A Remedy,
By Anna von Reitz / 2/4/2017


 


Finally, Thank God and Thanks to Many People, a Remedy That Cannot Be Stopped or Side-Stepped or Ignored —- Judge Anna.

​ First, please be patient with yourself as you read through these facts. It took years of hard labor by dozens of good people to ferret out each little piece of this. It’s going to take you at least an hour or two to take it in and follow the logic to its inexorable conclusion.
When you get to the end, you will find a template that lays out the very simple one-page Fraud Killer. This does not mean that you should abandon your efforts to document your own identity and proper standing and that of your relatives—but you now have in your hands a very powerful means to break the shackles of the Great Fraud.
________________________________________________
Definition(s) of “United States” and “UNITED STATES” and “United States of America” and “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”…..
_________________________________________________
Note the date and by what entity— an “acting” Congress during the Civil War—this was done:
1864– the “acting Congress” passed an Act changing the meaning of “state, States and United States” to mean “the territories and District of Columbia”. (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864.)
[“US Territories”—- portions of the United States that are not within the limits of any state and have not been admitted as states. Includes all federal installations—military bases, docks, courthouses, etc.]
This was never changed, amended or appealed, so, all references to “state, States, and United States” in Federal Code that are not otherwise specifically defined, must be construed as “the territories and District of Columbia”.
You must also make a distinction between the meaning of the words used prior to and then after the passage of this 1864 corporate law.
Prior to this, “state, States, and United States” meant what we commonly still believe them to mean— after 1864 in “Federal Code”—they generally meant something entirely different and opposed to the popular meaning.
Three Crucial Definitions, Plus a Fourth in Commerce:
“ The term “United States” may be used in any one of several senses. (1) It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. (2) It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States (that is, the territories and District of Columbia) extends, or (3) it may be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution.” — Hooven and Allison Company v. Evatt, 324 US 652 (1945) (This is also the verbatim definition of “United States” given in Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition.)
Additionally…. we have definition (4) thanks to: The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, Congress chartered a Federal Company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.,” in accordance with the 14th Amendment [which the record indicates was never ratified— see Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly 484.]
Please note: that The Act of 1871 —“An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 — was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions—- “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)) .
When looking at the intent of all this, given that the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, as it must be, merely to set up “U.S. Corp”--
“That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the “District of Columbia”, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation.” – Act of 1871 verbiage--
So the Act of 1871 was to create a private corporation owned by the actual government of the District of Columbia— thus the birth of the infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation:
The only “government” created by the Act of 1871 was that of any private corporation which determines its own administrative rules and structures…….that is, the US Corp dba “UNITED STATES” is not merely the name of an incorporated municipality (District of Columbia)— it is the name of a private corporation (District of Columbia Municipal Corporation) that was created by the “acting Congress” via the Act of 1877 and as amended ever since.
Few Americans realize that there are all these definitions for the “United States.” Most have been misled to believe that the term “United States” has a single meaning and is a generic term referring to the country as a whole–However, in Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), it stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is also the name of a corporation, as just demonstrated from the public records.
_____________________________________________________
Does the UNITED STATES – the private corporation operating the government of “the Territories and District of Columbia” have “citizens”?
1873: U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) “The term resident and citizen of the United States (”United States” meaning “territories and District of Columbia”) is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” (That is a “citizen of the United States” is a “statutory citizen”—created by legislative action.)
1875 – This definition of “United States” as a Corporation has its own citizens (see United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542) who are generally referred to as United States citizens.
1953 – Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383 “A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government…”
1967 – Also Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646): A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.
[This neatly explains once and for all what a “citizen of the United States” is in federal parlance, as opposed to popular speech, and underlines the need for Americans to forthrightly expatriate from any such “citizenship” and instead declare their allegiance to the land of their nativity, for example, California or Nevada or Ohio.]
______________________________________________________
Can a corporation be a citizen?
Diversity of citizenship exists when opposing parties in a lawsuit are citizens of different states or a citizen of a foreign country. If the party is a corporation, it is a citizen of the state where it is incorporated or is doing business. If diversity of citizenship exists, it places the case under federal court jurisdiction pursuant to Article III, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.
____________________________________
The same duplicitous wordsmithing was done with the words “United States of America”--
From A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier, published 1856:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (First meaning given):
(1) The name of this country. [That is, the actual land mass.] The United States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and California.”
(Fifth meaning): (5)—The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property, 1 Marsh, Dec. 177, 181, but it is proper to observe that no suit can be brought against the United States without authority of law.
______________________________________
So what does all this tell us? So far as the federal government is concerned the phrase “United States” has meant “the territories and District of Columbia” since 1864, and the “United States Corporation” has been the “government” of the “territories and District of Columbia” since 1877.
A similar thing was done with the phrase “United States of America” in which it was used as the name of this country, but then is also used to name a corporation— the “United States of America, Inc.”
These two privately owned and operated corporations have been bankrupted consecutively— “the United States of America, Inc.” in 1933 and the UNITED STATES entered into insolvency as of March 2015.
When it is announced that the “UNITED STATES” is insolvent, what does that mean? It means that the corporation operating “as” the government of the “territories and District of Columbia” is insolvent and subject to liquidation of its assets.
And who — or what — is on the hook to pay for all this?
All the “citizens of the UNITED STATES” which this corporation created out of thin air to benefit itself and which it has operated under your names—- JOHN MARK DOE and MABEL HELEN RHODES and JEAN MARIE FITZPATRICK…. as “a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.”
Here you can clearly see that both the USA, Inc. and the US, Inc. are acting in collusion to bilk and indebt the unsuspecting American People by mischaracterizing them and their political status.
What has been done here is nothing less than “slavery by proxy”.
A corporate franchise has been named after you, and then, you have been coerced and deceived into accepting the debts of that franchise via a “similar names” deceit.
Prior to 1933, a Foreign Situs Trust created by the USA, Inc. was named after a living man called “John Frederick Doe” and this Foreign Situs Trust was then also gratuitously named as a Surety for the bankrupt USA, Inc’s debts. The actual man named John Frederick Doe was then pursued and forced to pay the debts owed in fact by this corporation. In 1999 that bankruptcy settled and the American People paid off every penny of it.
In approximately 1944 the US. Inc., named a Cestui Que Vie Trust after the living man called “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” and this estate trust was named as the Surety for the US Inc.’s debts. The actual man named John Frederick Doe was then pursued and forced to pay the debts owed by this corporate franchise, too.
This past year, 2015, President Obama acting as the CEO in charge of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. (the USA, Inc’s latest rendition organized under the laws of the United Nations City-State) announced the creation of a new franchise named after “John Frederick Doe”— a franchise of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Utility named “JOHN F. DOE” operated under the laws of Puerto Rico.
Meanwhile the living American who is the Holder in Due Course of the given name “John Frederick Doe” and who is in fact the owner and executor of his name and all derivatives thereof associated with him, is being subjected to false charges and racketeering on a scale unique in world history.
________________________________________
So…… What to DO about it?
_________________________________________
In order to answer that, you need a few more definitions and research….
What is NATIONALITY? –“That quality or character which arises from the fact of a person’s belonging to a nation or state. Nationality determines the political status of the individual, especially with reference to allegiance; while domicile determines his civil status. Nationality arises either by birth or by naturalization. According to Savigny, “nationality” is also used as opposed to “territoriality,” for the purpose of distinguishing the case of a nation having no national territory.” –The Law Dictionary.
Please note that nationality can be applied according to the country—the land— where you are born, whereas citizenship is a legal status adopted when you are registered with the government in some country.
Nationality can also be an inheritance from one’s parents as when a child is born to Americans living overseas, but one only becomes a citizen of a country via the adoption of a political status.
You can’t change your nationality, but you can change your citizenship, i.e., political status.
Every American–except first generation immigrants– was born on the land of one of the American states or born to parents or grandparents who were, and so by (1) birthright or by (2) inheritance, every American is naturally an American State National, and not a “citizen of the United States”.
You are a native of Florida or Wisconsin or Texas….and your proper nationality is as a Floridian, Wisconsinite or Texan….. and so on, and during your lifetime you do not “belong to” the organic state being referenced, instead, the state—the land— belongs to you.
But then, a dirty trick was played on your Mother at the hospital. People she trusted came to her and told her that it was the “law” that she has to sign certain papers. Unknown to her, those papers register her baby as a “citizen of the United States”—- and we already know what that means. The baby is “seized upon” as a surety backing the debts of the USA, Inc. and the US, Inc. and via the illicit copyrighting of his given name, the baby is identified as chattel property belonging to these private mostly foreign owned corporations.
However, fraud vitiates everything. It destroys all contracts and presumptions. It taints everything it touches. All Americans subjected to this undisclosed process have been defrauded and mischaracterized and deprived of their lawful status. There is no statute of limitations on the crime of fraud and it is recognized as a crime in all venues and jurisdictions of law, national and international, and global.
Okay, so….
Sorting the Poop from the Shinola….
Section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) states that “the term ‘national of the United States’ means (A) a citizen of the United States (read that, “territories and the District of Columbia”), or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States (again, “territories and the District of Columbia”).” Therefore, U.S. citizens are also U.S. nationals. Non-citizen nationality status refers only to individuals who were born either in American Samoa or on Swains Island to parents who are not citizens of the United States.
This is all talking about “citizens of the United States” that is, “citizens of the federal government corporation”.
INA § 349 states that a citizen, whether a U.S. citizen by birth or naturalization [JOHN FREDERICK DOE is a U.S. citizen by process of “naturalization”] shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing certain acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality. The fact of intention is critical; it is not the mere performance of the actions mentioned in § 349.
Seven types of conduct are currently listed in the INA as expatriative. The potentially expatriating acts are: (1) applying for and obtaining naturalization in a foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old; (2) making an oath of allegiance to a foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old; (3) serving in the military of a foreign country as a commissioned or noncommissioned officer or when the foreign state is engaged in hostilities against the United States; (4) serving in a foreign government position that requires an oath of allegiance to or the nationality of that foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old; (5) making a formal renunciation of U.S. citizenship to a consular officer outside of the United States; (6) making a formal renunciation of citizenship while in the United States and during time that the United States is involved in a war; and (7) conviction for treason or attempting by force to overthrow the U.S. government [that is, corporation], including conspiracy convictions.
——————————————————–
Now, finally, consider this supremely important information regarding the separate and “foreign” status of the United States defined as “territories and District of Columbia” (1864) with regard to the actual several states forming the United States (definition (3) from the Hooven case) —-nailed down by “The Informer”:
A key authority on this question (is the federal “United States” a foreign entity with respect to the states of the United States?) is the case of Hanley v. Donoghue, in which the U.S. Supreme Court defined separate bodies of State law as being legally “foreign” with respect to each other:
“No court is to be charged with the knowledge of foreign laws; but they are well understood to be facts which must, like other facts, be proved before they can be received in a court of justice. [cites omitted] It is equally well settled that the several states of the Union are to be considered as in this respect foreign to each other, and that the courts of one state are not presumed to know, and therefore not bound to take judicial notice of, the laws of another state.”
[Hanley v. Donoghue, 116 U.S. 1, 29 L. Ed. 535]
[6 S.Ct. 242, 244 (1885)]
Another key U.S. Supreme Court authority on this question is the case of In re Merriam’s Estate, 36 N.E. 505 (1894). The authors of Corpus Juris Secundum (“CJS”), a legal encyclopedia, relied in part upon this case to arrive at the following conclusion about the “foreign” corporate status of the federal government:
“The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” [citing In re Merriam’s Estate, 36 N.E. 505, 141 N.Y. 479, affirmed U.S. v. Perkins, 16 S.Ct. 1073, 163 U.S. 625, 41 L.Ed 287]
[19 C.J.S. 883]
Before you get the idea that this meaning of “foreign” is now totally antiquated, consider the current edition of Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, which defines “foreign state” very clearly, as follows:
“The several United States*** are considered “foreign” to each other except as regards their relations as common members of the Union. … The term “foreign nations,” as used in a statement of the rule that the laws of foreign nations should be proved in a certain manner, should be construed to mean all nations and states other than that in which the action is brought; and hence one state of the Union is foreign to another, in the sense of that rule.”
And a recent federal statute proves that Congress still refers to the 50 States as “countries”. When a State court in Alaska needed a federal judge to handle a case overload, Congress amended Title 28 to make that possible. In its reference to the 50 States, the statute is titled the “Assignment of Judges to courts of the freely associated compact states”. Then, Congress refers to these freely associated compact states as “countries”:
(b) The Congress consents to the acceptance and retention by any judge so authorized of reimbursement from the countries referred to in subsection (a) …. [!!!]
[28 U.S.C. 297, 11/19/88]” — End quote.
So here is the Big Picture……
The government of the “United States” (read that as: “the territories and District of Columbia” per the 1864 redefinition) is a corporation also called the “UNITED STATES” or “U.S. Corp” or “US, Inc.” set up by the Act of 1877.
That corporation doing business as the US, Inc., and a similar corporation operating as the USA, Inc., have been creating “citizens” for themselves out of thin air, defined as corporate “persons” of various kinds, named after living Americans.
All of these foreign corporate franchises named after you are “citizens of the United States” — meaning (4), “citizens of the United States” or as Kitchens v. Steele put it, “citizens of the federal government” [i.e., corporation].
Currently, the US, Inc. version is doing business as a Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust under the name “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” or whatever your “FIRST MIDDLE LAST” name may be, operated out of Puerto Rico.
The USA, Inc. version is doing business as a franchise of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Utility under the name “JOHN F. DOE” or whatever your “FIRST MIDDLE-INITIAL LAST” name may be. Again, Puerto Rico, a Commonwealth Protectorate of the United States is operating as a semi-autonomous Home Base for all this crime against Americans.
Take all this information into a nice, big, sticky Ball of Wax and what do you get?
(1) Since “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” is a naturalized “citizen of the United States”, “HE” can be expatriated by INA 349 (2) “making an oath of allegiance to a foreign country, provided the person is at least 18 years old” and (2) since the actual states of the Union are all foreign countries with respect to the “United States” referenced, you can repatriate “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” to Wisconsin or Illinois or wherever else he rightfully came from by issuing an Oath of Allegiance to the land he was born on—Wisconsin, Texas, etc., and (3) Sending a certified copy of the new Oath of Allegiance signed by John Frederick Doe (your name substituted appropriately) to John Forbes Kerry, the US (Corporation) Secretary of State, telling him that “JOHN” is expatriating and going home and by the way— all his assets are due and owing as a Priority Creditor of the UNITED STATES. Please send a copy to the United Nations Secretary General and ask him to notify the UN Bankruptcy Trustees presently trying to liquidate the assets of the UNITED STATES, so they can exclude JOHN FREDERICK DOE from the asset roster.
Same thing with “JOHN F. DOE”.
And there isn’t a thing these con artists in suits can say, do, or complain about, because their other option is to admit to their crimes in front of the whole world.
“John Frederick Doe” —is still standing on terra firma, still have your wits about you, and are still able to say that you are a “Citizen of these United States”.
Example:
Act of Expatriation and Oath of Allegiance
Whereas “FIRST MIDDLE LAST” is a naturalized “citizen of the United States” under the Diversity Clause of the Constitution(s) and is the age of majority and whereas such “citizenship” was never desired nor intended nor willingly nor voluntarily entered into, “FIRST MIDDLE LAST” willingly and purposefully renounces all citizenship or other assumed political status related to the United States defined as “the territories and District of Columbia” (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864) and its government, a corporation doing business variously as the UNITED STATES, U.S. Corp, US, Inc., etc. formed under the Act of 1877, and does repatriate to the land of HIS birth known as Wisconsin (Texas, etc. as it applies) and does freely affirm HIS allegiance to the same actual and organic state of the Union and does accept HIS true Nationality as an American State National and an American State Vessel in all international commerce owned and operated by Doe, John Frederick of 1121 Petaluma Court, Felsburg, Florida, 10210.
This do I certify, Witness and confirm this _____day of _______, 2016.
______________________________ by John Frederick Doe, all rights reserved.
Notary Witness
Clark County
Florida State
Before me this _____day of ________ 2016 did appear one JOHN FREDERICK DOE and he did establish this Act of Expatriation and Oath of Allegiance freely and without coercion, in Witness whereof I set my sign and seal.
_________________________________Notary; my commission expires on________________________.

By Anna Von Reitz
We blew off the top of the candle back in 1998 when we discovered and disclosed that our actual national governments have been usurped upon by incorporated subcontractors -- "governmental services corporations" -- in the business of providing governmental services and doing business in the name of actual countries and lawful national governments. 

The United States of America is the actual unincorporated holding company created to hold and exercise the International Powers of Government for America;

"the" United States of America is a British Territorial Commercial Corporation franchise doing business "in our Name" and usurping upon the People and the actual States---- and exercising our Delegated Powers against us.   

In the same way, The United States is the actual unincorporated Union of soil jurisdiction states, while "the" United States is a Municipal (City State) Subcontractor doing business in our names, usurping upon us, and exercising our Delegated Powers against us. 

That is a big enough shock.  

Then we blew things up again in 2008 and brought forward the mechanisms of the fraud and the interlocking trust directorate in back of it all, exposed the Babylonian Slave System that has been secretively imposed by all these "governmental services corporations", and the ancient and venal religious practices and beliefs that are the ultimate source of this horrific and corrupting system. 

A bit earlier today we carried the ball forward and showed you how very, very profitable war has been for these same "governmental services corporations" regardless of the cost of war in terms of blood, suffering, privation, waste, and misery for everyone else. 

With profits like that on the table, it's easy to see why these "governmental services corporations" are war-mongering maniacs.  And why not?   It's all gravy for them.  It's our lives, our sons and daughters, our natural resources, our homes and businesses that are at risk.  

We also briefly discussed how the Pope is supposed to be liquidating all these insane corporations that are criminally trespassing against us and promoting all these wars and destruction---- but isn't, presumably because the kickbacks in terms of money and political power are too juicy. 

The picture that emerges is of the Church merrily fornicating with the Kings of the world and participating in the misery and enslavement of this planet, and of faceless, nameless, immoral "governmental services corporations" making up the top two tiers of a reeking and corrupt pyramid scheme designed to defraud and deprive us of our most basic prerogatives in life, including life itself. 

And now we come briefly to the Third Tier of corruption underlying and underpinning the government services corporations and the "Secular" Church--- the major corporations that go to "confession" in courts around the world and pay huge fines for their crimes, but keep right on committing the same crimes, because the penance is so petty compared to the rewards. 

"Forgive me, Father, for I have sinned.....and though we both know I mean to continue right on sinning and doing the same thing next week, too.....cut to the chase--- how much are you going to take off the top to "forgive" me?"  

Please notice that the bulk of the crimes are crimes against our mutually shared environment, and crimes of monopoly and market manipulation lumped together under the subheading of "Anti-Trust Crimes".  

Our thanks to The Corporate Crime Reporter, and we say, yes, it is more than past time for the Department of Justice to start living up to its name and compiling these crime statistics and for us to put them under the noses of Judges and Legislatures from sea to shining sea: 

https://www.corporatecrimereporter.com/top100.html?fbclid=IwAR2e_Kao5W4w2aw0x1hcbuKIqJ04gFAEtR6qCTeA0cVUW3BuQOtt0kutZMs  

----------------------------

See this article and over 2300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

The following is a compilation of work by Judge Dale, retired, attorney/author Melvin Stamper, and AntiCorruption Society researchers. AntiCorruption Society additions have been inserted as bracketed text.

CORPORATIONS

A corporation is a fictional character or entity in law, created by the government, which makes that fictional character or entity the intellectual property of the government but you are never told that! Corporations can own any number of other corporations but can never own a flesh and blood human being!
[As corporations only exist on paper, they are both defined and bound by the law of contracts – more words on paper. In other words, corporations do not exist in the ‘real world’ and cannot nod their heads, shake hands or utter any words of affirmation.]
All laws created under this parent corporation will essentially become corporate laws and regulations to govern the parent corporation and all subordinate or sub-corporations owned by the parent. These corporate laws and regulations are called statutes and their affect and control over human beings is deceptively obtained by consent through civil contracts. Look up the word ‘person’ in any modern law dictionary and you will see that a person is regarded as a corporation and not a flesh and blood human being.
[The government by becoming a corporator, (See 28 USC §3002(15(A)(B)(C), 22 USCA 286(e)) lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter. (See: The Bank of the United States v. Planters Bank of Georgia, 5 L.Ed. (Wheat) 244; U.S. v. Butt, 309 U.S. 242).]
[In addition, because all corporate-government entities use a private scrip (the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE) to do business they have descended to the level of mere private corporations. For purposes of suit, such corporations are regarded as entities entirely separate from government. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance are made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. See: The Clearfield Doctrine]
These civil contracts were secured by and through several federal and state voluntary registration programs designed to convert and enslave flesh and blood American citizens of the Republic into corporate property. These registration programs always involved government benefits as an inducement. However, nothing is for free and when the state and federal governments offer anything for free, you can bet that upon your acceptance there are ropes and chains about to be attached to your neck, hands and ankles!
Legally, these civil contracts lacked “mutuality,” meaning that all registrants must understand the true nature and intent of the contract and subsequently must knowingly accept or consent to the terms of those contracts. The government’s subversive tactics perverts “mutuality” and lawfully eliminates any and all contractual relationships, as historically established by the International Law of Contracts a/k/a Uniform Commercial Code.
[To understand “mutuality” and the Law of Contracts read the guide LAWFULLY YOURS; APPENDIX D – What is a Contract?]
The federal government, the B.A.R, and the courts rely upon the Maxim that: “Ignorance of the Law is no excuse,” which is capable of being thrown back in their deceptive faces through literacy, which is what this exposé is attempting to provide to you!
When a person is arrested or sued for a statutory regulation, also known as a criminal or civil law, he is actually being accused of violating a corporate regulation or corporate breach of contract! A civil contract that only exists over human beings by deception and fraud!
There are no criminal laws in America. Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Procedure (F.C.R.P.) use to specify this very fact. (e.g.) ‘All laws are civil,’ which was later modified by the Judiciary Act to conceal this fact by creating one set of Civil Rules (F.C.R.P.) and one set of Criminal Rules (F.Cr.R.P.) but this never changed the fact that there are no criminal laws in America.
The Judiciary Act was necessary, once common people began to represent themselves in court and uncover this and other frauds.
These Rules of Procedure and Rules of Court were originally designed and adopted to reduce confusion in the courts and were intended only for lawyers; however this is not to say that the courts will not try to enforce them against non-lawyers!
And by the way, there is no legislation which prohibits a common man to practice law without a license! Neither Lincoln nor Clarence Darrow ever attended law school; neither was licensed and each became a famous lawyer.
Today, each Judge representing a Court of Record is a lawyer and a member of the American B.A.R. Association Union, and all these Union Judges have conspired to write a Local Rule of Procedure, prohibiting non-lawyers from the practice of law without a license! This practice protected their treason, insured work for the Union membership [B.A.R. lawyers] and is openly in violation of Federal Anti-Trust Laws!
Anti-Trust Laws were intended to prevent large monopolies from forming because such monopolies can control prices, eliminate competition and violates free enterprise, which is exactly what the B.A.R. and this Local Rule of Court intended to accomplish! Those Anti-Trust Laws have been modified so many times by B.A.R. Congressmen that they now almost assist in the creation of large monopolies.
An old Maxim of law says it all: “FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING.”
From attorney Melvin Stamper’s book Fruit from a Poisonous Tree [Available at Amazon and Barnes and Noble]:
“The scheme also provided for the control of the courts via the 1913 creation of the American Bar Association, whose parent organization was the European International Bar Association, which was the creation of Rothschild. This allowed the International Bankers to control the practice of law, in that the only ones permitted to practice before the courts were those who were educated under their brand of law, which was only Admiralty and Contract law. Common law of the people was to be replaced as it gave the natural man many jurisdictional protections from the bankers’ legislation.”
“Contract law is above the Constitution and under the jurisdiction of Equity/Admiralty courts, so the governments began to contract with everyone. The 1930s saw federal legislation providing for the registration of babies through applications for birth certificates. Government workers could get maternity leave with pay. The States pushed for registration of cars through applications for certificates of title and for registration of land through registration of deeds of trust. Constructive trusts [Cesta Que Vie (pg 4)] were created secretly by adhesion contracts, giving benefits either present or future and as a result, each of the people blindly walked into the trap of United States democracy and its jurisdiction by the signing of contracts, thereby agreeing to be sureties for the debts of the United States and collateral for the Federal Reserve Bank, Inc.”
The federal and state governments are not real. They are privately owned corporations called governments. The Judges are privately employed administrators called Judges and the law is nothing more than their corporate regulations called Statutes. The courthouses are no longer public buildings but are privately owned structures called Judicial Centers or a Department of Justice and the prisons are privately owned facilities that do not mention the City or County anywhere in their names.
The public defenders, prosecutors and police are not there to protect and serve the public but to the contrary, they are there to protect and serve the private corporation.
The Vatican, Judges, Prosecutor and Clerk make money off of your conviction and the private owners of the prison make money off of your incarceration. Everything you sign with a wet ink signature becomes a negotiable instrument in their world and is converted into a guaranteed asset, like a security or bond because you are a real flesh and blood living person! Many Judges and law firms own the government buildings and the prisons.
Your presence in a prison also fuels a Mutual Fund investment. In their world, everything is fictional and therefore your living status creates substance for their world both physically and in writing!
Who pays for the bulk of these convictions?
Remember those Land Trusts in the name of the Vatican [Cesta Que Vie]? The Prosecutor levels (files) a charge against you and the Trust, with the Clerk. The Clerk documents the case and appoints a judge as the Administrator for the Trust. You are brought before them and asked if you are the named person on the indictment and then they promptly advise you of your rights and the charge. It is your Birth Certificate that is actually on trial and being prosecuted, but you don’t know that and your court appointed lawyer or privately hired lawyer, never tell you!
Upon your conviction, and you will be convicted, the Land Trust pays damages to all involved except you; because you are not real! The living you is the beneficiary of the Trust and the corporate you is on trial! They consider that those Trusts are for them, if they can access it! You never receive the benefits of the Trust and you are sentenced to prison, probation and or fined!
Rebellious or free thinking individuals are usually ostracized, censored, punished or stone walled at every turn because they refuse to accept the propaganda and slave driving techniques being forced upon them by their private corporate owners called the high contracting powers!
You probably identify with this corporate process as legal process but it really isn’t about what is legal or lawful because all process is about the enforcement of contracts or the imposition and enforcement of corporate regulations called statutes.
THE COURTS
The only Constitutional Court in America is the International Court of Trades, which was created because no foreign nation government would trade with the Corporate United States, until they provided a way for these foreign nations to enforce their Trade Agreements with America.
NOTE: Historically, the World Court was created to provide nations with a venue to enforce their Trade Agreements but the Corporate United States refused the court’s invitation to participate because they were denied control over the court.
All of the other American courts are pseudo courts or fictions and simply are corporate administrative offices designed to resemble courts and all of their Judges are simply executive administrators designed to resemble Judges.
The purpose of these pseudo corporate courts are only to settle contract disputes and since George Washington’s government was military in structure, if either party refuses to participate, these Courts cannot become involved and the dispute is dead in the water! My use of the term “dead in the water” is not a canard because these pseudo courts are unconstitutional courts of Admiralty, the International Law of the Sea!
The Washington Monument was completed in 1884 [13 years after the Act of 1871 which established the new UNITED STATES corporation], as a tribute to George Washington and his military government, which is actually a sea-level obelisk that infers that all of America is “under water” and thus subject to the Laws of Admiralty as opposed or contrary to the intended Constitutional civilian government under Common Law.
The pseudo Judges of these pseudo Courts have no powers without the consent of both the Plaintiff and the Defendant. [AND] In every case the Judge must determine that he has consent; Personam and Subject Matter Jurisdiction before he can act or access the Cesta Que Trust.
Repeat: In every case the Judge must determine that he has consent; Personam and Subject Matter Jurisdiciton before he can act or access the Cesta Que Trust.
[Some folks have successfully denied the Judge Subject Matter Jurisdiction by the use of an “estoppel”. They have stated in court that the Judge is the Corporation and they are a flesh and blood woman (or man) and therefore they cannot see each other. Placing this statement on the court record resulted in the Judge dismissing the case.]
The Cesta Que Trust
All tradable securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted into government securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. [Evidence of this can be located in a CRIS Report.] Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a government Cesta Que Trust and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this Cesta Que Trust that the Judge, Clerk and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! . . . The Federal Reserve system is responsible for the management of those Investments.
The best advice you will ever receive is: to avoid their courts whenever possible. There is no justice to be found in those courts unless you are a member of the Vatican, the royal or elite, or have purchased diplomatic immunity!
END NOTES from ACS

Evidence of our corporate government can be found in the wording of STATE statutes. The Uniform Commercial code, as described by Judge Dale, retired, is the International Law of Contracts. Here is an example referring to the local boards of education from the Ohio Revised Code, which was adopted in October 1953: