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom.Law, 144.
Capitis Diminutio Media (meaning a medium loss of
status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John
DOE) - A lessor or medium loss of status. This occurred
where a man loses his rights of citizenship, but without
losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights.
Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss
of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN
DOE or DOE JOHN) - The highest or most
comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man's
condition was changed from one of freedom to one of
bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.
Taken from Esoteric Agenda - The New World Order
Published on Sep 9, 2018
Please watch: "THE US BANKRUPTCY AND THE TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT (SOVEREIGN CITIZENS)"
Audio Book- Cracking the Code Chapter 10 (3rd Edition)
EMAIL LIST: https://tinyurl.com/y7ye7dys
Published on Oct 29, 2010
The Secret of Oz won best documentary of 2010 at the Beloit International Film Festival.
It won the Silver Sierra Award for Excellence in Film making at the Yosemite Film Festival. It won the Award of Merit at The Accolade Competition in La Jolla, California. It won the Silver Screen Award at the Nevada Film Festival. It's received an excellent review on Nathan's Economic Edge, one of the world's top economics blogs. It's British premier was at the prestigious Bromsgrove conference on Oct. 1. What's going on with the world's economy?
Foreclosures are everywhere, unemployment is skyrocketing - and this may only be the beginning. Could it be that solutions to the world's economic problems could have been embedded in the most beloved children's story of all time, "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz"? The yellow brick, the emerald city of Oz, even Dorothy's silver slippers (changed to ruby slippers for the movie version) were powerful symbols of author L. Frank Baum's belief that the people - not the big banks -- should control the quantity of a nation's money. The bottom line: No More National Debt. All our money is created out of debt. But nations don't have to borrow money from banks. Sovereign nations can create their own money -- debt free -- just as Abraham Lincoln did.
Link to full video:
PERSON - Land of the Dead
The key to defining your legal character is the word “person”. Regulations created by government agencies and statutes and/or ordinances passed by elected legislators are all written for legal “persons”. Therefore it is crucial that we understand what a “person” is . . . and what it is not. Here are legal definitions:
Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations (44 U.S.C. Chapter 15 § 1501.Definitions
”person” means an individual, partnership, association, or corporation (4 artificially created legal entities – not one a living being!)
Government code Section 1-26
17. “Person” includes any person, firm, association, organization, partnership, limited liability company, business trust, corporation, or company (9 artificially created legal entities – not one a living being!)
Statutory definitions 1.59
(C) “Person” includes an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, and association (7 artificially created legal entities – not one a living being!)
Uniform Commercial Code Article 1 – General Provisions
Sec 1-201 General Definitions
(27) “Person” means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, government, governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, public corporation, or any other legal or commercial entity. (14 artificially created legally created entities – not one a living being!)
Legal “persons” are not flesh and blood living men and women.
Proof that our laws/statutes are written for legal fiction “persons” and corporations – not for flesh and blood living men and women – can also be found in the legal process by which courts interpret and apply statutory legislation. Sometimes statutes have straightforward meanings, but in many cases, there is some ambiguity or vagueness in the verbiage that must be resolved by a judge. To interpret applicability, judges use various tools and methods, including traditional canons. The judiciary may apply rules of interpretation both to legislation enacted by the legislature and to delegated-legislation such as administrative agency regulations.
Here are three prominent rules considered by judges when they interpret the applicability of statutes/rules:
1) ejusdem generis – rules only apply to persons or things of the same kind or class.
Of the same kind, class, or nature. In statutory construction, the “ejusdem generis rule” is that where general words follow an enumeration of persons or things, by words of a particular and specific meaning, such general words are not to be construed in their widest extent, but are to be held as applying only to persons or things of the same general kind or class as those specifically mentioned.
2) expressio unius est exclusio alterius – one thing having been mentioned, the other is excluded
Is a rule of construction, applying both to statute and legal writings, that states that one thing having been mentioned the other is excluded. Thus, following this rule, ‘no dogs allowed’ means that lions are allowed but guide dogs are excluded.
3) noscitur a sociis – meaning understood from accompanying words
Means comprehended from accompanying words, perceived from accompanying words, realized from accompanying words, recognized from accompanying words, understood from accompanying words
If any or all of these rules are applied to federal regulations, state statutes and the Uniform Commercial Code, it becomes even more apparent that they are not written for living men and women. Corporations are chartered, regulated and taxed by the State, therefore they must use the same legal definition for their customers.
In America the states have authority over relevant matters in their respective jurisdictions, unless the state’s definitions of their statutes conflicts with those recognized federally. This explains why both California and Ohio define “persons” almost identically with the Federal Register and the Uniform Commercial Code.
While the term “character” includes both men and persons, the
way the term “person” is used in statutes – preceding a list of non-living
legal entities – precludes it from referring to living men and women . . . unless the Uniform Commercial Code rule regarding “presumption” is applied! It is presumed that you and I have agreed to represent the non-living legal-fiction “person”, unless we rebut that presumption.
§ 1-206. Presumptions.
Whenever the Uniform Commercial Code creates a “presumption” with respect to a fact, or provides that a fact is “presumed,” the trier of fact must find the existence of the fact unless and until evidence is introduced that supports a finding of its nonexistence.
The difference between legal “persons” and men (or women) is as significant as the difference between life and death and they are expressed differently. JOHN DOE and JANE DOE are “persons”, John Doe is a man and Jane Doe is a woman!
legal “persons” can’t walk
legal “persons” can’t talk
legal “persons” have no gender
Section 1-106. Use of Singular and Plural; Gender.
In the Uniform Commercial Code, unless the statutory context otherwise requires: (1) words in the singular number include the plural, and those in the plural include the singular; and (2) words of any gender also refer to any other gender.
In legal-land, “persons” aren’t real – they are artificially created legal entities/corporations!
One way to rebut the presumption that we have agreed to be a non-living legal-fiction person is to post a Notice of Condition Precedent.
By Anna Von Reitz
So how did your nationality get combined with citizenship? A friend from Australia recently sent me a nicely summarized list of legislative acts from the 1920 through the late 60's, and what it very neatly summarizes is a fundamental change that happened in the 1940's and which has never been corrected.
At the beginning of the legislative history there were numerous "Nationality Acts" in the 1920's and 30's. Then, beginning in the 1940's all of these became "Nationality and Citizenship Acts". This is where your nationality got confused and "lumped together" with your political status as a "citizen" or not.
The organizations passing all these "Nationality and Citizenship Acts" were all functioning in Territorial jurisdictions, so it was no big leap for them to include "citizenship" presumptions with the topic of "nationality". For them, the two are synonymous.
If you live your life as a "resident" (temporary sojourner) in the "State of Wyoming" (a Territorial State of State) you are a federal "citizen" by definition, so that your nationality and citizenship are tied together.
If you live your life at home in Wyoming, you may or may not be a "citizen". It is entirely possible to live your entire life and never be employed by any "federally connected" employer and to never hold any office related to any federal corporation.
And that is the fundamental difference between "us" and "THEM".
We have no natural obligation to serve and obey the government. The government has a natural obligation to serve and obey us. Our nationality is not tied to any obligatory citizenship, but theirs is. And therein lies the rub and the misunderstanding.
People presume that you must be a citizen, because they are, but in fact this is merely a self-interested and unconscionable presumption on the part of the Territorial United States Government that began in the 1940's and which deserves to be soundly rebutted and refused now.
When you are born on the land of a sovereign State, say, New York -- you are under no obligation to act or serve as a Federal Citizen of any kind. They merely "presume" on the basis of a long-vanished war that you are a volunteer willing to assume "Territorial political status".
So that's how your nationality got balled up with the issue of citizenship, which is by nature entirely different.
We now know that the same thing happened worldwide during the Second World War and that "Nationality Acts" in places as diverse as Italy and Australia and the United States underwent the same kind of change to "Nationality and Citizenship Acts" at the same time. This implies in turn at that the participants were acting in Territorial capacity and that people were never returned to their natural birthright political status as non-citizen nationals after the Second World War.
This parallels what went on with the so-called Victory Tax. Prior to the Second World War, only Federal Citizens and federal corporations (like the big railroad corporations) were subject to pay "federal income taxes". During the war the Territorial United States Congress passed the "Victory Tax" which allowed average non-Federal citizen Americans to "voluntarily" contribute an amount equal to that paid by Federal Employees as part of the war effort.
The sunset clause on this legislation stated "the end of hostilities" which by most reckoning means September 1945, but instead, the Territorial United States Congress just left everything in place as if the Second World War was still going on and people were still "volunteering" to pay federal income taxes as part of the effort to win it.
Eighty years later and millions upon millions of Americans have been deprived of their natural birthright nationality which does not include any obligations of citizenship and have paid trillions of dollars worth of federal income taxes they never owed.
It's easy enough to see why the Territorial United States Government wanted everyone to be in "citizenship" status so as to be able to control and commandeer the labor force during the Second World War. It is also easy to see why they wanted the extra income from American workers and why they acted in simple greed and continued on with both these false presumptions after the War---- both Territorial "citizenship" and "voluntary federal income tax" have been foisted off and presumed upon millions of Americans without their knowledge or consent.
And now has come the objection from the lawful government and from the people to this situation and the need to: (1) cease and desist these false presumptions and (2) make amends for them.
It is within our power as individual Americans to reclaim our "reversionary trust interest" in our own birthright prior to when the Territorial Government agents changed our fundamental nationality and citizenship status. We can revert back to being Americans standing on the firm foundation of our land and soil without any citizenship obligations and without any Territorial attachments to our earnings.
And this is why when we talk about Jural Assemblies it is so important for people to grasp what has been done to them in terms of damage to their natural capacities and political status, and why it is necessary for everyone involved in the Jural Assembly process to recoup their natural birthright political status which does not include any obligations of Territorial citizenship.
You were born in Vermont, not Puerto Rico. Say so and inherit the land and soil of your birth, your guaranteed exemptions and immunities, your Natural and Unalienable Rights, and be set free from the obligations of Territorial citizenship.
Run, don't walk, to the Recorder's Office and establish your claim. And if anyone tells you that it isn't "necessary" for you to make this change, tell them it isn't necessary to wipe your butt, either, but the consequences of not doing so have obvious drawbacks.
See 928. Basic Package of Editable Forms http://annavonreitz.com/basicforms.pdf
See this article and over 1200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Self-Governing # 1158.
By Anna Von Reitz
When I was about fifteen and full of beans and would do something a bit rash or get above myself in making comments to adults, my Mother would wag her head and say, “If you don’t govern yourself, someone else will have to do it for you!
And it will be at your cost!”
What she meant by this was not totally, crystal clear to me at the time, but it has become one of those nagging mantras that expands and clarifies its meaning over the rough road of experience and time.
Like all great truths, it’s deceptively simple.
We have to self-discipline ourselves and choose what is right, or we run the risk of having other parties and powers come into our lives to do the job we have avoided doing for ourselves.
For me as a young girl, it had more to do with minding my tongue and being patient.
For many people, failing to self-govern means landing in jail.
For a nation, it is the fundamental requirement of existence.
And for a 150 years, America has not been fully self-governing.
We have faithfully explained and proven step-by-step exactly how the “Federal” part of our Federal Government was usurped in breach of trust by the British-backed Territorial United States, and how as a consequence our Delegated Powers have been exercised
by Britain despite the Revolution, the War of 1812, the outcomes of the Civil War, the Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783, The Constitution for the united States of America, The Constitution of the United States of America, and The Constitution of the United States-----and every rule of law and trust and decency.
Pure and simple, our States were supposed to operate the Federal States of States.
We were supposed to control our monetary policies, our trade policies, our treaties, our war-making, our patent process, our copyrights and everything else that a nation is responsible for self-determining, but we were lulled into a baby-like trusting dependency and ignorance by the perpetrators benefiting themselves at our expense.
We mistook them for us. We let them take over and dominate our foreign policy and use our young people for gun fodder in their wars for profit for a hundred and fifty years.
We let them rob and control our natural resources, stifle our industries, take over our schools, and sell us down the drain in trade deals beneficial to their interests.
We let them copyright our names and create franchises
named after us.
We let them control our patent office.
We failed to self-govern. Amazingly, even after years of discussion about all these topics, I am still having to explain to people that what they assumed was their government, is not.
Even more difficult, I have to explain the necessity of getting off their duffs and providing themselves with the government they are owed.
That thing in your courthouse isn’t your government.
It’s a British-backed colonial outpost.
You have to get organized and restore your own government, and then, you can peaceably oust
Those aren’t your courts.
They aren’t operating under the American Common Law.
They aren’t obeying the Constitution, because they are arbitrarily identifying you as a Territorial Citizen and Territorial Citizens have never been owed any constitutional guarantees.”
“Wha-wha-what’s that you are saying?”“
Am I not speaking plain English?
We’ve been taken over by a bunch of British-backed con men.
What you think of as your government isn’t your government. You have to pick yourselves up and get busy, get organized to restore the government you are owed, and self-govern.
If you don’t self-govern, some other power will come in here and do it for you ----at your cost!”
At the cost of your children’s lives.
At the cost of your homes and businesses.
At the cost of your peace and security.
At the cost of your intelligence and spirit.
At the cost of your health.
They will be glad to govern you.
Even now there are various European-backed efforts ongoing trying to take over our government functions by a process of assumpsit.
The only thing preventing them is our discernment of who they
are and what they are doing and our polite refusal to accept a contract with them.
We’ve got the
Scottish version (again) doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LTD.
And we’ve got the
French version, The Republic for the United States of America.
What’s missing is the actual, factual American Government.
Wake up! Halloooo!
We have to finish the “Reconstruction” that has been left hanging since the Civil War!
There is only one unincorporated entity still doing business as The United States of America and you are part of it by birth, because your State of the Federation – Wisconsin, Ohio, Florida,
Massachusetts, Maine.... is a member.
You are being called to self-govern.
Your States are being called to assemble – that means that you are being called to assemble.
There’s work to do.
Decisions to be made.
Restoration of the actual American Government to be
You have to self-govern, or someone else will be glad to do it for you --- at your cost.
If you want a life worth living, a secure future for your children, control of your assets, a health
environment, good schools, and a thriving economy --- you have to wake up now and get
Pay no attention to what you have hitherto mistaken as “your” government and focus
single-mindedly on building up your own local assemblies, both County and State.
Run don’t walk to your State Assembly and get going.
Send an email to: email@example.com
and start by getting your own political status records corrected by
going to my website, www.annavonreitz.com and scrolling down to Article 928, which gives you instructions and templates to help you reclaim your birthright as an American.
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Ongoing Efforts Requires Ongoing Support.
Please Subscribe with a Monthly Support Option.
Did You Find This Information Useful? Please Show Your Appreciation with a Donation.
One Time Donation You Choose the Amount