We accept the idea that the right of the individual to privately contract is unlimited—within the realm of his or her person, but that does not overcome the Public, International, and Natural Law already established. A mafia assassin can't avoid murder charges by claiming he had a contract to do it. Private contracts cannot and do not overcome Public Law. If the opposite premise prevails any crime could be "legalized" at whim and on an individual basis. When public and private law get commingled and public interest presumes to create private contracts and impose them in secret on individuals, a corollary situation exists: No public-private contract can overcome Public Law, either. If slavery is abolished in the Public Law, no government can privately contract with individuals to enslave them. This is precisely what has happened to create the web of venal interlocking trust directorships operated by the Bar Associations in the form of "public interest trusts" which are all based on either the acceptance or rejection of citizenship obligations. That's why they are so hot to describe everyone as a "citizen" and to presume that everyone they see is a "citizen" under private contract to perform public duties. This is their "hook" used to illegally latch onto you and your property assets and what they use to subject you to their foreign Roman Law. They have put False Claims in place and have claimed to own you as a slave known as a "citizen of the United States". We have exposed the whole system of illegal and immoral latching that takes place when your Mother is asked, "Is your baby a citizen of the United States?" Thinking that they are talking about our country, The United States, and not knowing and not being told the definition of "citizen" millions upon millions of American mothers gave the wrong answer, and for six generations the Vermin have capitalized on that "citizenship contract" that your Mother unknowingly created for you when you were still a baby in your cradle. Today, we proclaim all such undisclosed and inequitable private citizenship contracts imposed upon infants to be null and void and all Legal Presumptions based on the idea that people are or must be either "U.S. Citizens" or "citizens of the United States" or both, to be equally null and void. We deny and repudiate the idea that a public trust interest in living flesh and private assets results from any public service or undisclosed private citizenship contract promising future public service. Our Natural Rights are inalienable and cannot be sold, bought, or given away by any contract, much less an unconscionable one. Today, we declare that all such illegal latching upon American babies is null and void from the instant such a citizenship contract was deemed to exist and the right of an individual to contract does not extend to the creation of any private contract to break Public and Natural Law. Nobody can form any valid contract to enslave himself or anyone else in a world where slavery is outlawed. Today, we also declare the British Crown Corporation and its franchises to be operating in Insurrection against International and Public and Natural Law, including but not limited to 10 USC 253 by seeking to impersonate and enslave individual living people via an impersonation scheme based on the aforementioned undisclosed and merely presumed to exist citizenship contracts. We further declare the British Crown Corporations to be operating private corporate tribunals under color of law and False Pretense of being public courts and having lawful and legal authorities never granted to them. They have operated these courts for purposes of coercive racketeering and plundering of non-existent public trusts and public trust interests based on these same undisclosed and otherwise unconscionable foreign citizenship contracts. The rulings and orders of all such administrative courts aka, Territorial and Municipal CORPORATE tribunals misapplied to living people are null and void for fraud and where any transfer of actual property is involved, these "COURTS" are engaged in racketeering under force and color of law. This illegal confiscation is against our Public Law, our International Law and the Natural Law the people of this country are owed. We declare the members of the Bar Associations who have provided the means to set up and enforce these merely presumed to exist foreign citizenship contracts and who are enforcing False Legal presumptions attendant to them, to be in insurrection against the government of this country and we order Mr. Donald J. Trump to immediately take Notice of this International Proclamation and to bring his operations into compliance with International, Public and Natural Law and to enforce against the Municipal CORPORATIONS hired by the Territorial "States" to provide them and their U.S. Citizens with separate public services, so as to prevent them from any further illegal and immoral false claims against the American People you are all supposed to serve. We, the Americans and our sovereign nation-states, accept all gifts without strings attached and waive all benefits of foreign servitude in any purely or partially imaginary "state" of being or servitude attaching to foreign citizens living in The United States. Members of the Bar Associations who continue to operate corporate tribunals under color of law and who continue to accidentally-on-purpose misaddress Americans as if they were foreign citizens, or intestate public trust "property", are offering continued Insurrection and must be arrested and charged without further delay. Under both Roman Municipal Law and Roman Civil Law, fraud is deadly to all claims, so even under the forms of law they administer, these men and women are found lacking. We declare all public trust interests alleged to exist as a result of the aforementioned undisclosed private foreign citizenship contracts to be null and void and unenforceable. Any scheme to deprive any American of any guarantee or right or service provided under any Federal Constitution or under Natural Law, no matter how this end is achieved, is an act of insurrection: 10 USC 253., whether by a foreign state or a domestic enemy, a commercial corporation, or a municipal corporation or any private guild, union, society, association or club —-or Roman Municipal Trust —- all Principals and Officers stand condemned for fraud and evasion of their own obligation to provide our people with essential government services in "good faith" and must cease and desist the herein described practices and assertions of private foreign citizenship contracts and foreign public trust interests based on such contracts being insupportably held against Americans and against our Public Interest. The offending corporate tribunals including all "local" STATE Municipal Corporation Tribunals and CORPORATIONS pretending to be "Judiciary Courts" must be shut down immediately for fraud and racketeering. Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents, Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS; NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS. Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger— Fiduciary The United States of America Alaska Supreme Court Justice In care of: Box 520994 Big Lake, Alaska 99652 September 21st 2025 ------------------ See this article and over 5500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. How do we use your donations? Find out here. Important News For AmericansAlso See:5542. International Public Notice: Criminal Information Regarding the Great Fraud http://annavonreitz.com/crimeinfoofgreatfraud.pdf 5544. International Public Notice: Illegal "Civil War" Era Courts Still in Operation http://annavonreitz.com/civilwareracourts.pdf 5545. International Public Notice: The Law of Kinds http://annavonreitz.com/lawofkinds2.pdf 5546. International Public Notice: The Law of Kinds -- Notice to U.S. Armed Forces http://annavonreitz.com/noticetousarmedforces.pdf 5547. International Public Notice: False Claims in Trade and Commerce http://annavonreitz.com/falseclaimsintradeandcommerce.pdf
0 Comments
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents There are three populations in this country. There are the average Americans making up the General Public who live in the physically-defined States of the Union. There are U.S. Citizens who adopt British Territorial political status and live here under the provisions of the Residence Act. Lastly, there are Municipal citizens of the United States who are members of a foreign theocracy associated with the Roman Catholic Church. Each group has its own laws, functions, and jurisdictions. The members of the General Populace have general jurisdiction and can consider any matter that they choose to investigate. The administration of their government is under Public Law and Common Law endemic to their States and Counties. The U.S. Citizens who are Subjects of the King have a limited jurisdiction related to Territorial duties under the Northwest Ordinance, and safe conduct of Americans on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. The administration of their government is under Federal Code. The Municipal citizens of the United States also have a strictly limited jurisdiction related primarily to providing postal, patent, copyright, banking, and trademark services. They are subjects of the Pope and work under the direction of his subcontractors and administrators. The administration of their government is under Municipal Code. The General Public and the two foreign citizenries do not share the same viewpoints on any number issues, and because they operate under different forms of law, do not have the same obligations, either. The contractual obligations of the two foreign citizenries owed to the General Public are spelled out in their service contracts, The Constitution of the United States of America, and The Constitution of the United States, respectively. It should not surprise anyone that these groups view the events of 1861 from different viewpoints. The American General Public views the break-up of the Confederation of States on April 1st 1861 and the resulting inability of the Federal Republic, our American-based Federal Subcontractor, to continue its functions owed under The Constitution for the united States of America, as an irritating nuisance and dereliction of duty. However, in this eventuality, those duties naturally return to the Delegator, which in this case is the unincorporated Federation of States, dba, The United States of America. The actual States can muddle around and decide to reconstruct or not reconstruct the failed Confederation of States that they created for as long as they choose to muddle and it is nobody's business but theirs. The British Territorial U.S. Citizens had a totally different experience with regard to the same events, because only two weeks later, their President (meaning the President of the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation), Abraham Lincoln, called their foreign Territorial Congress into Session and substituted it for the "missing" Federal Congress, claiming a pretense of "emergency" that didn't actually exist. From there on, Lincoln seized the opportunity to rule as a petty dictator. To sum it up in the words of another dedicated researcher who happens to be British: "In April 1861, the American and English common law was abolished and replaced with legal fiction "laws," a.k.a. Statutes, Rules, and Codes based on Executive Order and not the due process specified within the organic Constitution." Please note that this is what the U.S. Citizens experienced, and that this is what happened to them owing to the actions of their President--- but the same did not apply to the General Public. Please also notice that the "organic Constitution" referenced is the original Federal Constitution of 1787. Continuing to quote from the British point of view: "Existing and functioning under the law of necessity ab initio, they [the above referenced legal fiction "laws"] are all non-law and cannot validly assert jurisdiction, authority, or demand for compliance from anyone. They [the above referenced legal fiction "laws"] are entirely "rules of rulership," i.e. organized piracy, privilege, plunder, and enslavement, invented and enforced by those who would rule over others by legalized violence in the complete absence of moral authority, adequate knowledge, and natural law mechanics to accomplish any results other than disruption, conflict, damage, and devastation." This is the "rule of law" that its proponents constantly reference and attempt to justify and protect, which even by their own standards, the British recognize and abhor as a false form or "color" of law. Continuing to quote: "The established maxim of law applies: "Extra territorium just dicenti non paretur impune.' "One who exercises jurisdiction out of his territory cannot be obeyed with impunity." [10 Co. 77; Dig. 2. 1. 20; Story, Confl. Laws ' 539; Broom, Max. 100, 101]" With this as a preface, and continuing to quote from the British Territorial viewpoint and from the standpoint of their understanding as U.S. Citizens: "Legal fiction "laws," such as the Reconstruction Acts and the implementation of the Lieber Code, were instituted by Lincoln soon thereafter and became the basis for the current "laws" in the US. Every purported "Act" [of the Territorial or Municipal Congresses or State-of-State Legislatures] in effect today is "de facto," based on colorable fictitious entities created arbitrarily, out of nothing, without verification, lawful foundation, or lawful due process. All of such "laws" are not law, but rules of rulership by force/conquest, originating from and existing in military, martial law jurisdiction. Military, martial law jurisdiction: = jurisdiction of war = win/lose interactions consisting of eating or being eaten, living or dying = food chain = law of necessity = suspension of all law other than complete freedom to act in any manner to eat, kill, or destroy or avoid being eaten, killed, or destroyed = no law = lawlessness = complete absence of all lawful basis to create any valid law. Contractually, being a victim of those acting on the alleged authority granted by the law of necessity, = no lawful object, valuable consideration, free consent of all involved parties, absence of fraud, duress, malice, and undue influence: = no bona fide, enforceable contract = no valid, enforceable nexus = absolute right to engage in any action of any kind in self-defense = complete and total right to disregard any alleged jurisdiction and demands from self-admitted outlaws committing naked criminal aggression without any credibility and right to demand allegiance and compliance from anyone. Every President of the United States since Lincoln has functioned by Executive Orders issued from a military, martial law jurisdiction with the only "law" being the "law of necessity," i.e. the War Powers. The War Powers are nothing new. Indeed, they have been operational from the instant the first man thought he would "hide from God," and try to cheat ethical and natural law by overreaching, to invade the space and territory of others, covet other people's land or property, steal the fruits of their labors, and attempt to succeed in life by win/lose games. All existing "authority" in the United States today derives [for U.S. Citizens] exclusively from the War Powers." That, in summary, was the viewpoint and experience and condition that Lincoln left the U.S. Citizens in. They assumed that they were occupying this country under the Laws of Conquest, when in fact, there wasn't even a War declared; and, they were employed and paid by the same people they were pretending to have conquered -- as mercenaries. The British Monarch, the Principal responsible for correcting this "miscommunication" sat on his butt and did nothing, and let this misdirection and misunderstanding continue, because it was to his financial and political advantage. To make sure that this lamentable misunderstanding on the part of U.S. Citizens and U.S. Presidents continued, they were ordered to operate under a "cloak of secrecy" -- apparently so the American General Public wouldn't take action to correct the situation and they, the U.S. Citizens, would be allowed to continue these ridiculous presumptions and operations on our shores. A similar but somewhat worse situation pertains to those Municipal citizens of the United States who were sold into slavery by Franklin Delano Roosevelt. This was particularly cheeky on Roosevelt's part, as he had no ownership interest in these people and his presumption, that they were "stateless" and subject to capture and disposal as "abandoned vessels" under marine salvage law, was equally lacking in good sense, contractual basis, and logic. Again, the very people who were paying his salary were being mistaken, accidentally-on-purpose, as being in a foreign political status and lacking the protections of our lawful Government, simply because a Federal Subcontractor ceased operations. The Pope and the City of Rome administration that he has employed to fulfill the juicy service contracts available under the auspices of The Constitution of the United States have been, if possible, even more secretive and have operated in gross breach of trust with respect to their own employees and the American People who have been paying the bill for all this disservice and criminality. From the perspective of the Municipal citizens of the United States, all they know is what comes down through their chain of command. They lack even the skills and education required to analyze the situation in the way presented above on behalf of the British Territorial U.S. Citizens. Thus we are a presented with a Farce in Three Parts: The American General Public left totally out of the loop concerning what their Federal Employees are doing, how they are doing it, or what their employees' presumptions about their own situation may be, so that the Americans fail to take action to correct the situation. The British Territorial U.S. Citizens, aware that they are in violation of the actual Law and are operating as pirates under "rule of law" instead, quietly protesting the circumstance, not understanding how they became redefined as dishonorable mercenaries, but knowing that they lack any authority beyond the "law of tooth and claw" to abuse their kind employers. The Municipal citizenry blindly taking orders whatever those orders might be, trusting their superiors in a chain of authority stretching all the way to Rome and back, vaguely aware that they are low men on the totem pole, are expendable, and resenting it without the capacity to analyze why. Thankfully, the Americans making up the General Public and populace of this country finally woke up and observed the Carpetbagger Courts still in operation, the foreign bill collectors (the Municipal IRS and Territorial Internal Revenue Service) plying their trades, and divined the false ideas and presumptions underlying this entire situation. We are still here. We are still operating our American Government. And all our Treaty Partners and the other Principals to Contract still owe us the good faith service, protections, and guarantees we are heir to. This is International Notice to the Agents and the Principals and to the banks serving them, of these facts. Our assets and good names have not been "abandoned" and we have seized upon the public trusts created in error accordingly, as of 2014. We have served Due Process for a period of seven (7) years concerning these matters so that no party has any reason to protest or complain about our action. The U.S. Citizens need to be fully informed that they are not living under the "rule of law". They are living under our general jurisdiction and under the supreme law governing our relations with them: The Constitution of the United States of America. To a lesser degree, the U.S. Citizens operate under the Residence Act, and to the extent that it applies, the Northwest Ordinance, and those Acts creating the District of Columbia and its Municipal Corporation. The U.S. Citizens are not lawfully or legally occupying our country and cannot under the present scenario claim to be a military protectorate, or assume any other contract besides The Constitution of the United States of America. The U.S. Citizens are required to be under the direction of our civilian government which is now in session and which has instructed them to close and secure our Southern Border, and take other actions to secure our property and lives and to honor the spirit and intent of their only service contract, which is owed to the living people and Lawful Persons of this country. The Municipal citizenry is similarly required to obey the letter and spirit of their only contract and the source of their permission to be here: The Constitution of the United States. Regardless of whatever their leaders are telling them, this remains the international law. The Principals responsible for this mess must be held accountable for their actions and inactions; now that we have finally become aware of the situation, which was deliberately obscured to promote fraud upon us, we have done our part to correct and provide the Federal Subcontractors with appropriate direction. Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary In care of: Box 520994 Big Lake, Alaska 99652 September 3rd 2023 ---------------------------- See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. How do we use your donations? Find out here. Also See: 5545. International Public Notice: The Law of Kinds http://annavonreitz.com/lawofkinds2.pdf 5546. International Public Notice: The Law of Kinds -- Notice to U.S. Armed Forces http://annavonreitz.com/noticetousarmedforces.pdf Public International Notice -- Notice to VacateImportant News For Americans Yesterday, I reminded everyone that there literally is and can be no British Monarchy, and that there hasn't been any such thing since 1087 A.D. --- because William the Conqueror made sure of it with the details of The Norman Settlement which took place upon his death in that year. William was so determined that there would never again be any legitimate British Monarchy that he denied his own sons as much as a cubic centimeter of dirt in England. All those people who have been strutting around Buckingham Palace for centuries are not actually British and they are not actually kings or queens, either. The present "Queen of England" is a German. She is as British as I am. Literally. And she isn't a "Queen" either; she is an Agent for the Pope, overseeing his Commonwealth interests in England. Instead of a "British Queen'' we've been dealing with a "German Papist Overlord of the Commonwealth". In the same way, people are still not grasping the enormity of the fact that "America" is in no way the same as "the U.S." or "the United States, Inc." America is a good and moral country full of good people. The U.S. is as foreign to us as France and the United States, Inc. isn't a country. It's a commercial corporation in the business of providing governmental services. The world is still confused about all of this. And now we come to another little bon mot in the weird, but obvious, history of Israel. Israel is literally owned as a private nation-state by Jacob Rothschild. Literally. No joke. Some billionaires buy themselves private islands. Some defrocked priests of Baal get together to buy little mini-nation-states like the Inner City of London or Vatican City or the Municipality of Washington, DC, which are all about one square mile in area---- and completely separate from the rest of the countries they inhabit. But no puny islands or postage stamp kingdoms for Jacob Rothschild. He wanted a whole country. And he got it. He basically bought Israel from the Government of Westminster and engineered the entire circumstance related to the British Protectorate in the Middle East and the infamous Balfour Declaration. The rights and needs and priority placement of the people that were afterward gratuitously dubbed "Palestinians" by the label-makers, didn't enter into Jacob Rothschild's head. Or anyone else's, either. "It's his, and he can do what he likes with it." a friend of mine observed many years ago. "Not only did he buy it, the members of the Knesset are his employees." ---------------------------- See this article and over 3500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. How do we use your donations? Find out here. A Remedy, By Anna von Reitz / 2/4/2017 Finally, Thank God and Thanks to Many People, a Remedy That Cannot Be Stopped or Side-Stepped or Ignored —- Judge Anna. First, please be patient with yourself as you read through these facts. It took years of hard labor by dozens of good people to ferret out each little piece of this. It’s going to take you at least an hour or two to take it in and follow the logic to its inexorable conclusion. When you get to the end, you will find a template that lays out the very simple one-page Fraud Killer. This does not mean that you should abandon your efforts to document your own identity and proper standing and that of your relatives—but you now have in your hands a very powerful means to break the shackles of the Great Fraud. ________________________________________________ Definition(s) of “United States” and “UNITED STATES” and “United States of America” and “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”….. _________________________________________________ Note the date and by what entity— an “acting” Congress during the Civil War—this was done: 1864– the “acting Congress” passed an Act changing the meaning of “state, States and United States” to mean “the territories and District of Columbia”. (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864.) [“US Territories”—- portions of the United States that are not within the limits of any state and have not been admitted as states. Includes all federal installations—military bases, docks, courthouses, etc.] This was never changed, amended or appealed, so, all references to “state, States, and United States” in Federal Code that are not otherwise specifically defined, must be construed as “the territories and District of Columbia”. You must also make a distinction between the meaning of the words used prior to and then after the passage of this 1864 corporate law. Prior to this, “state, States, and United States” meant what we commonly still believe them to mean— after 1864 in “Federal Code”—they generally meant something entirely different and opposed to the popular meaning. Three Crucial Definitions, Plus a Fourth in Commerce: “ The term “United States” may be used in any one of several senses. (1) It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. (2) It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States (that is, the territories and District of Columbia) extends, or (3) it may be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution.” — Hooven and Allison Company v. Evatt, 324 US 652 (1945) (This is also the verbatim definition of “United States” given in Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition.) Additionally…. we have definition (4) thanks to: The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, Congress chartered a Federal Company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.,” in accordance with the 14th Amendment [which the record indicates was never ratified— see Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly 484.] Please note: that The Act of 1871 —“An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 — was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions—- “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)) . When looking at the intent of all this, given that the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, as it must be, merely to set up “U.S. Corp”-- “That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the “District of Columbia”, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation.” – Act of 1871 verbiage-- So the Act of 1871 was to create a private corporation owned by the actual government of the District of Columbia— thus the birth of the infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation: The only “government” created by the Act of 1871 was that of any private corporation which determines its own administrative rules and structures…….that is, the US Corp dba “UNITED STATES” is not merely the name of an incorporated municipality (District of Columbia)— it is the name of a private corporation (District of Columbia Municipal Corporation) that was created by the “acting Congress” via the Act of 1877 and as amended ever since. Few Americans realize that there are all these definitions for the “United States.” Most have been misled to believe that the term “United States” has a single meaning and is a generic term referring to the country as a whole–However, in Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), it stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is also the name of a corporation, as just demonstrated from the public records. _____________________________________________________ Does the UNITED STATES – the private corporation operating the government of “the Territories and District of Columbia” have “citizens”? 1873: U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) “The term resident and citizen of the United States (”United States” meaning “territories and District of Columbia”) is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” (That is a “citizen of the United States” is a “statutory citizen”—created by legislative action.) 1875 – This definition of “United States” as a Corporation has its own citizens (see United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542) who are generally referred to as United States citizens. 1953 – Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383 “A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government…” 1967 – Also Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646): A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4. [This neatly explains once and for all what a “citizen of the United States” is in federal parlance, as opposed to popular speech, and underlines the need for Americans to forthrightly expatriate from any such “citizenship” and instead declare their allegiance to the land of their nativity, for example, California or Nevada or Ohio.] ______________________________________________________ Can a corporation be a citizen? Diversity of citizenship exists when opposing parties in a lawsuit are citizens of different states or a citizen of a foreign country. If the party is a corporation, it is a citizen of the state where it is incorporated or is doing business. If diversity of citizenship exists, it places the case under federal court jurisdiction pursuant to Article III, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. ____________________________________ The same duplicitous wordsmithing was done with the words “United States of America”-- From A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier, published 1856: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (First meaning given): (1) The name of this country. [That is, the actual land mass.] The United States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and California.” (Fifth meaning): (5)—The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property, 1 Marsh, Dec. 177, 181, but it is proper to observe that no suit can be brought against the United States without authority of law. ______________________________________ So what does all this tell us? So far as the federal government is concerned the phrase “United States” has meant “the territories and District of Columbia” since 1864, and the “United States Corporation” has been the “government” of the “territories and District of Columbia” since 1877. A similar thing was done with the phrase “United States of America” in which it was used as the name of this country, but then is also used to name a corporation— the “United States of America, Inc.” These two privately owned and operated corporations have been bankrupted consecutively— “the United States of America, Inc.” in 1933 and the UNITED STATES entered into insolvency as of March 2015. When it is announced that the “UNITED STATES” is insolvent, what does that mean? It means that the corporation operating “as” the government of the “territories and District of Columbia” is insolvent and subject to liquidation of its assets. And who — or what — is on the hook to pay for all this? All the “citizens of the UNITED STATES” which this corporation created out of thin air to benefit itself and which it has operated under your names—- JOHN MARK DOE and MABEL HELEN RHODES and JEAN MARIE FITZPATRICK…. as “a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.” Here you can clearly see that both the USA, Inc. and the US, Inc. are acting in collusion to bilk and indebt the unsuspecting American People by mischaracterizing them and their political status. What has been done here is nothing less than “slavery by proxy”. A corporate franchise has been named after you, and then, you have been coerced and deceived into accepting the debts of that franchise via a “similar names” deceit. Prior to 1933, a Foreign Situs Trust created by the USA, Inc. was named after a living man called “John Frederick Doe” and this Foreign Situs Trust was then also gratuitously named as a Surety for the bankrupt USA, Inc’s debts. The actual man named John Frederick Doe was then pursued and forced to pay the debts owed in fact by this corporation. In 1999 that bankruptcy settled and the American People paid off every penny of it. In approximately 1944 the US. Inc., named a Cestui Que Vie Trust after the living man called “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” and this estate trust was named as the Surety for the US Inc.’s debts. The actual man named John Frederick Doe was then pursued and forced to pay the debts owed by this corporate franchise, too. This past year, 2015, President Obama acting as the CEO in charge of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. (the USA, Inc’s latest rendition organized under the laws of the United Nations City-State) announced the creation of a new franchise named after “John Frederick Doe”— a franchise of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Utility named “JOHN F. DOE” operated under the laws of Puerto Rico. Meanwhile the living American who is the Holder in Due Course of the given name “John Frederick Doe” and who is in fact the owner and executor of his name and all derivatives thereof associated with him, is being subjected to false charges and racketeering on a scale unique in world history. ________________________________________ So…… What to DO about it? _________________________________________ In order to answer that, you need a few more definitions and research…. What is NATIONALITY? –“That quality or character which arises from the fact of a person’s belonging to a nation or state. Nationality determines the political status of the individual, especially with reference to allegiance; while domicile determines his civil status. Nationality arises either by birth or by naturalization. According to Savigny, “nationality” is also used as opposed to “territoriality,” for the purpose of distinguishing the case of a nation having no national territory.” –The Law Dictionary. Please note that nationality can be applied according to the country—the land— where you are born, whereas citizenship is a legal status adopted when you are registered with the government in some country. Nationality can also be an inheritance from one’s parents as when a child is born to Americans living overseas, but one only becomes a citizen of a country via the adoption of a political status. You can’t change your nationality, but you can change your citizenship, i.e., political status. Every American–except first generation immigrants– was born on the land of one of the American states or born to parents or grandparents who were, and so by (1) birthright or by (2) inheritance, every American is naturally an American State National, and not a “citizen of the United States”. You are a native of Florida or Wisconsin or Texas….and your proper nationality is as a Floridian, Wisconsinite or Texan….. and so on, and during your lifetime you do not “belong to” the organic state being referenced, instead, the state—the land— belongs to you. But then, a dirty trick was played on your Mother at the hospital. People she trusted came to her and told her that it was the “law” that she has to sign certain papers. Unknown to her, those papers register her baby as a “citizen of the United States”—- and we already know what that means. The baby is “seized upon” as a surety backing the debts of the USA, Inc. and the US, Inc. and via the illicit copyrighting of his given name, the baby is identified as chattel property belonging to these private mostly foreign owned corporations. However, fraud vitiates everything. It destroys all contracts and presumptions. It taints everything it touches. All Americans subjected to this undisclosed process have been defrauded and mischaracterized and deprived of their lawful status. There is no statute of limitations on the crime of fraud and it is recognized as a crime in all venues and jurisdictions of law, national and international, and global. Okay, so…. Sorting the Poop from the Shinola…. Section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) states that “the term ‘national of the United States’ means (A) a citizen of the United States (read that, “territories and the District of Columbia”), or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States (again, “territories and the District of Columbia”).” Therefore, U.S. citizens are also U.S. nationals. Non-citizen nationality status refers only to individuals who were born either in American Samoa or on Swains Island to parents who are not citizens of the United States. This is all talking about “citizens of the United States” that is, “citizens of the federal government corporation”. INA § 349 states that a citizen, whether a U.S. citizen by birth or naturalization [JOHN FREDERICK DOE is a U.S. citizen by process of “naturalization”] shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing certain acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality. The fact of intention is critical; it is not the mere performance of the actions mentioned in § 349. Seven types of conduct are currently listed in the INA as expatriative. The potentially expatriating acts are: (1) applying for and obtaining naturalization in a foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old; (2) making an oath of allegiance to a foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old; (3) serving in the military of a foreign country as a commissioned or noncommissioned officer or when the foreign state is engaged in hostilities against the United States; (4) serving in a foreign government position that requires an oath of allegiance to or the nationality of that foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old; (5) making a formal renunciation of U.S. citizenship to a consular officer outside of the United States; (6) making a formal renunciation of citizenship while in the United States and during time that the United States is involved in a war; and (7) conviction for treason or attempting by force to overthrow the U.S. government [that is, corporation], including conspiracy convictions. ——————————————————– Now, finally, consider this supremely important information regarding the separate and “foreign” status of the United States defined as “territories and District of Columbia” (1864) with regard to the actual several states forming the United States (definition (3) from the Hooven case) —-nailed down by “The Informer”: A key authority on this question (is the federal “United States” a foreign entity with respect to the states of the United States?) is the case of Hanley v. Donoghue, in which the U.S. Supreme Court defined separate bodies of State law as being legally “foreign” with respect to each other: “No court is to be charged with the knowledge of foreign laws; but they are well understood to be facts which must, like other facts, be proved before they can be received in a court of justice. [cites omitted] It is equally well settled that the several states of the Union are to be considered as in this respect foreign to each other, and that the courts of one state are not presumed to know, and therefore not bound to take judicial notice of, the laws of another state.” [Hanley v. Donoghue, 116 U.S. 1, 29 L. Ed. 535] [6 S.Ct. 242, 244 (1885)] Another key U.S. Supreme Court authority on this question is the case of In re Merriam’s Estate, 36 N.E. 505 (1894). The authors of Corpus Juris Secundum (“CJS”), a legal encyclopedia, relied in part upon this case to arrive at the following conclusion about the “foreign” corporate status of the federal government: “The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” [citing In re Merriam’s Estate, 36 N.E. 505, 141 N.Y. 479, affirmed U.S. v. Perkins, 16 S.Ct. 1073, 163 U.S. 625, 41 L.Ed 287] [19 C.J.S. 883] Before you get the idea that this meaning of “foreign” is now totally antiquated, consider the current edition of Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, which defines “foreign state” very clearly, as follows: “The several United States*** are considered “foreign” to each other except as regards their relations as common members of the Union. … The term “foreign nations,” as used in a statement of the rule that the laws of foreign nations should be proved in a certain manner, should be construed to mean all nations and states other than that in which the action is brought; and hence one state of the Union is foreign to another, in the sense of that rule.” And a recent federal statute proves that Congress still refers to the 50 States as “countries”. When a State court in Alaska needed a federal judge to handle a case overload, Congress amended Title 28 to make that possible. In its reference to the 50 States, the statute is titled the “Assignment of Judges to courts of the freely associated compact states”. Then, Congress refers to these freely associated compact states as “countries”: (b) The Congress consents to the acceptance and retention by any judge so authorized of reimbursement from the countries referred to in subsection (a) …. [!!!] [28 U.S.C. 297, 11/19/88]” — End quote. So here is the Big Picture…… The government of the “United States” (read that as: “the territories and District of Columbia” per the 1864 redefinition) is a corporation also called the “UNITED STATES” or “U.S. Corp” or “US, Inc.” set up by the Act of 1877. That corporation doing business as the US, Inc., and a similar corporation operating as the USA, Inc., have been creating “citizens” for themselves out of thin air, defined as corporate “persons” of various kinds, named after living Americans. All of these foreign corporate franchises named after you are “citizens of the United States” — meaning (4), “citizens of the United States” or as Kitchens v. Steele put it, “citizens of the federal government” [i.e., corporation]. Currently, the US, Inc. version is doing business as a Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust under the name “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” or whatever your “FIRST MIDDLE LAST” name may be, operated out of Puerto Rico. The USA, Inc. version is doing business as a franchise of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Utility under the name “JOHN F. DOE” or whatever your “FIRST MIDDLE-INITIAL LAST” name may be. Again, Puerto Rico, a Commonwealth Protectorate of the United States is operating as a semi-autonomous Home Base for all this crime against Americans. Take all this information into a nice, big, sticky Ball of Wax and what do you get? (1) Since “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” is a naturalized “citizen of the United States”, “HE” can be expatriated by INA 349 (2) “making an oath of allegiance to a foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old” and (2) since the actual states of the Union are all foreign countries with respect to the “United States” referenced, you can repatriate “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” to Wisconsin or Illinois or wherever else he rightfully came from by issuing an Oath of Allegiance to the land he was born on—Wisconsin, Texas, etc., and (3) Sending a certified copy of the new Oath of Allegiance signed by John Frederick Doe (your name substituted appropriately) to John Forbes Kerry, the US (Corporation) Secretary of State, telling him that “JOHN” is expatriating and going home and by the way— all his assets are due and owing as a Priority Creditor of the UNITED STATES. Please send a copy to the United Nations Secretary General and ask him to notify the UN Bankruptcy Trustees presently trying to liquidate the assets of the UNITED STATES, so they can exclude JOHN FREDERICK DOE from the asset roster. Same thing with “JOHN F. DOE”. And there isn’t a thing these con artists in suits can say, do, or complain about, because their other option is to admit to their crimes in front of the whole world. “John Frederick Doe” —is still standing on terra firma, still have your wits about you, and are still able to say that you are a “Citizen of these United States”. Example: Act of Expatriation and Oath of Allegiance Whereas “FIRST MIDDLE LAST” is a naturalized “citizen of the United States” under the Diversity Clause of the Constitution(s) and is the age of majority and whereas such “citizenship” was never desired nor intended nor willingly nor voluntarily entered into, “FIRST MIDDLE LAST” willingly and purposefully renounces all citizenship or other assumed political status related to the United States defined as “the territories and District of Columbia” (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864) and its government, a corporation doing business variously as the UNITED STATES, U.S. Corp, US, Inc., etc. formed under the Act of 1877, and does repatriate to the land of HIS birth known as Wisconsin (Texas, etc. as it applies) and does freely affirm HIS allegiance to the same actual and organic state of the Union and does accept HIS true Nationality as an American State National and an American State Vessel in all international commerce owned and operated by Doe, John Frederick of 1121 Petaluma Court, Felsburg, Florida, 10210. This do I certify, Witness and confirm this _____day of _______, 2016. ______________________________ by John Frederick Doe, all rights reserved. Notary Witness Clark County Florida State Before me this _____day of ________ 2016 did appear one JOHN FREDERICK DOE and he did establish this Act of Expatriation and Oath of Allegiance freely and without coercion, in Witness whereof I set my sign and seal. _________________________________Notary; my commission expires on________________________.
The Municipal Government operating as “the United States” is not The United States.
Donald Trump Suggests US Could Join British Commonwealth – But … isn’t the USA already a British crown colony?How the War-Profiteering Scheme Has Been WorkedHow Your Government Is SUPPOSE To WorkLearn The NECESSARY Steps to Self Governing As A Lawful Person
|
Reader Supported Truth and Freedom Education
The American States AssembLIES
|
















RSS Feed

